Diabetes Care
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goldstein, E. J.
Right arrow Articles by Nesbit, C. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goldstein, E. J.
Right arrow Articles by Nesbit, C. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Diabetes Care, Vol 19, Issue 6 638-641, Copyright © 1996 by American Diabetes Association


ARTICLES

Diabetic foot infections. Bacteriology and activity of 10 oral antimicrobial agents against bacteria isolated from consecutive cases

EJ Goldstein, DM Citron and CA Nesbit
R.M. Alden Research Laboratory, Santa Monica Hospital Medical Center, California 90404, USA. ejegmd@aol.com

OBJECTIVE: To study the relative frequency of bacterial isolates cultured from community-acquired foot infections and assess their comparative in vitro susceptibility to sparfloxacin, levofloxacin, and eight other commonly used oral antimicrobial agents. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This is a prospective study in which the infected wounds of 25 consecutive diabetic patients seen by one of the authors were cultured as they entered the hospital. Isolates were stored and tested for susceptibility to 10 oral antimicrobial agents using the agar dilution method. RESULTS: Staphylococcus aurcus was the most common isolate (76% of patients), including methicillin-resistant S. aurcus (MRSA) in 5 of 25 (20%) patient wounds. Streptococci, enterococci, Enterobacteriaceae, and anaerobes were also present in > or = 40% of patient wounds. Sparfloxacin and levofloxacin were the most active agents tested with activity against > or = 88% of isolates. Isolates resistant to sparfloxacin and levofloxacin included MRSA, enterococci, and some anaerobes. When analyzed by prior exposure to antibiotics, patients who had previously received oral antibiotics were more likely to have MRSA, enterococci, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated and less likely to have Enterobacteriaceae and anaerobes isolated from their wounds. CONCLUSIONS: MRSA and enterococci are now a common cause of diabetic foot infections, and the increased prevalence may be due to antimicrobial use. These wounds may require use of combined antimicrobial therapy for initial outpatient management. The new fluoroquinolones, sparfloxacin and levofloxacin, were the most active oral agents tested.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
QJMHome page
M.P. Khanolkar, S.C. Bain, and J.W. Stephens
The diabetic foot
QJM, March 18, 2008; (2008) hcn027v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
E. J. C. Goldstein, D. M. Citron, C. V. Merriam, Y. A. Warren, K. L. Tyrrell, and H. T. Fernandez
In Vitro Activities of Doripenem and Six Comparator Drugs against 423 Aerobic and Anaerobic Bacterial Isolates from Infected Diabetic Foot Wounds
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., February 1, 2008; 52(2): 761 - 766.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
B. A. Lipsky, P. Giordano, S. Choudhri, and J. Song
Treating diabetic foot infections with sequential intravenous to oral moxifloxacin compared with piperacillin-tazobactam/amoxicillin-clavulanate
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., August 1, 2007; 60(2): 370 - 376.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
E. J. C. Goldstein, D. M. Citron, C. V. Merriam, Y. A. Warren, K. L. Tyrrell, and H. T. Fernandez
In Vitro Activity of Ceftobiprole against Aerobic and Anaerobic Strains Isolated from Diabetic Foot Infections
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., November 1, 2006; 50(11): 3959 - 3962.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
E. J. C. Goldstein, D. M. Citron, Y. A. Warren, K. L. Tyrrell, C. V. Merriam, and H. T. Fernandez
In Vitro Activities of Dalbavancin and 12 Other Agents against 329 Aerobic and Anaerobic Gram-Positive Isolates Recovered from Diabetic Foot Infections.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., August 1, 2006; 50(8): 2875 - 2879.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
R. Gadepalli, B. Dhawan, V. Sreenivas, A. Kapil, A.C. Ammini, and R. Chaudhry
A Clinico-microbiological Study of Diabetic Foot Ulcers in an Indian Tertiary Care Hospital
Diabetes Care, August 1, 2006; 29(8): 1727 - 1732.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc.Home page
B. A. Lipsky, A. R. Berendt, H. G. Deery, J. M. Embil, W. S. Joseph, A. W. Karchmer, J. L. LeFrock, D. P. Lew, J. T. Mader, C. Norden, et al.
Diagnosis and Treatment of Diabetic Foot Infections
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc, March 1, 2005; 95(2): 183 - 210.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Diabetes Diabetes Care Clinical Diabetes Diabetes Spectrum
Copyright © 1996 by the American Diabetes Association.