Diabetes Care, Vol 19, Issue 2 168-170, Copyright © 1996 by American Diabetes Association

ARTICLES

Efficacy of feedback from quarterly laboratory comparison in maintaining quality of a hospital capillary blood glucose monitoring program

HE Jones, B Cleave, B Zinman, JP Szalai, HL Nichol and BR Hoffman
Department of Nursing, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada.

OBJECTIVE: A 1-year randomized prospective study was conducted to investigate the efficacy of feedback from split-sample testing as part of a capillary blood glucose quality assurance program. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 124 nurses were randomized to either group A (quarterly comparisons with feedback) or group B (no feedback). The measure of nurse accuracy against the laboratory at 0, 6, and 12 months was determined by an additional five to seven split-sample tests without giving feedback to either group. Mean accuracy was determined in terms of percent absolute deviation from the laboratory result and a clinical consensus limit of +/- 20% deviation from the laboratory. RESULTS: By 12 months, there was a significant effect of feedback on nurse agreement with the laboratory method (P = 0.022 when agreement was scored as the mean percent absolute difference and P = 0.002 when agreement was scored in terms of the +/- 20% clinical consensus limit). Nurses in the group who had received no quarterly feedback from split-sample testing produced a 3.5% greater mean percent absolute deviation from the laboratory method and 12% fewer comparisons within the acceptable +/- 20% range. CONCLUSIONS: Feedback received from split-sample testing has a significant effect in maintaining accuracy in capillary blood glucose monitoring.
CiteULike    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?