Diabetes Care 24:983-988, 2001
© 2001 by the American Diabetes Association, Inc.
Clinical Care/Education/Nutrition Original Article |
Importance of Early Insulin Secretion
Comparison of nateglinide and glyburide in previously diet-treated patients with type 2 diabetes
Priscilla A. Hollander, MD, PHD1,
Sherwyn L. Schwartz, MD2,
Marjorie R. Gatlin, MD3,
Stephen J. Haas, BS3,
Hongjie Zheng, BS3,
James E. Foley, PHD3 and
Beth E. Dunning, PHD3
1 Ruth Collins Diabetes Center, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
2 Diabetes and Glandular Disease Clinic, San Antonio, Texas
3 Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, New Jersey
OBJECTIVEThis study compared the effects of nateglinide, glyburide, and placebo on postmeal glucose excursions and insulin secretion in previously diet-treated patients with type 2 diabetes.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODSThis randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter study was conducted in 152 patients who received either nateglinide (120 mg before three meals daily, n = 51), glyburide (5 mg q.d. titrated to 10 mg q.d. after 2 weeks, n = 50), or placebo (n = 51) for 8 weeks. Glucose, insulin, and C-peptide profiles during liquid meal challenges were measured at weeks 0 and 8. At weeks -1 and 7, 19-point daytime glucose and insulin profiles, comprising three solid meals, were measured.
RESULTSDuring the liquid-meal challenge, nateglinide reduced the incremental glucose area under the curve (AUC) more effectively than glyburide ( = -4.94 vs. -2.71 mmol · h/l, P < 0.05), whereas glyburide reduced fasting plasma glucose more effectively than nateglinide ( = -2.9 vs. -1.0 mmol/l, respectively, P < 0.001). In contrast, C-peptide induced by glyburide was greater than that induced by nateglinide ( = +1.83 vs. +0.95 nmol · h/l, P < 0.01), and only glyburide increased fasting insulin levels. During the solid meal challenges, nateglinide and glyburide elicited similar overall glucose control ( 12-h incremental AUC = -13.2 vs. -15.3 mmol · h/l), but the insulin AUC induced by nateglinide was significantly less than that induced by glyburide ( 12-h AUC = +866 vs. +1,702 pmol · h/l, P = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONSThis study demonstrated that nateglinide selectively enhanced early insulin release and provided better mealtime glucose control with less total insulin exposure than glyburide.
Abbreviations: AUC, area under the curve FPG, fasting plasma glucose

CiteULike Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Shigeto, M. Katsura, M. Matsuda, S. Ohkuma, and K. Kaku
Nateglinide and Mitiglinide, but Not Sulfonylureas, Induce Insulin Secretion through a Mechanism Mediated by Calcium Release from Endoplasmic Reticulum
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.,
July 1, 2007;
322(1):
1 - 7.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. S. Gangji, T. Cukierman, H. C. Gerstein, C. H. Goldsmith, and C. M. Clase
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Hypoglycemia and Cardiovascular Events: A comparison of glyburide with other secretagogues and with insulin
Diabetes Care,
February 1, 2007;
30(2):
389 - 394.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Tuomi, E. H. Honkanen, B. Isomaa, L. Sarelin, and L. C. Groop
Improved Prandial Glucose Control With Lower Risk of Hypoglycemia With Nateglinide Than With Glibenclamide in Patients With Maturity-Onset Diabetes of the Young Type 3
Diabetes Care,
February 1, 2006;
29(2):
189 - 194.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. C. Riddle and D. J. Drucker
Emerging Therapies Mimicking the Effects of Amylin and Glucagon-Like Peptide 1
Diabetes Care,
February 1, 2006;
29(2):
435 - 449.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Gerich, P. Raskin, L. Jean-Louis, D. Purkayastha, and M. A. Baron
PRESERVE-{beta}: Two-year efficacy and safety of initial combination therapy with nateglinide or glyburide plus metformin
Diabetes Care,
September 1, 2005;
28(9):
2093 - 2099.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Abletshauser, P. Brunel, K.-H. Usadel, and M. Hanefeld
Effect of nateglinide and glimepiride in reducing postprandial hyperglycaemia in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
The British Journal of Diabetes & Vascular Disease,
March 1, 2005;
5(2):
93 - 99.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. F. Carroll, A. Gutierrez, M. Castro, D. Tsewang, and D. S. Schade
Targeting Postprandial Hyperglycemia: A Comparative Study of Insulinotropic Agents in Type 2 Diabetes
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.,
November 1, 2003;
88(11):
5248 - 5254.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. M. Eddy and L. Schlessinger
Archimedes: A trial-validated model of diabetes
Diabetes Care,
November 1, 2003;
26(11):
3093 - 3101.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
{blacktriangledown}Nateglinide and {blacktriangledown}repaglinide for type 2 diabetes?
