Diabetes Care
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lewis, G. F.
Right arrow Articles by Barron, W. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lewis, G. F.
Right arrow Articles by Barron, W. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Diabetes Care, Vol 16, Issue 12 1551-1556, Copyright © 1993 by American Diabetes Association


ARTICLES

Prior feeding alters the response to the 50-g glucose challenge test in pregnancy. The Staub-Traugott effect revisited

GF Lewis, C McNally, JD Blackman, KS Polonsky and WM Barron
Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Illinois.

OBJECTIVE--To examine the effect of prior meal ingestion on the glucose, insulin, and C-peptide response to a 50-g glucose challenge test in the third trimester of pregnancy. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS--Ten pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus and 12 nondiabetic pregnant control subjects matched for age and weight underwent a 50-g glucose challenge test on three occasions within a 2-wk period, in random order. On one occasion the test was administered in the fasting state (fasting glucose challenge test), on a second occasion the test was administered 1 h after ingestion of a standard mixed meal (1-h postprandial study), and on a third occasion the test was administered 2 h after ingestion of a standard mixed meal (2-h postprandial study). RESULTS--In the control subjects, the plasma glucose level 1 h after ingestion of 50 g of glucose was higher in the fasting study (7.8 +/- 0.4 mM, 7 of 12 subjects with glucose > or = 7.8 mM) than in the 1-h postprandial study (6.7 +/- 0.3 mM, 3 of 12 subjects with glucose > or = 7.8 mM) and the 2-h postprandial study of (6.3 +/- 0.4 mM, 3 of 12 with glucose > or = 7.8 mM) (P < 0.01). In the postprandial studies of control subjects, insulin and C-peptide levels were higher at the time of ingestion of the 50 g of glucose, but the early (1 h) insulin secretory response was less than in the fasting study. In the diabetic patients, glucose levels 1 h after 50-g glucose ingestion were similar in the fasting study (10.5 +/- 0.4 mM, no subjects with glucose value < 7.8 mM) and the 1-h postprandial study (11.0 +/- 0.6 mM, 1 subject with glucose < 7.8 mM), but was lower in the 2-h postprandial study (9.3 +/- 0.3 mM, 1 subject with glucose < 7.8 mM) (P < 0.03). In contrast to the control subjects, the insulin secretory response to 50 g of oral glucose was greater in the two postprandial studies than in the fasting study. CONCLUSIONS--We have reached the following conclusions. 1) In nondiabetic gravidas, plasma glucose concentrations 1 h after ingestion of a 50-g oral glucose load are higher if administered in the fasting state compared with the postprandial state. 2) During normal pregnancy the Staub-Traugott Effect, i.e., improved glucose disposal after successive glucose load administrations, occurs and appears to be caused by mechanisms other than enhanced insulin secretion with successive glucose loads. 3) The effect of the prandial state on plasma glucose response to the 50-g glucose challenge test used to screen for gestational diabetes mellitus may be of sufficient magnitude to significantly alter the operating characteristics, i.e., sensitivity and specificity, of this test.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
DiabetesHome page
A. Mari, A. Tura, A. Gastaldelli, and E. Ferrannini
Assessing Insulin Secretion by Modeling in Multiple-Meal Tests: Role of Potentiation
Diabetes, February 1, 2002; 51(90001): S221 - 226.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
D. Perucchini, U. Fischer, G. A Spinas, R. Huch, A. Huch, and R. Lehmann
Using fasting plasma glucose concentrations to screen for gestational diabetes mellitus: prospective population based study
BMJ, September 25, 1999; 319(7213): 812 - 815.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
NEJMHome page
M. F. Greene
Screening for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus
N. Engl. J. Med., November 27, 1997; 337(22): 1625 - 1626.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Diabetes Diabetes Care Clinical Diabetes Diabetes Spectrum
Copyright © 1993 by the American Diabetes Association.