|
Diabetes Care, Vol 21, Issue 11 1897-1903, Copyright © 1998 by American Diabetes Association
A randomized placebo-controlled trial of repaglinide in the treatment of type 2 diabetes
RB Goldberg, D Einhorn, CP Lucas, MS Rendell, P Damsbo, WC Huang, P Strange and RG Brodows
Diabetes Research Institute, University of Miami School of Medicine, Florida 33136, USA.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to assess the efficacy and safety
of repaglinide compared with placebo in the treatment of patients with type
2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a phase II multicenter,
double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, dose-adjustment and
maintenance trial. After screening and a 2-week washout period, 99 patients
were randomized to receive either repaglinide (n = 66) or placebo (n = 33).
Patients underwent 6 weeks of dose adjustment followed by 12 weeks of dose
maintenance. Fasting and stimulated glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), plasma
glucose, insulin, and C-peptide were measured at predetermined intervals.
Adverse events and hypoglycemic episodes were recorded. RESULTS: From
baseline to last visit, mean HbA1c decreased from 8.5 to 7.8% in patients
treated with repaglinide and increased from 8.1 to 9.3% in patients
receiving placebo, with a statistically significant difference of - 1.7% (P
< 0.0001) between treatment groups at the last visit. Mean fasting
plasma glucose and postprandial glucose increased in patients receiving
placebo and decreased in patients treated with repaglinide, with
statistically significant (P < 0.01) differences between groups at the
last visit. Concentrations of fasting and postprandial insulin and
C-peptide were lower at the last visit compared with baseline for patients
treated with placebo and higher for patients treated with repaglinide, and
the differences between groups were statistically significant (P <
0.05). Overall, repaglinide was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: This study
demonstrated that repaglinide was safe and efficacious in lowering blood
glucose concentrations. In addition to overall improvement in glycemic
control noted with repaglinide in both sulfonylurea-treated patients and
oral hypoglycemic agent-naive patients, repaglinide had a potent
glucose-lowering effect in the postprandial period.

CiteULike Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Selvin, S. Bolen, H.-C. Yeh, C. Wiley, L. M. Wilson, S. S. Marinopoulos, L. Feldman, J. Vassy, R. Wilson, E. B. Bass, et al.
Cardiovascular Outcomes in Trials of Oral Diabetes Medications: A Systematic Review
Arch Intern Med,
October 27, 2008;
168(19):
2070 - 2080.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Kimmel and S. E. Inzucchi
Oral Agents for Type 2 Diabetes: An Update
Clin. Diabetes,
April 1, 2005;
23(2):
64 - 76.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J.-F. Yale
Oral Antihyperglycemic Agents and Renal Disease: New Agents, New Concepts
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.,
March 1, 2005;
16(3_suppl_1):
S7 - S10.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. J. Abrahamson
Optimal Glycemic Control in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Fasting and Postprandial Glucose in Context
Arch Intern Med,
March 8, 2004;
164(5):
486 - 491.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. E. Gerich
Clinical Significance, Pathogenesis, and Management of Postprandial Hyperglycemia
Arch Intern Med,
June 9, 2003;
163(11):
1306 - 1316.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Davidson
Should Postprandial Glucose Be Measured and Treated to a Particular Target? Yes.
Diabetes Care,
June 1, 2003;
26(6):
1919 - 1921.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. S. Thomsen, D. Chassard, E. Evene, K. K. Nielsen, and M. Jorgensen
Pharmacokinetics of Repaglinide in Healthy Caucasian and Japanese Subjects
J. Clin. Pharmacol.,
January 1, 2003;
43(1):
23 - 28.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. G. Parkin and N. Brooks
Is Postprandial Glucose Control Important? Is It Practical In Primary Care Settings?
Clin. Diabetes,
April 1, 2002;
20(2):
71 - 76.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
O. Schmitz, S. Lund, P. H. Andersen, M. Jonler, and N. Porksen
Optimizing Insulin Secretagogue Therapy in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A randomized double-blind study with repaglinide
Diabetes Care,
February 1, 2002;
25(2):
342 - 346.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. E. Inzucchi
Oral Antihyperglycemic Therapy for Type 2 Diabetes: Scientific Review
JAMA,
January 16, 2002;
287(3):
360 - 372.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Saleh and G. Grunberger
Hypoglycemia: An Excuse for Poor Glycemic Control?
Clin. Diabetes,
October 1, 2001;
19(4):
161 - 167.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. A. de Luis, R. Aller, L. Cuellar, C. Terroba, H. Ovalle, O. Izaola, and E. Romero
Effect of Repaglinide Addition to NPH Insulin Monotherapy on Glycemic Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes
Diabetes Care,
October 1, 2001;
24(10):
1844 - 1845.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. M. Gribble, S. E. Manley, and J. C. Levy
Randomized Dose Ranging Study of the Reduction of Fasting and Postprandial Glucose in Type 2 Diabetes by Nateglinide (A-4166)
Diabetes Care,
July 1, 2001;
24(7):
1221 - 1225.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. G. Moses, R. Gomis, K. B. Frandsen, J.-L. Schlienger, and I. Dedov
Flexible Meal-Related Dosing With Repaglinide Facilitates Glycemic Control in Therapy-Naive Type 2 Diabetes
Diabetes Care,
January 1, 2001;
24(1):
11 - 15.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 1998 by the American Diabetes Association.
|
|
| |
|