Diabetes Care, Vol 18, Issue 11 1452-1459, Copyright © 1995 by American Diabetes Association
Improved postprandial metabolic control after subcutaneous injection of a short-acting insulin analog in IDDM of short duration with residual pancreatic beta-cell function
S Pampanelli, E Torlone, C Ialli, P Del Sindaco, M Ciofetta, M Lepore, L Bartocci, P Brunetti and GB Bolli
Dipartimento di Medicina Interna, Universita di Perugia, Italy.
OBJECTIVE: To compare postprandial metabolic control after subcutaneous
injection of a short-acting insulin analog [Lys(B289),Pro(B29)] (Lispro) or
human regular insulin (Humulin R U-100 [Hum-R]) in insulin-dependent
diabetes mellitus (IDDM) of short duration with residual beta-cell
function. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Six IDDM patients (age 25 +/- 2
years, diabetes duration 14 +/- 2 months, HbA1c 6.4 +/- 0.5%) with residual
pancreatic beta-cell function (fasting plasma C-peptide 0.19 +/- 0.02
nmol/l) were studied on three different occasions. Postbreakfast plasma
glucose was maintained at approximately 7.1 mmol/l by means of intravenous
insulin until either 1200 when 0.1 U/kg Hum-R was injected or until 1225
when 0.1 U/kg of either Hum-R or Lispro was injected subcutaneously. Lunch
(mixed meal, 692 Kcal) was served at 1230 (0 min). Six nondiabetic control
subjects were also studied. RESULTS: After Lispro administration, the
120-min plasma glucose decreased more (6.1 +/- 0.3 mmol/l) than after
injection of Hum-R at -30 min (7.7 +/- 0.3 mmol/l) or -5 min (9.9 +/- 0.2
mmol/l). By the end of the study, plasma glucose was still lower after
Lispro was injected (6.7 +/- 0.3 mmol/l) than after Hum-R was injected at
-30 min (7.6 +/- 0.3 mmol/l) or -5 min (7.3 +/- 0.2 mmol/l) (P < 0.05).
Two IDDM patients required glucose to prevent hypoglycemia after being
injected with Lispro, but four required glucose after being injected with
Hum-R at -5 min (Lispro approximately 27 mmol glucose infused between 90
and 240 min; Hum-R approximately 80 mmol between 240 and 390 min). After
Lispro, plasma insulin peaked earlier (at 30 min, 342 +/- 29 pmol/l) than
after Hum-R injection at -30 min (at 90 min, 198 +/- 28 pmol/l) and was
superimposable on that of nondiabetic subjects. In Hum-R injected at -5
min, plasma insulin peaked later (at 120 min) and subsequently remained
greater than in the two other studies. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the lack of a
time interval between injection and meal, Lispro controls postprandial
plasma glucose concentration better than Hum-R given 30 min before meals
and, to an even greater extent, better than Hum-R given 5 min before meals.
In addition, Lispro minimizes the risk of postprandial hypoglycemia, thus
closely mimicking the postprandial glucose homeostasis of nondiabetic
subjects. IDDM patients with residual pancreatic beta-cell function are the
ideal candidates for prandial use of Lispro because they can maintain
near-normoglycemia longer after subcutaneous analog injection because of
residual endogenous insulin secretion.