Diabetes Care, Vol 19, Issue 12 1430-1433, Copyright © 1996 by American Diabetes Association
Influence of simulated altitude on the performance of five blood glucose meters
JF Gautier, AX Bigard, P Douce, A Duvallet and G Cathelineau
Department of Endocrinology, Saint-Louis Hospital, Paris, France.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the reliability of five blood glucose meters (BGMs)
at various simulated altitudes using a hypobaric chamber. RESEARCH DESIGN
AND METHODS: Blood glucose levels (ranged from 1.5 to 26.3 mmol/l,
according to the reference method) were measured in 18 venous blood samples
by each BGM at 200, 1,000, and every 500 m up to 4,000 m in a hypobaric
chamber, where temperature and humidity were held constant. RESULTS: Four
BGMs underestimated and one overestimated blood glucose concentration while
barometric pressure decreased. The average percent error varied in relation
to simulated altitude from 0.26 +/- 4.8% (SD) at 200 m to -28.9 +/- 4.5% at
4,000 m (Glucometer 3; P < 0.05), from 28.4 +/- 5.7 to 49.3 +/- 5.9%
(Accu-Chek Easy; P < 0.05), from -10.5 +/- 2.6 to 19.8 +/- 4.3% (Tracer,
P < 0.05), from -5.5 +/- 2.6 to -11.2 +/- 3.0% (Reflolux; NS), and from
17.8 +/- 4.3 to 14.8 +/- 3.6% (One Touch; NS). The most accurate seemed to
be the Reflolux, except for high blood glucose levels at simulated high
altitudes. The One Touch II showed a good agreement, whatever the
barometric pressure and the range of blood glucose concentrations. The
highest underestimation was seen with the Glucometer 3. CONCLUSIONS: Except
for the Accu-Chek Easy, low barometric pressure underestimated the BGM
results in comparison with measurements taken at simulated low altitudes.
The lack of accuracy and consistency of performance > 2,000 m should be
known by diabetic patients practicing sports activities, such as trekking
or skiing at high altitudes.