Diabetes Care
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cowett, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Ogburn, P. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cowett, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Ogburn, P. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Diabetes Care, Vol 16, Issue 1 51-56, Copyright © 1993 by American Diabetes Association


ARTICLES

Lipid tolerance testing in pregnancy

RM Cowett, SR Carr and PL Ogburn
Department of Pediatrics, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence 02905-2401.

OBJECTIVE--Macrosomia in the infant of the well-controlled diabetic mother suggests that a substrate other than glucose may influence fetal growth. We hypothesized that GDM alters lipid homeostasis during pregnancy. Our objective was to determine if an LTT could assist in identification of lipid abnormalities in the GDM individual. RESEARCH DESIGNS AND METHODS--The LTT consisted of bolus infusion of 1.0 mg/kg 10% Intralipid (Cutter Vitrum, Berkeley, CA) followed by measurements of plasma glucose, insulin, glycerol, total triglycerides, and triglyceride fatty acids (18:1 and 18:2), total FFAs, and total phospholipids for 30 min before and 90 min after the bolus. The study groups were composed of 8 nonpregnant, nondiabetic subjects, 8 pregnant, nondiabetic subjects, 8 GDM patients receiving insulin, and 8 GDM patients who were diet controlled. RESULTS--Plasma glucose and plasma insulin concentrations did not change significantly after the bolus. No significant difference was noted in the K2 for glycerol of the nonpregnant, nondiabetic group compared with the pregnant groups. The K2 for total triglycerides, plasma triglyceride 18:1, and plasma triglyceride 18:2 indicated increased rates of disappearance of these substrates for the nonpregnant nondiabetic group compared with all pregnant groups. No significant differences were observed among the pregnant groups for any of these parameters. CONCLUSIONS--Pregnancy may be associated with a decreased rate of triglyceride lipolysis compared with nonpregnancy. No differences in lipid metabolism were noted among normal pregnant and relatively well-controlled GDM patients.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Diabetes Diabetes Care Clinical Diabetes Diabetes Spectrum
Copyright © 1993 by the American Diabetes Association.