Diabetes Care
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ter Braak, E. W.
Right arrow Articles by Kurtz, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by ter Braak, E. W.
Right arrow Articles by Kurtz, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Diabetes Care, Vol 19, Issue 12 1437-1440, Copyright © 1996 by American Diabetes Association


ARTICLES

Injection site effects on the pharmacokinetics and glucodynamics of insulin lispro and regular insulin

EW ter Braak, JR Woodworth, R Bianchi, B Cerimele, DW Erkelens, JH Thijssen and D Kurtz
Lilly Laboratory for Clinical Research, Eli Lilly and Company, Wishard Memorial Hospital, Indianapolis, IN 46219, USA.

OBJECTIVE: The pharmacokinetics and glucodynamics of a new insulin analog, insulin lispro, and regular human insulin were compared and contrasted after subcutaneous administrations in femoral, deltoid, and abdominal injection sites. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Single 0.2 U/kg doses of insulin lispro and regular insulin were administered to 12 healthy subjects in a six-way randomized crossover fashion. Each dose was given after an overnight fast in one of three injection sites: abdominal, deltoid, or femoral. Study drugs were given during a manual euglycemic glucose clamp. Blood samples were collected over the 12-h clamp for measurement of insulin-reactive components, with pharmacokinetic and glucodynamic measurements derived from these serum insulin and clamp measurements. RESULTS: Glucodynamic comparisons between insulin lispro and regular insulin showed a greater maximum infusion rate (Rmax) at an earlier time (TRmax), regardless of injection site. The total glucose infused (Gtot) showed nearly identical values between sites for insulin lispro. Regular insulin showed greater Gtot values from deltoid and femoral injections. When comparisons were made between drugs, regular insulin produced significantly greater Gtot, primarily driven by the increased Gtot from deltoid and femoral injections. Greater maximum serum insulin concentrations (Cmax) were experienced with insulin lispro at earlier times (tmax), regardless of the injection site (P < 0.001). Abdominal administrations produced the greatest Cmax values at the earliest tmax for both regular insulin and insulin lispro. Deltoid and femoral injections had lower Cmax values for both compounds. Shifts also occurred with tmax, although these shifts were much greater with regular insulin than with insulin lispro. Equivalent area under the curve (AUC) values were found when compared between compounds. CONCLUSIONS: Slower absorption from deltoid and femoral administrations resulted in an increased duration of action for both regular insulin and insulin lispro when compared to abdominal administration. However, notable increases in the onset of action were only apparent with regular insulin. The consistency with insulin lispro response from abdominal and extremity injection sites allows more potential sites for subcutaneous injection with an assured rapid response.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
T. Linn, B. Fischer, N. Soydan, M. Eckhard, J. Ehl, C. Kunz, and R. G. Bretzel
Nocturnal Glucose Metabolism after Bedtime Injection of Insulin Glargine or Neutral Protamine Hagedorn Insulin in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2008; 93(10): 3839 - 3846.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Drug Metab. Dispos.Home page
J. Kota, K. K. Machavaram, D. N. McLennan, G. A. Edwards, C. J. H. Porter, and S. A. Charman
Lymphatic Absorption of Subcutaneously Administered Proteins: Influence of Different Injection Sites on the Absorption of Darbepoetin Alfa Using a Sheep Model
Drug Metab. Dispos., December 1, 2007; 35(12): 2211 - 2217.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EDUCATION AND PRACTICEHome page
F. M Regan and D. B Dunger
Use of new insulins in children
Arch. Dis. Child. Ed. Pract., August 1, 2006; 91(2): ep47 - ep53.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
E. T. Rhodes, L. R. Ferrari, and J. I. Wolfsdorf
Perioperative Management of Pediatric Surgical Patients with Diabetes Mellitus
Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2005; 101(4): 986 - 999.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
T. Lindstrom, C. A. Hedman, and H. J. Arnqvist
Use of a Novel Double-Antibody Technique to Describe the Pharmacokinetics of Rapid-Acting Insulin Analogs
Diabetes Care, June 1, 2002; 25(6): 1049 - 1054.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
J P H Shield and J D Baum
Advances in childhood onset diabetes
Arch. Dis. Child., April 1, 1998; 78(4): 391 - 394.
[Full Text]


Home page
DTBHome page
{blacktriangledown}Humalog - a new insulin analogue
DTB, August 1, 1997; 35(8): 57 - 58.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
F. Holleman and J. B.L. Hoekstra
Insulin Lispro
N. Engl. J. Med., July 17, 1997; 337(3): 176 - 183.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Diabetes Diabetes Care Clinical Diabetes Diabetes Spectrum
Copyright © 1996 by the American Diabetes Association.