Diabetes Care
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Parretti, E.
Right arrow Articles by Mello, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Parretti, E.
Right arrow Articles by Mello, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Diabetes Care 26:2741-2748, 2003
© 2003 by the American Diabetes Association, Inc.


Clinical Care/Education/Nutrition
Original Article

Sonographic Evaluation of Fetal Growth and Body Composition in Women With Different Degrees of Normal Glucose Metabolism

Elena Parretti, MD, Lucia Carignani, MD, Riccardo Cioni, MD, Elisa Bartoli, MD, Patrizia Borri, MD, Pasquale La Torre, MD, Federico Mecacci, MD, Elisabetta Martini, MD, Gianfranco Scarselli, MD and Giorgio Mello, MD

Department of Gynecology, Perinatology and Human Reproduction, University of Florence, Florence, Italy

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Professor Giorgio Mello, Via Masaccio, 92, 50100 Florence, Italy. E-mail: mellog{at}unifi.it

OBJECTIVE—To investigate the maternal demographic and metabolic factors contributing to the growth of fetal lean and fat body mass in women whose degree of glucose intolerance is less than that defining gestational diabetes in comparison with women with normal glucose metabolism.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—Longitudinal sonographic examinations of 66 singleton fetuses without anomalies of nonobese mothers with abnormal oral glucose challenge test (GCT) results and without gestational diabetes (group 1) were compared with those of 123 singleton fetuses without anomalies of nonobese mothers with normal GCT values (group 2). Lean body mass measurements included head circumference, femur length, mid-upper arm, and mid-thigh central areas. Fat body mass measurements included the anterior abdominal wall thickness, the subscapular thickness, and the mid-upper arm and mid-thigh subcutaneous areas. All the women performed a 24-h glucose profile on the day preceding the ultrasound scan. Multivariate logistic regression analysis established best-fit equations for fetal sonographic measurements of fat and lean body mass. Independent variables included groups 1 and 2, maternal age, parity, prepregnancy BMI, gestational age, weight gain during pregnancy, fetal sex, and the following averaged 24-h profile maternal capillary blood glucose values: preprandial, 1-h postprandial, and 2-h postprandial.

RESULTS—No difference was found between the two groups with respect to fetal lean body mass parameters; the factors that contributed significantly and most frequently were gestational age and fetal sex (male). With respect to fetal fat body mass, all the measurements were significantly higher in group 1 than in group 2. In all instances, the significantly contributing factors were gestational age and maternal 1-h postprandial glucose values, whereas another frequent contributor was prepregnancy BMI.

CONCLUSIONS—Our study suggests the possibility of using sonographically determined fetal fat and lean mass measurements as indicators of body composition. The assessment of these parameters, achievable in a noninvasive and reproducible fashion in pregnancies complicated by glucose intolerance, might enable the real-time detection of fetal overgrowth and disproportion, thus opening the possibility of exploring interventions to limit fetal fat accretion, birth weight, and potential resulting morbidity.

Abbreviations: GCT, glucose challenge test • GTT, glucose tolerance test


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
M. Hod and Y. Yogev
Goals of Metabolic Management of Gestational Diabetes: Is it all about the sugar?
Diabetes Care, July 1, 2007; 30(Supplement_2): S180 - S187.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes Spectr.Home page
J. D.L. Dupak and A. L. Trujillo
Ultrasound Surveillance in Pregnancy Complicated by Diabetes
Diabetes Spectr, April 1, 2007; 20(2): 89 - 93.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Diabetes Diabetes Care Clinical Diabetes Diabetes Spectrum
Copyright © 2003 by the American Diabetes Association.