Diabetes Care, Vol 15, Issue 8 1014-1019, Copyright © 1992 by American Diabetes Association

ARTICLES

Granulocytes and three-phase bone scintigraphy for differentiation of diabetic gangrene with and without osteomyelitis

MM Ritter, WO Richter, G Leinsinger, CM Kirsch and P Schwandt
Medical Department II, University of Munich, Germany.

OBJECTIVE--In diabetic gangrene, concomitant osteopathy and soft-tissue infection often render laboratory and roentgenographic signs unreliable as indicators of osteomyelitis. In this situation, scintigraphic methods can be helpful. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS--Relying on the long-term clinical course as the final indicator of presence or absence of osteomyelitis, we prospectively compared in 31 patients three-phase bone scintigraphy with either indium-labeled autologous granulocytes (n = 20) or 123I-labeled antibodies against granulocytes (n = 11). RESULTS--Three-phase bone scintigraphy and imaging with indium-labeled autologous granulocytes yielded sensitivities and specificities of 95 and 70% for bone scintigraphy and 77 and 100% for granulocyte scintigraphy, respectively. One patient with severe angiopathy and proved osteomyelitis had a negative bone scintigraphy but a positive scintigraphy with labeled antibodies against granulocytes. One patient with aseptic bone necrosis presented with a formally false positive result with both methods. CONCLUSIONS--In contrast to former retrospective studies, three-phase bone scintigraphy compares very well with granulocyte scintigraphy. The care of most patients can be managed with clinical data and this widely available scintigraphic method.
CiteULike    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?