Diabetes Care, Vol 23, Issue 6 759-764, Copyright © 2000 by American Diabetes Association

ARTICLES

Capture-recapture method in the epidemiology of type 2 diabetes: a contribution from the Verona Diabetes Study

G Verlato and M Muggeo
Medical Statistics, University of Verona Medical School, Italy. giuseppe@biometria.univr.it

OBJECTIVE: The present investigation used data from the Verona Diabetes Study to verify a main assumption of the capture-recapture method (source independence) and to characterize the subgroup of known diabetic patients missed by all sources whose number is estimated by the capture-recapture method. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The Verona Diabetes Study identified 7,148 type 2 diabetic patients on 31 December 1986 using 3 different sources: family physicians, a diabetes center, and a drug prescription database. Completeness of ascertainment was estimated with traditional methods based on the hypergeometric distribution and with a log-linear model. RESULTS: Identification sources were not independent because the drug prescription database was positively related to family physicians and negatively related to the diabetes center (P < 0.001). Thus, completeness of ascertainment was overestimated (87.5% [95% CI 86.3-88.8]) when using only family physicians and the drug prescription database and underestimated (45.9% [43.9-48.1]) when using only the diabetes center and the drug prescription database. Because of characteristics contributing to variable "catchability" (probability of ascertainment), the estimated proportion of ascertainment increased with increasing time since diagnosis from 65.6% in the first tertile (<6 years) to 91.5% in the third tertile (>12 years); moreover, the ascertainment was estimated to be nearly complete (97.9%) for insulin-treated patients and scanty (28.9%) for diet-treated patients. CONCLUSIONS: Because identification sources are likely to be dependent, the capture-recapture method should be used with caution in diabetes epidemiology and possibly when at least 3 sources are available. The subgroup of diabetic patients whose existence is inferred by this technique likely consists of newly diagnosed patients with mild disease severity.
CiteULike    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. Vehik, R. F. Hamman, D. Lezotte, J. M. Norris, G. J. Klingensmith, M. Rewers, and D. Dabelea Trends in High-Risk HLA Susceptibility Genes Among Colorado Youth With Type 1 Diabetes Diabetes Care, July 1, 2008; 31(7): 1392 - 1396. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				The Writing Group for the SEARCH for Diabetes in Y Incidence of Diabetes in Youth in the United States JAMA, June 27, 2007; 297(24): 2716 - 2724. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Vehik, R. F. Hamman, D. Lezotte, J. M. Norris, G. Klingensmith, C. Bloch, M. Rewers, and D. Dabelea Increasing Incidence of Type 1 Diabetes in 0- to 17-Year-Old Colorado Youth Diabetes Care, March 1, 2007; 30(3): 503 - 509. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study Group The Burden of Diabetes Mellitus Among US Youth: Prevalence Estimates From the SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study Pediatrics, October 1, 2006; 118(4): 1510 - 1518. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Verlato, G. Zoppini, E. Bonora, and M. Muggeo Mortality From Site-Specific Malignancies in Type 2 Diabetic Patients From Verona Diabetes Care, April 1, 2003; 26(4): 1047 - 1051. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]