Diabetes Care
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mudaliar, S.
Right arrow Articles by Henry, R. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mudaliar, S.
Right arrow Articles by Henry, R. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Diabetes Care 25:1597-1602, 2002
© 2002 by the American Diabetes Association, Inc.


Emerging Treatments and Technologies
Original Article

Intravenous Glargine and Regular Insulin Have Similar Effects on Endogenous Glucose Output and Peripheral Activation/Deactivation Kinetic Profiles

Sunder Mudaliar, MD1,2, Pharis Mohideen, MD1,2, Reena Deutsch, PHD2,3, Theodore P. Ciaraldi, PHD2, Debra Armstrong, BS1, Bo Kim, PHARMD4, Xue Sha, MD4 and Robert R. Henry, MD1,2

1 VA San Diego Healthcare System, La Jolla, California
2 Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California
3 Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California
4 Aventis Pharmaceuticals, Bridgwater, New Jersey

OBJECTIVE—To compare the effects of intravenously administered long-acting insulin analog glargine and regular human insulin on activation and deactivation of endogenous glucose output (EGO) and peripheral glucose uptake.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—In this single-center, randomized, double-blind, crossover euglycemic glucose clamp study, 15 healthy male volunteers (aged 27 ± 4 years, BMI 24.2 ± 0.7 kg/m2 [mean ± SE]) received a primed continuous intravenous infusion of 40 mU/m2 of insulin glargine or regular human insulin on 2 different study days in a randomized order. Euglycemia was maintained at 90 mg/dl using a simultaneous variable intravenous infusion of 20% dextrose containing D-[3-3H]glucose. EGO and peripheral glucose disposal kinetics were determined during a 4-h insulin infusion activation period and a 3-h deactivation period.

RESULTS—The results demonstrated no significant difference in activation or deactivation kinetics with respect to EGO and peripheral glucose disposal between insulin glargine and regular human insulin when given intravenously. The mean ± SE time required for 50% suppression of EGO after insulin infusion was 73 ± 23 min for regular insulin and 57 ± 20 min for insulin glargine (NS). The mean maximum rate of glucose disposal was 10.10 ± 0.77 and 9.90 ± 0.85 mg · kg-1 · min-1 for regular insulin and insulin glargine, respectively (NS). The mean time required for 50% suppression of incremental glucose disposal rate (GDR), defined as the time required for activation from the basal glucose disappearance rate (Rd) to half-maximum insulin-stimulated Rd, was 32 ± 5 and 42 ± 10 min for regular insulin and insulin glargine, respectively (NS). The time required for deactivation from maximum insulin-stimulated GDR to half-maximum GDR after cessation of insulin infusion was 63 ± 5 and 57 ± 4 min for regular insulin and insulin glargine, respectively (NS).

CONCLUSIONS—Activation and deactivation kinetics of EGO and peripheral glucose uptake as well as absolute disposal rate are similar between regular human insulin and insulin glargine when administered intravenously. Thus, the various biological actions of these insulin preparations when given subcutaneously are completely due to their different absorption kinetics.

Abbreviations: A50EGO, time required for 50% suppression of endogenous glucose output after insulin infusion • A50IGDR, time from basal Rd to half-maximum insulin-stimulated Rd • D50EGO, time required to achieve 50% deactivation from maximum insulin-induced suppression of endogenous glucose output after cessation of insulin infusion • D50IGDR, time required for deactivation from maximum insulin-stimulated glucose disposal rate to half-maximum glucose disposal rate after cessation of insulin infusion • ED50, half maximally effective insulin dose • EGO, endogenous glucose output • FFA, free fatty acid • GDR, glucose disposal rate • hot-GINF, glucose infusion containing D-[3-3H]glucose • IGDR, incremental GDR • Ra, glucose appearance • Rd, glucose disappearance • Rd max, maximum rate of glucose disposal


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
J. Westerbacka, R. Bergholm, M. Tiikkainen, and H. Yki-Jarvinen
Glargine and Regular Human Insulin Similarly Acutely Enhance Endothelium-Dependent Vasodilatation in Normal Subjects
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., February 1, 2004; 24(2): 320 - 324.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Diabetes Diabetes Care Clinical Diabetes Diabetes Spectrum
Copyright © 2002 by the American Diabetes Association.