HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Neubauer, A. S. Articles by Kampik, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Neubauer, A. S. Articles by Kampik, A. Social Bookmarking                What's this?

Tele-Screening for Diabetic Retinopathy With the Retinal Thickness Analyzer

From the Department of Ophthalmology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Aljoscha S. Neubauer, MD, Department of Ophthalmology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Mathildenstr. 8, 80336 Munich, Germany. E-mail: aneubaue{at}ak-i.med.uni-muenchen.de

OBJECTIVE—To compare the effectiveness of tele-screening using a novel enhanced retinal thickness analyzer (RTA) with onsite routine ophthalmologic examination for diabetic retinopathy.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—A consecutive series of 31 eyes from diabetic patients were included. All underwent ophthalmologic examination, including stereoscopic dilated funduscopy and scanning with the RTA. The RTA reports consisted of a wide-angle, red-free fundus photograph and a macular-region retinal thickness map. Reports were graded by three independent graders in a masked manner. The diagnoses of proliferative retinopathy, macular edema, and treatment decisions made by the RTA graders and the clinical examiner were compared.

RESULTS—On clinical examination 5 of 31 eyes were diagnosed with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). All five were referred for treatment by two graders and four eyes by one grader. All eyes with PDR and 12 of the 26 eyes with nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy showed severe macular edema. Seven of the 12 eyes with macular edema were clinically eligible for focal laser treatment, and all of them were detected by all RTA graders. Macular thickening was detected in eight eyes by RTA where no treatment was necessary, as judged by clinical examination. Thus, sensitivity was 93% (mean) for detecting PDR and 100% for detecting macular edema, with a specificity of 58–96% depending on the grader. The RTA did not allow valid assessment due to poor image quality in only one case.

CONCLUSIONS—Screening for diabetic retinopathy with a combination of wide-angle fundus photography and macular thickness mapping by an objective method, such as optical coherence tomography or the RTA, offers the prerequisites for establishing a successful tele-screening program.

Abbreviations: DRS, Diabetic Retinopathy Study • ETDRS, Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study • NPDR, nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy • PDR, proliferative diabetic retinopathy • PPV, pars plana vitrectomy • RTA, retinal thickness analyzer

CiteULike    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K A Goatman A reference standard for the measurement of macular oedema. Br. J. Ophthalmol., September 1, 2006; 90(9): 1197 - 1202. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]