|
 |
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
© 2002 by the American Diabetes Association, Inc.
Epidemiology/Health Services/Psychosocial Research |
Variation in Diabetes Care Among States
Do patient characteristics matter?
1 Army Medical Surveillance Activity, Washington, DC
2 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Baltimore, Maryland
3 Delmarva Foundation for Medical Care, Inc., Easton, Maryland
4 Texas Medical Foundation, Austin, Texas
OBJECTIVE—To examine state variability in diabetes care for Medicare beneficiaries and the impact of certain beneficiary characteristics on those variations.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—Medicare beneficiaries with diabetes, aged 18–75 years, were identified from 1997 to 1999 claims data. Claims data were used to construct rates for three quality of care measures (HbA1c tests, eye examinations, and lipid profiles). Person-level variables (e.g., age, sex, race, and socioeconomic status) were used to adjust state rates using logistic regression.
RESULTS—A third of 2 million beneficiaries with diabetes aged 18–75 years did not have annual HbA1c tests, biennial eye examinations, or biennial lipid profiles. There was wide variability in the measures among states (e.g., receipt of HbA1c tests ranged from 52 to 83%). Adjustment using person-level variables reduced the variance in HbA1c tests, eye examinations, and lipid profiles by 30, 23, and 27%, respectively, but considerable variability remained. The impact of the adjustment variables was also inconsistent across measures.
CONCLUSIONS—Opportunities remain for improvement in diabetes care. Large variations in care among states were reduced significantly by adjustment for characteristics of state residents. However, much variability remained unexplained. Variability of measures within states and variable impact of the adjustment variables argues against systems effects operating with uniformity on the three measures. These findings suggest that a single approach to quality improvement is unlikely to be effective. Further understanding variability will be important to improving quality.
Abbreviations: CMS, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services • DQIP, Diabetes Quality Improvement Project • ESRD, end-stage renal disease • QIO, quality improvement organization • ZQ, zip quality
CiteULike 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  L. S. Phillips and J. G. Twombly It's Time to Overcome Clinical Inertia Ann Intern Med, May 20, 2008; 148(10): 783 - 785. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. E. Peek, A. Cargill, and E. S. Huang Diabetes Health Disparities: A Systematic Review of Health Care Interventions Med Care Res Rev, October 1, 2007; 64(5_suppl): 101S - 156S. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H. Alberti, N. Boudriga, and M. Nabli "Damm Sokkor": Factors Associated With the Quality of Care of Patients With Diabetes: A study in primary care in Tunisia Diabetes Care, August 1, 2007; 30(8): 2013 - 2018. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. F. Brown, S. L. Ettner, J. Piette, M. Weinberger, E. Gregg, M. F. Shapiro, A. J. Karter, M. Safford, B. Waitzfelder, P. A. Prata, et al. Socioeconomic Position and Health among Persons with Diabetes Mellitus: A Conceptual Framework and Review of the Literature Epidemiol. Rev., July 1, 2004; 26(1): 63 - 77. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. F. Schaars, P. Denig, W. N. Kasje, R. E. Stewart, B. H.R. Wolffenbuttel, and F. M. Haaijer-Ruskamp Physician, Organizational, and Patient Factors Associated With Suboptimal Blood Pressure Management in Type 2 Diabetic Patients in Primary Care Diabetes Care, January 1, 2004; 27(1): 123 - 128. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. G. Solomon Reducing Cardiovascular Risk in Type 2 Diabetes N. Engl. J. Med., January 30, 2003; 348(5): 457 - 459. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Diabetes | Diabetes Care | Clinical Diabetes | Diabetes Spectrum |