Diabetes Care, Vol 21, Issue 11 2007-2015, Copyright © 1998 by American Diabetes Association

ARTICLES

Improved visual function in IDDM patients with unchanged cumulative incidence of sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy

K Rossing, P Jacobsen, P Rossing, E Lauritzen, H Lund-Andersen and HH Parving
Steno Diabetes Center, Gentofte, Denmark.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate trends in visual acuity and the cumulative incidence of diabetic retinopathy in a clinic-based observational follow-up study. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: All patients visiting Hvidore Hospital in 1984 whose diagnosis of IDDM had been made before 41 years of age and between 1965 and 1979 (n = 356) were followed until 1994 or until their deaths. All patients were Caucasians and resided in Copenhagen. Patients were divided into three prevalence cohorts based on time of diabetes onset: group A, 1965-1969 (n = 113); group B, 1970-1974 (n = 130); and group C, 1975-1979 (n = 113). RESULTS: Fifteen years after diabetes onset, the visual acuity was significantly improved in patients with increasing calendar year of the disease onset. The median (interquartile range) visual acuity was 1.0 (0.8-1.0), 1.0(0.9-1.0), and 1.0 (1.0-1.0) in groups A, B, and C, respectively (P < 0.01 overall; P = 0.28 for group A vs. group B; and P < 0.01 for group A vs. group C) with 60, 66, and 93 having a visual acuity of 1.0 in groups A, B, and C, respectively. The cumulative incidence (+/-SEM), expressed as a percentage and calculated according to the life-table method, of proliferative retinopathy, maculopathy, and laser-treated retinopathy 15 years after onset of diabetes were, respectively, 13+/-3, 11+/-3, and 12+/-3 in group A; 16+/-3, 12+/-3, and 21+/-4 in group B; 11+/-3, 5+/-2, and 12+/-3 in group C, respectively (NS). The development of proliferative retinopathy was associated with the degree of retinopathy and albuminuria at baseline and the mean HbA1c during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The study revealed an improvement in visual acuity with increasing calendar year of diabetes onset but an unchanged cumulative incidence of diabetic retinopathy.
CiteULike    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. Hietala, C. Forsblom, P. Summanen, P.-H. Groop, and on behalf of the FinnDiane Study Group Heritability of Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy Diabetes, August 1, 2008; 57(8): 2176 - 2180. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Pambianco, T. Costacou, D. Ellis, D. J. Becker, R. Klein, and T. J. Orchard The 30-year natural history of type 1 diabetes complications: the pittsburgh epidemiology of diabetes complications study experience. Diabetes, May 1, 2006; 55(5): 1463 - 1469. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Hovind, L. Tarnow, K. Rossing, P. Rossing, S. Eising, N. Larsen, C. Binder, and H.-H. Parving Decreasing Incidence of Severe Diabetic Microangiopathy in Type 1 Diabetes Diabetes Care, April 1, 2003; 26(4): 1258 - 1264. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Larsen, J. Godt, M. Grunkin, H. Lund-Andersen, and M. Larsen Automated Detection of Diabetic Retinopathy in a Fundus Photographic Screening Population Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., February 1, 2003; 44(2): 767 - 771. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]