Diabetes Care, Vol 19, Issue 12 1326-1332, Copyright © 1996 by American Diabetes Association
Comparison of different insulin regimens in elderly patients with NIDDM
BH Wolffenbuttel, JP Sels, GJ Rondas-Colbers, PP Menheere and AC Nieuwenhuijzen Kruseman
Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Maastricht, The Netherlands. bwo@sint.azm.nl
OBJECTIVE: To compare the metabolic effects of three different frequently
used regimens of insulin administration on blood glucose control and serum
lipids, and the costs associated with this treatment, in subjects with
NIDDM, who were poorly controlled with oral antihyperglycemic agents.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We studied 95 elderly patients with NIDDM (age
68 +/- 9 years, BMI 26.0 +/- 4.6 kg/m2, and median time since diagnosis of
diabetes 9 years [range 1-37]; 37 men, 58 women), who were poorly
controlled, despite diet and maximal doses of oral antihyperglycemic
agents. Three insulin administration regimens were compared during a
6-month period: patients were randomized for treatment with a two-injection
scheme (regimen A) or a combination of glibenclamide with one injection of
NPH insulin, administered either at bedtime (regimen B) or before breakfast
(regimen C), and insulin treatment was mainly instituted in an outpatient
setting. RESULTS: After 6 months of insulin treatment, fasting blood
glucose of the total patient population had decreased from an average of
14.1 +/- 2.2 to 8.3 +/- 2.0 mmol/L (P < 0.001), and HbA1c fell from 11.0
+/- 1.3 to 8.3 +/- 1.2% (P < 0.001); 34 patients reached HbA1c levels
below 8.0%, 25 of them even below 7.5%. With two insulin injections daily,
HbA1c decreased from 11.2 +/- 1.3 to 8.2 +/- 1.2%, while during combined
treatment, HbA1c fell from 10.5 +/- 1.2 to 8.1 +/- 1.1% (regimen B) and
from 11.1 +/- 1.3 to 8.5 +/- 1.1% (regimen C). Comparable improvement of
the other measures of glycemic control, lipids and lipoproteins, was
observed in the different treatment regimens. Body weight increase was
moderate (mean +/- 4.0 kg) and similar in all patient groups. One-third of
patients starting with one insulin injection daily needed a second
injection to control glycemia. One episode of severe hypoglycemia was
observed. Combined insulin-sulfonylurea treatment was almost 20% more
expensive than twice-daily administration of insulin alone. CONCLUSIONS:
Insulin treatment can safely be instituted in elderly patients with NIDDM.
However, it is difficult to obtain optimal glycemic control. Insulin has
moderate beneficial effects on serum lipoproteins. Although on the basis of
glycemic control and weight gain, no preference for any treatment regimen
can be discerned, twice-daily insulin administration is the most simple and
cost-effective regimen.