Diabetes Care
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pampanelli, S.
Right arrow Articles by Bolli, G. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pampanelli, S.
Right arrow Articles by Bolli, G. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Diabetes Care, Vol 18, Issue 11 1452-1459, Copyright © 1995 by American Diabetes Association


ARTICLES

Improved postprandial metabolic control after subcutaneous injection of a short-acting insulin analog in IDDM of short duration with residual pancreatic beta-cell function

S Pampanelli, E Torlone, C Ialli, P Del Sindaco, M Ciofetta, M Lepore, L Bartocci, P Brunetti and GB Bolli
Dipartimento di Medicina Interna, Universita di Perugia, Italy.

OBJECTIVE: To compare postprandial metabolic control after subcutaneous injection of a short-acting insulin analog [Lys(B289),Pro(B29)] (Lispro) or human regular insulin (Humulin R U-100 [Hum-R]) in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) of short duration with residual beta-cell function. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Six IDDM patients (age 25 +/- 2 years, diabetes duration 14 +/- 2 months, HbA1c 6.4 +/- 0.5%) with residual pancreatic beta-cell function (fasting plasma C-peptide 0.19 +/- 0.02 nmol/l) were studied on three different occasions. Postbreakfast plasma glucose was maintained at approximately 7.1 mmol/l by means of intravenous insulin until either 1200 when 0.1 U/kg Hum-R was injected or until 1225 when 0.1 U/kg of either Hum-R or Lispro was injected subcutaneously. Lunch (mixed meal, 692 Kcal) was served at 1230 (0 min). Six nondiabetic control subjects were also studied. RESULTS: After Lispro administration, the 120-min plasma glucose decreased more (6.1 +/- 0.3 mmol/l) than after injection of Hum-R at -30 min (7.7 +/- 0.3 mmol/l) or -5 min (9.9 +/- 0.2 mmol/l). By the end of the study, plasma glucose was still lower after Lispro was injected (6.7 +/- 0.3 mmol/l) than after Hum-R was injected at -30 min (7.6 +/- 0.3 mmol/l) or -5 min (7.3 +/- 0.2 mmol/l) (P < 0.05). Two IDDM patients required glucose to prevent hypoglycemia after being injected with Lispro, but four required glucose after being injected with Hum-R at -5 min (Lispro approximately 27 mmol glucose infused between 90 and 240 min; Hum-R approximately 80 mmol between 240 and 390 min). After Lispro, plasma insulin peaked earlier (at 30 min, 342 +/- 29 pmol/l) than after Hum-R injection at -30 min (at 90 min, 198 +/- 28 pmol/l) and was superimposable on that of nondiabetic subjects. In Hum-R injected at -5 min, plasma insulin peaked later (at 120 min) and subsequently remained greater than in the two other studies. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the lack of a time interval between injection and meal, Lispro controls postprandial plasma glucose concentration better than Hum-R given 30 min before meals and, to an even greater extent, better than Hum-R given 5 min before meals. In addition, Lispro minimizes the risk of postprandial hypoglycemia, thus closely mimicking the postprandial glucose homeostasis of nondiabetic subjects. IDDM patients with residual pancreatic beta-cell function are the ideal candidates for prandial use of Lispro because they can maintain near-normoglycemia longer after subcutaneous analog injection because of residual endogenous insulin secretion.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
A. Lindholm, L. B. Jensen, P. D. Home, P. Raskin, B. O. Boehm, and J. Rastam
Immune Responses to Insulin Aspart and Biphasic Insulin Aspart in People With Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes
Diabetes Care, May 1, 2002; 25(5): 876 - 882.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
H. P. Chase, T. Lockspeiser, B. Peery, M. Shepherd, T. MacKenzie, J. Anderson, and S. K. Garg
The Impact of the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial and Humalog Insulin on Glycohemoglobin Levels and Severe Hypoglycemia in Type 1 Diabetes
Diabetes Care, March 1, 2001; 24(3): 430 - 434.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
NEJMHome page
F. Holleman and J. B.L. Hoekstra
Insulin Lispro
N. Engl. J. Med., July 17, 1997; 337(3): 176 - 183.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
M. R. Burge, D. L. Waters, J. H. Holcombe, and D. S. Schade
Prolonged Efficacy of Short Acting Insulin Lispro in Combination with Human Ultralente in Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., March 1, 1997; 82(3): 920 - 924.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Diabetes Diabetes Care Clinical Diabetes Diabetes Spectrum
Copyright © 1995 by the American Diabetes Association.