Diabetes Care, Vol 15, Issue 7 859-863, Copyright © 1992 by American Diabetes Association
Controversial beliefs about diabetes and its care
RM Anderson, MB Donnelly and WK Davis
University of Michigan Medical School, Michigan Diabetes Research and Training Center, Department of Postgraduate Medicine/Health Professions Education, Ann Arbor.
OBJECTIVE--The purpose of this study was to identify specific beliefs that
differentiate health-care professionals whose attitudes toward diabetes
agreed most strongly with a group of national diabetes experts from those
whose attitudes disagreed most strongly. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS--The
sample for this study included 271 physicians, 834 nurses, and 546
dietitians who completed a Diabetes Attitudes Survey. The sample included
specialists in diabetes care and nonspecialists. Controversial beliefs
about diabetes and its care were determined by comparing the beliefs of the
10% of the sample whose attitudes were most concordant (with the national
panel) with the beliefs of the 10% of the sample whose attitudes were the
most discordant. Ten beliefs met the criteria for being defined as
controversial. RESULTS--The most controversial beliefs concerned whether
the patient or the physician should be the primary decision maker in
diabetes care, the meaning of patient noncompliance, and the seriousness of
non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. The 10% of the sample with the
most discordant attitudes contained a disproportionately large number of
physicians, nonspecialists in diabetes, and health-care professionals who
had been in practice longer than the other members of the sample.
CONCLUSIONS--This study identifies some important differences in beliefs
between younger health-care professionals who specialize in diabetes and
older nonspecialists. Such beliefs should be addressed in continuing
education programs with the aim being to foster the widespread adoption of
a contemporary approach to diabetes care.