Diabetes Care
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ferrara, A.
Right arrow Articles by Selby, J. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ferrara, A.
Right arrow Articles by Selby, J. V.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Diabetes Care 25:1625-1630, 2002
© 2002 by the American Diabetes Association, Inc.


Pathophysiology/Complications
Original Article

Prevalence of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Detected by the National Diabetes Data Group or the Carpenter and Coustan Plasma Glucose Thresholds

Assiamira Ferrara, MD, PHD, Monique M. Hedderson, MPH, Charles P. Quesenberry, PHD and Joseph V. Selby, MD, MPH

From the Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, California

OBJECTIVE—In 2000, the American Diabetes Association proposed the adoption of the Carpenter and Coustan criteria for diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). The Carpenter and Coustan cutoffs are lower than the previously recommended National Diabetes Data Group (NDDG) values and would result in higher prevalence of GDM. Our aim is to estimate the magnitude of change in prevalence of GDM using the Carpenter and Coustan thresholds as compared with the NDDG thresholds by age and ethnicity.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—Cross-sectional study of 28,330 women aged 14–49 years who gave birth in 1996 and were members of the Northern California Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program. Age, ethnicity, screening, and diagnostic test results were assessed from computerized hospitalization and laboratory systems.

RESULTS—A total of 26,481 (94%) women were screened using a 50-g, 1-h oral glucose tolerance test, and 4,190 women underwent a diagnostic 100-g, 3-h oral glucose tolerance test after an abnormal screening. Overall, the GDM prevalence among screened women was 3.2% (95% CI 3.0–3.4) by NDDG and 4.8% (95% CI 4.5–5.1) by Carpenter and Coustan criteria, and based on either threshold, it increased with age (P < 0.001). The age-adjusted GDM prevalence by NDDG and Carpenter and Coustan criteria, respectively, was 5.0 and 7.4% in Asians, 3.9 and 5.6% in Hispanics, 3.0 and 4.0% in African-Americans, and 2.4 and 3.8% in whites. Proportional increments were larger in women aged <25 years (70%) and in whites (58%).

CONCLUSIONS—The prevalence of GDM increased, on average, by 50% with use of the Carpenter and Coustan thresholds. Relative increments were greater in low-risk age and ethnic groups. This information would be useful for clinical settings in predicting cost of GDM based on demographic characteristics of the population.

Abbreviations: ADA, American Diabetes Association • GDM, gestational diabetes mellitus • KPMCP, Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program • NCKP, Northern California Kaiser Permanente • NDDG, National Diabetes Data Group • OGTT, oral glucose tolerance test


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
A. Ferrara
Increasing Prevalence of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A public health perspective
Diabetes Care, July 1, 2007; 30(Supplement_2): S141 - S146.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Public HealthHome page
T. J. Rosenberg, S. Garbers, H. Lipkind, and M. A. Chiasson
Maternal Obesity and Diabetes as Risk Factors for Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: Differences Among 4 Racial/Ethnic Groups
Am J Public Health, September 1, 2005; 95(9): 1545 - 1551.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
S. G. Gabbe, R. P. Gregory, M. L. Power, S. B. Williams, and J. Schulkin
Management of Diabetes Mellitus by Obstetrician-Gynecologists
Obstet. Gynecol., June 1, 2004; 103(6): 1229 - 1234.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
M. M. Hedderson, A. Ferrara, and D. A. Sacks
Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Lesser Degrees of Pregnancy Hyperglycemia: Association With Increased Risk of Spontaneous Preterm Birth
Obstet. Gynecol., October 1, 2003; 102(4): 850 - 856.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
S. G. Gabbe and C. R. Graves
Management of Diabetes Mellitus Complicating Pregnancy
Obstet. Gynecol., October 1, 2003; 102(4): 857 - 868.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
N. W. Cheung and K. Byth
Population Health Significance of Gestational Diabetes
Diabetes Care, July 1, 2003; 26(7): 2005 - 2009.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
A. Ferrara, H. S. Kahn, C. P. Quesenberry, C. Riley, and M. M. Hedderson
An Increase in the Incidence of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Northern California, 1991-2000
Obstet. Gynecol., January 1, 1991; 103(3): 526 - 533.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Diabetes Diabetes Care Clinical Diabetes Diabetes Spectrum
Copyright © 2002 by the American Diabetes Association.