Diabetes Care
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tate, P. F.
Right arrow Articles by Walters, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tate, P. F.
Right arrow Articles by Walters, J. E.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Diabetes Care, Vol 15, Issue 4 536-538, Copyright © 1992 by American Diabetes Association

ARTICLES

Accuracy of home blood glucose monitors

PF Tate, CA Clements and JE Walters
Diabetes Center, Providence Hospital, Mobile, AL 36685.

OBJECTIVE--To determine the accuracy of five home blood glucose monitors (HBGM) in reference to a standard laboratory reference method. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS--The study took place in the laboratory of a 350-bed private acute-care hospital. Subjects were a sample of convenience of 207 diabetic and nondiabetic adult and pediatric patients scheduled for fasting blood work that included a blood glucose test. Venous blood samples were collected for laboratory determination of blood glucose level. A separate sample was collected for testing on two each of five HBGMs: AccuChek II M, Tracer II, ExacTech, Glucometer II with Memory, and One Touch. RESULTS--Multiple regression analysis showed that all 10 monitors could be used to predict laboratory blood glucose values. The monitors with the highest predictabilities were One Touch, Tracer II, and AccuChek II M. Consistency between monitors of the same brand was lowest with One Touch. AccuChek II M had the smallest SD between the 2 monitors used in the study. CONCLUSIONS--HBGM can be used to predict actual laboratory values of blood glucose. However, the controlled environment of the study should be considered and patient education made a high priority when recommending monitors.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Diabetes CareHome page
D. E. Goldstein, R. R. Little, R. A. Lorenz, J. I. Malone, D. Nathan, C. M. Peterson, and D. B. Sacks
Tests of Glycemia in Diabetes
Diabetes Care, July 1, 2004; 27(7): 1761 - 1773.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Clin. Chem.Home page
D. B. Sacks, D. E. Bruns, D. E. Goldstein, N. K. Maclaren, J. M. McDonald, and M. Parrott
Guidelines and Recommendations for Laboratory Analysis in the Diagnosis and Management of Diabetes Mellitus
Clin. Chem., March 1, 2002; 48(3): 436 - 472.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Diabetes Diabetes Care Clinical Diabetes Diabetes Spectrum
Copyright © 1992 by the American Diabetes Association.