HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Goldhaber-Fiebert, J. D. Articles by Nathan, D. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Goldhaber-Fiebert, J. D. Articles by Nathan, D. M. Social Bookmarking                What's this?

Randomized Controlled Community-Based Nutrition and Exercise Intervention Improves Glycemia and Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Type 2 Diabetic Patients in Rural Costa Rica

¹ Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
² International Health Central American Institute, San José, Costa Rica
³ Diabetes Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

OBJECTIVE—The prevalence of type 2 diabetes, especially in developing countries, has grown over the past decades. We performed a controlled clinical study to determine whether a community-based, group-centered public health intervention addressing nutrition and exercise can ameliorate glycemic control and associated cardiovascular risk factors in type 2 diabetic patients in rural Costa Rica.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—A total of 75 adults with type 2 diabetes, mean age 59 years, were randomly assigned to the intervention group or the control group. All participants received basic diabetes education. The subjects in the intervention group participated in 11 weekly nutrition classes (90 min each session). Subjects for whom exercise was deemed safe also participated in triweekly walking groups (60 min each session). Glycosylated hemoglobin, fasting plasma glucose, total cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL and LDL cholesterol, height, weight, BMI, and blood pressure were measured at baseline and the end of the study (after 12 weeks).

RESULTS—The intervention group lost 1.0 ± 2.2 kg compared with a weight gain in the control group of 0.4 ± 2.3 kg (P = 0.028). Fasting plasma glucose decreased 19 ± 55 mg/dl in the intervention group and increased 16 ± 78 mg/dl in the control group (P = 0.048). Glycosylated hemoglobin decreased 1.8 ± 2.3% in the intervention group and 0.4 ± 2.3% in the control group (P = 0.028).

CONCLUSIONS—Glycemic control of type 2 diabetic patients can be improved through community-based, group-centered public health interventions addressing nutrition and exercise. This pilot study provides an economically feasible model for programs that aim to improve the health status of people with type 2 diabetes.

CiteULike    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A.J. van Rooijen, P. Rheeder, C.J. Eales, and P.J. Becker Effect of exercise versus relaxation on haemoglobin A1C in Black females with type 2 diabetes mellitus QJM, June 1, 2004; 97(6): 343 - 351. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Balducci, F. Leonetti, U. Di Mario, and F. Fallucca Is a Long-Term Aerobic Plus Resistance Training Program Feasible for and Effective on Metabolic Profiles in Type 2 Diabetic Patients? Diabetes Care, March 1, 2004; 27(3): 841 - 842. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. L. Sievenpiper and V. Vuksan Glycemic Index in the Treatment of Diabetes: The Debate Continues J. Am. Coll. Nutr., February 1, 2004; 23(1): 1 - 4. [Full Text] [PDF]

				OTHER ARTICLES NOTED (25 Apr 2003 to 18 Jul 2003) Evid. Based Nurs., October 1, 2003; 6(4): e1 - 12. [Full Text]

				M. J. Franz The Glycemic Index: Not the most effective nutrition therapy intervention Diabetes Care, August 1, 2003; 26(8): 2466 - 2468. [Full Text] [PDF]