Diabetes Care
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bravenboer, B.
Right arrow Articles by Erkelens, D. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bravenboer, B.
Right arrow Articles by Erkelens, D. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Diabetes Care, Vol 16, Issue 9 1249-1253, Copyright © 1993 by American Diabetes Association


ARTICLES

Is the corrected QT interval a reliable indicator of the severity of diabetic autonomic neuropathy?

B Bravenboer, PH Hendriksen, LP Oey, WH Gispen, AC van Huffelen and DW Erkelens
Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Utrecht, The Netherlands.

OBJECTIVE--We investigated whether the corrected QT interval correlated with two other tests for diagnosing autonomic dysfunction in 60 type I diabetic patients with proven peripheral neuropathy. The mean age +/- SD was 48.3 +/- 11.2 yr, the mean duration of diabetes was 24.9 +/- 11.4 yr, and the mean HbA1 was 9.3 +/- 2.4%. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS--All patients underwent three autonomic function tests: 1) the standard five cardiovascular Ewing tests, each scored 0 (normal), 0.5 (borderline), or 1.0 (abnormal). We used the sum of the abnormal findings for the analysis, the cardiovascular autonomic score; 2) measurement of the corrected QT interval taken from a routine electrocardiogram recording; and 3) static and dynamic pupillometry: measurement of dark adapted pupil diameter as percentage of total iris diameter and of pupil constriction latency using an infrared light reflex technique. RESULTS--No significant correlation was found between age, duration of diabetes, or HbA1 and any of the autonomic function tests, except for one between age and cardiovascular autonomic score (r = 0.3202, P = 0.0126). Corrected QT interval did not correlate with cardiovascular autonomic score, pupil diameter, or constriction latency. A significant inverse correlation was found between cardiovascular autonomic score and pupil diameter (r = -0.4861, P < 0.001) and constriction latency (r = 0.3783, P < 0.001). Pupil diameter and constriction latency correlated well (r = -0.4276, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS--The corrected QT interval did not correlate with cardiovascular autonomic tests nor pupillometry results. The corrected QT interval therefore should not be used for the diagnosis of the severity of diabetic autonomic neuropathy.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
British Journal of Diabetes & Vascular DiseaseHome page
R. Kumar, M. Fisher, and P. W Macfarlane
Review: Diabetes and the QT interval: time for debate
The British Journal of Diabetes & Vascular Disease, May 1, 2004; 4(3): 146 - 150.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
D. Pittasch, R. Lobmann, W. Behrens-Baumann, and H. Lehnert
Pupil Signs of Sympathetic Autonomic Neuropathy in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes
Diabetes Care, September 1, 2002; 25(9): 1545 - 1550.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Diabetes Diabetes Care Clinical Diabetes Diabetes Spectrum
Copyright © 1993 by the American Diabetes Association.