Diabetes Care
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hoeldtke, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Lernmark, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hoeldtke, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Lernmark, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Diabetes Care, Vol 20, Issue 12 1900-1903, Copyright © 1997 by American Diabetes Association


ARTICLES

Antibodies to GAD and glycemic control in recent-onset IDDM

RD Hoeldtke, KD Bryner, GG Horvath, MR Byerly, GR Hobbs, SM Marcovina and A Lernmark
Department of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown 26506-9159, USA. bmusick@wvudeptmed1.hsc.wvu.edu

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the effect of antibodies to glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD65Ab) and islet cells (ICA512Ab) on glycemic control early in IDDM. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: GAD65Ab and ICA512Ab were measured twice in 35 patients (10 male, 25 female; age 10-40 years) initially within 2 years of diagnosis and again 1 year later. The glycosylated hemoglobin was measured one to four times each year, and the average glycosylated hemoglobin for the preceding year was calculated each time the antibodies were measured. RESULTS: The mean HbA1 at the time of the initial evaluation was 8.04 +/- 0.30 (reference range 4.7-7.3% for nondiabetic patients), the average GAD65Ab index was 0.735 +/- 0.306, and the mean ICA512Ab index was 1.94 +/- 0.65. The GAD65Ab index correlated with HbA1 (r = 0.41, P < 0.025), whereas the ICA512Ab index did not (r = 0.13). One year later, the mean GAD65Ab index was 0.94 +/- 0.34, the mean ICA512Ab index was 1.04 +/- 0.40, and the mean HbA1 was 9.03 +/- 0.30. The GAD65Ab index correlated with HbA1 (r = 0.61 P < 0.001), whereas the ICA512Ab index did not (r = -0.06). Stratification of patients into tertiles according to the average GAD65 index revealed, at the follow-up evaluation, that the better glycemic control in the lowest GAD65Ab tertile was accomplished with significantly less insulin (0.43 +/- 0.08 U/kg for the lowest tertile vs. 0.71 +/- 0.09 and 0.64 +/- 0.09 for the middle and highest tertiles, respectively; P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In summary, patients with IDDM and low GAD65Ab have better glycemic control even though they require less insulin. The ICA512Ab index, however, fails to correlate with glycemia.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
A. I. Vinik, D. Anandacoomaraswamy, and J. Ullal
Antibodies to Neuronal Structures: Innocent bystanders or neurotoxins?
Diabetes Care, August 1, 2005; 28(8): 2067 - 2072.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
R. D. Hoeldtke, K. D. Bryner, G. R. Hobbs, G. G. Horvath, J. E. Riggs, I. Christie, G. Ganser, S. M. Marcovina, and A. Lernmark
Antibodies to Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase and Peripheral Nerve Function in Type 1 Diabetes
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2000; 85(9): 3297 - 3308.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
A. Lernmark
Type 1 Diabetes
Clin. Chem., August 1, 1999; 45(8): 1331 - 1338.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Diabetes Diabetes Care Clinical Diabetes Diabetes Spectrum
Copyright © 1997 by the American Diabetes Association.