Diabetes Care
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by O'Sullivan, J. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by O'Sullivan, J. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Diabetes Care, Vol 2, Issue 2 85-90, Copyright © 1979 by American Diabetes Association


ARTICLES

Prevalence and course of diabetes modified by fasting blood glucose levels: implications for diagnostic criteria

JB O'Sullivan

Data from the epidemiologic survey in Sudbury, Massachusetts, demonstrate that the prevalence of new cases of diabetes, based on the USPHS criteria for the standard 3-h oral glucose tolerance test as originally published, was 0.7%. If a fasting blood sugar greater than or equal to 110 mg/dl had been required for those USPH diagnoses, the prevalence would have fallen to 0.28%. Further, if a peak serum insulin level of less than or greater than 60 microM/ml had been required, the original prevalence rate would have dropped to 0.02%. Data from a prospeh criteria for diabetes indicate by life table analyses that 41% show further deterioration of carbohydrate control over the first 13 yr of the study when the fasting blood sugar was less than 110 mg/dl in the initial diagnostic test and 82% when the fasting blood sugar was greater than or equal to 110 mg/dl. The relationship of fasting blood glucose to later decompensation proved to be a continuous one without evidence of a threshold effect. The implications of both of these studies for diagnostic criteria, particularly recent proposals, is discussed.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Diabetes Diabetes Care Clinical Diabetes Diabetes Spectrum
Copyright © 1979 by the American Diabetes Association.