Diabetes Care
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gautier, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Cathelineau, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gautier, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Cathelineau, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Diabetes Care, Vol 19, Issue 12 1430-1433, Copyright © 1996 by American Diabetes Association


ARTICLES

Influence of simulated altitude on the performance of five blood glucose meters

JF Gautier, AX Bigard, P Douce, A Duvallet and G Cathelineau
Department of Endocrinology, Saint-Louis Hospital, Paris, France.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the reliability of five blood glucose meters (BGMs) at various simulated altitudes using a hypobaric chamber. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Blood glucose levels (ranged from 1.5 to 26.3 mmol/l, according to the reference method) were measured in 18 venous blood samples by each BGM at 200, 1,000, and every 500 m up to 4,000 m in a hypobaric chamber, where temperature and humidity were held constant. RESULTS: Four BGMs underestimated and one overestimated blood glucose concentration while barometric pressure decreased. The average percent error varied in relation to simulated altitude from 0.26 +/- 4.8% (SD) at 200 m to -28.9 +/- 4.5% at 4,000 m (Glucometer 3; P < 0.05), from 28.4 +/- 5.7 to 49.3 +/- 5.9% (Accu-Chek Easy; P < 0.05), from -10.5 +/- 2.6 to 19.8 +/- 4.3% (Tracer, P < 0.05), from -5.5 +/- 2.6 to -11.2 +/- 3.0% (Reflolux; NS), and from 17.8 +/- 4.3 to 14.8 +/- 3.6% (One Touch; NS). The most accurate seemed to be the Reflolux, except for high blood glucose levels at simulated high altitudes. The One Touch II showed a good agreement, whatever the barometric pressure and the range of blood glucose concentrations. The highest underestimation was seen with the Glucometer 3. CONCLUSIONS: Except for the Accu-Chek Easy, low barometric pressure underestimated the BGM results in comparison with measurements taken at simulated low altitudes. The lack of accuracy and consistency of performance > 2,000 m should be known by diabetic patients practicing sports activities, such as trekking or skiing at high altitudes.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
P. L. Brubaker
Adventure Travel and Type 1 Diabetes: The complicating effects of high altitude
Diabetes Care, October 1, 2005; 28(10): 2563 - 2572.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
D. Oberg and C.-G. Ostenson
Performance of Glucose Dehydrogenase-and Glucose Oxidase-Based Blood Glucose Meters at High Altitude and Low Temperature
Diabetes Care, May 1, 2005; 28(5): 1261 - 1261.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Sports. Med.Home page
K Moore, C Thompson, and R Hayes
Diabetes and extreme altitude mountaineering
Br. J. Sports Med., April 1, 2001; 35(2): 83 - 83.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Diabetes Diabetes Care Clinical Diabetes Diabetes Spectrum
Copyright © 1996 by the American Diabetes Association.