DTB,
July 1, 2003;
41(7):
52 - 54.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Del Prato, R. J. Heine, L. Keilson, C. Guitard, S. G. Shen, and R. P. Emmons
Treatment of Patients Over 64 Years of Age With Type 2 Diabetes: Experience from nateglinide pooled database retrospective analysis
Diabetes Care,
July 1, 2003;
26(7):
2075 - 2080.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. T. Sheehan
Current Therapeutic Options in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Practical Approach
Clin. Med. Res.,
July 1, 2003;
1(3):
189 - 200.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Fonseca, G. Grunberger, S. Gupta, S. Shen, and J. E. Foley
Addition of Nateglinide to Rosiglitazone Monotherapy Suppresses Mealtime Hyperglycemia and Improves Overall Glycemic Control
Diabetes Care,
June 1, 2003;
26(6):
1685 - 1690.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Saloranta, C. Guitard, E. Pecher, P. de Pablos-Velasco, K. Lahti, P. Brunel, and L. Groop
Nateglinide Improves Early Insulin Secretion and Controls Postprandial Glucose Excursions in a Prediabetic Population
Diabetes Care,
December 1, 2002;
25(12):
2141 - 2146.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. F. Carroll, A. Izard, K. Riboni, M. R. Burge, and D. S. Schade
Control of Postprandial Hyperglycemia: Optimal use of short-acting insulin secretagogues
Diabetes Care,
December 1, 2002;
25(12):
2147 - 2152.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Saloranta, K. Hershon, M. Ball, S. Dickinson, and D. Holmes
Efficacy and Safety of Nateglinide in Type 2 Diabetic Patients with Modest Fasting Hyperglycemia
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.,
September 1, 2002;
87(9):
4171 - 4176.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Rosenstock, S. G. Shen, M. R. Gatlin, and J. E. Foley
Combination Therapy With Nateglinide and a Thiazolidinedione Improves Glycemic Control in Type 2 Diabetes
Diabetes Care,
September 1, 2002;
25(9):
1529 - 1533.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. S. Cozma, S. D. Luzio, G. J. Dunseath, K. W. Langendorg, T. Pieber, and D. R. Owens
Comparison of the Effects of Three Insulinotropic Drugs on Plasma Insulin Levels After a Standard Meal
Diabetes Care,
August 1, 2002;
25(8):
1271 - 1276.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. M. Cohen and B. A. Ramlo-Halsted
How Do the New Insulin Secretagogues Compare?
Diabetes Care,
August 1, 2002;
25(8):
1472 - 1473.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Schweizer, M. Ball, D. R Owens, F. Cressier, D. O Holmes, and P. Brunel
Comparison of the postprandial glucose and insulin profiles with nateglinide and gliclazide in type 2 diabetic patients
The British Journal of Diabetes & Vascular Disease,
May 1, 2002;
2(3):
228 - 232.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Saleh and G. Grunberger
Hypoglycemia: An Excuse for Poor Glycemic Control?
Clin. Diabetes,
October 1, 2001;
19(4):
161 - 167.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2001 by the American Diabetes Association.
|
|
| |
|