Diabetes Care
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ellison, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Horwitz, D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ellison, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Horwitz, D. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Diabetes Care 25:961-964, 2002
© 2002 by the American Diabetes Association, Inc.


Clinical Care/Education/Nutrition
Original Article

Rapid Changes in Postprandial Blood Glucose Produce Concentration Differences at Finger, Forearm, and Thigh Sampling Sites

John M. Ellison, MS, Janet M. Stegmann, BS, Sandra L. Colner, BS, Ragui H. Michael, MD, Manoj K. Sharma, PHD, Kenneth R. Ervin, MS and David L. Horwitz, MD, PHD

LifeScan, Milpitas, California

OBJECTIVE—To compare pre- and postmeal capillary blood glucose concentrations measured at the finger, forearm, and thigh in adults with diabetes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—For phase 1, capillary blood glucose concentrations were measured at six time points (premeal and at ~60, 90, 120, 150, and 180 min postmeal) using a blood glucose monitoring system and technician-obtained samples collected from finger, forearm, and thigh sites of 42 adults with diabetes. The finger samples were also tested with a laboratory instrument. For phase 2, ~14 weeks later, the testing procedures were repeated with 38 subjects from the original study population.

RESULTS—Meter finger results were accurate at all time points. Alternate sites tended to produce lower glucose readings compared to finger readings at times when glucose was increasing rapidly (60 and 90 min postmeal). Forearm-to-finger differences correlated with rates of glucose change (r = 0.56, P < 0.001), as did the thigh-to-finger differences (r = 0.52, P < 0.001). Other factors, such as subject age, BMI, diabetes type, and insulin dependence did not have a significant impact on site differences. When the testing procedures were repeated with the same subjects, the pattern of site differences was consistent, although individual results were variable.

CONCLUSIONS—Changes in blood glucose immediately after a meal may be identified at finger sites before detection at forearm or thigh sites. Alternate site testing appears to be a useful option for routine self-monitoring before meals; however, patients and clinicians should recognize that results may be different from fingertip results when glucose levels are changing rapidly.

Abbreviations: PD, percentage difference • SMBG, self-monitoring of blood glucose


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin Nurs ResHome page
P. Anzalone
Equivalence of Earlobe Site Blood Glucose Testing With Finger Stick
Clin Nurs Res, November 1, 2008; 17(4): 251 - 261.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
J. C Brand-Miller, K. Fatima, C. Middlemiss, M. Bare, V. Liu, F. Atkinson, and P. Petocz
Effect of alcoholic beverages on postprandial glycemia and insulinemia in lean, young, healthy adults
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, June 1, 2007; 85(6): 1545 - 1551.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
J. Mahoney and J. Ellison
Assessing the Quality of Glucose Monitor Studies: A Critical Evaluation of Published Reports
Clin. Chem., June 1, 2007; 53(6): 1122 - 1128.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Health Syst PharmHome page
S. M. Rivers, M. P. Kane, G. Bakst, R. S. Busch, and R. A. Hamilton
Precision and accuracy of two blood glucose meters: FreeStyle Flash versus One Touch Ultra.
Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., August 1, 2006; 63(15): 1411 - 1416.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
C. D. Saudek, R. L. Derr, and R. R. Kalyani
Assessing Glycemia in Diabetes Using Self-monitoring Blood Glucose and Hemoglobin A1c
JAMA, April 12, 2006; 295(14): 1688 - 1697.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
N. Lucidarme, C. Alberti, I. Zaccaria, E. Claude, and N. Tubiana-Rufi
Alternate-Site Testing Is Reliable in Children and Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes, Except at the Forearm for Hypoglycemia Detection
Diabetes Care, March 1, 2005; 28(3): 710 - 711.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
T. C. Dunn, R. C. Eastman, and J. A. Tamada
Rates of Glucose Change Measured by Blood Glucose Meter and the GlucoWatch Biographer During Day, Night, and Around Mealtimes
Diabetes Care, September 1, 2004; 27(9): 2161 - 2165.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
D. E. Goldstein, R. R. Little, R. A. Lorenz, J. I. Malone, D. Nathan, C. M. Peterson, and D. B. Sacks
Tests of Glycemia in Diabetes
Diabetes Care, July 1, 2004; 27(7): 1761 - 1773.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Pharmacy PracticeHome page
G. Vincze and A. Parthan
The Value of Home Monitoring Kits in Diabetes, Hypertension, Asthma, and Oral Anticoagulation Therapy
Journal of Pharmacy Practice, June 1, 2004; 17(3): 182 - 196.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
K. Arimoto, H. Sasaki, K. Ogawa, H. Yamasaki, K. Okamoto, H. Furuta, T. Hanabusa, M. Nishi, T. Nakao, and K. Nanjo
Negative Pressure Suction During Blood Sampling May Reduce the Difference in Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose Results Between Fingertip Pricking and Forearm Pricking
Diabetes Care, June 1, 2004; 27(6): 1449 - 1450.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
S Greenhalgh, S Bradshaw, C M Hall, and D A Price
Forearm blood glucose testing in diabetes mellitus
Arch. Dis. Child., June 1, 2004; 89(6): 516 - 518.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Pharmacy PracticeHome page
A. L. Briggs and S. Cornell
Self-monitoring Blood Glucose (SMBG): Now and the Future
Journal of Pharmacy Practice, February 1, 2004; 17(1): 29 - 38.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
C. Stavrianos and E. Anastasiou
Oral Glucose Tolerance Test Evaluation With Forearm and Fingertip Glucose Measurements in Pregnant Women
Diabetes Care, February 1, 2004; 27(2): 627 - 628.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
D. M. Bina, R. L. Anderson, M. L. Johnson, R. M. Bergenstal, and D. M. Kendall
Clinical Impact of Prandial State, Exercise, and Site Preparation on the Equivalence of Alternative-Site Blood Glucose Testing
Diabetes Care, April 1, 2003; 26(4): 981 - 985.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
P. R. van der Valk, I. van der Schatte Olivier-Steding, K.-J. C. Wientjes, A. J. Schoonen, and K. Hoogenberg
Alternative-Site Blood Glucose Measurement at the Abdomen
Diabetes Care, November 1, 2002; 25(11): 2114 - 2115.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Diabetes Diabetes Care Clinical Diabetes Diabetes Spectrum
Copyright © 2002 by the American Diabetes Association.