Diabetes Care
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Homko, C.
Right arrow Articles by Boden, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Homko, C.
Right arrow Articles by Boden, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Diabetes Care 26:2027-2031, 2003
© 2003 by the American Diabetes Association, Inc.


Epidemiology/Health Services/Psychosocial Research
Original Article

Comparison of Insulin Aspart and Lispro

Pharmacokinetic and metabolic effects

Carol Homko, RN, PHD, Antonio Deluzio, DO, Carolyn Jimenez, PHD, Jerzy W. Kolaczynski, MD, PHD and Guenther Boden, MD

From the General Clinical Research Center and Division of Endocrinology/Diabetes/Metabolism, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Guenther Boden, Temple University Hospital, 3401 N. Broad St., Philadelphia, PA 19140. E-mail: bodengh{at}tuhs.temple.edu.

OBJECTIVE—To compare insulin levels and actions in patients with type 1 diabetes after subcutaneous injection of the rapid-acting insulin analogs aspart and lispro.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—Seven C-peptide–negative patients with type 1 diabetes (two men and five women) were studied at the General Clinical Research Center at Temple University Hospital two times, 1 month apart. Their plasma glucose was normalized overnight by intravenous infusion of insulin. The next morning, they received subcutaneous injections of either aspart or lispro (9.4 ± 1.9 U) in random order. For the next 4–5 h, their plasma glucose was clamped at ~5.5 mmol/l with a variable infusion of 20% glucose. The study was terminated after 8 h.

RESULTS—Both insulin analogs produced similar serum insulin levels (250–300 pmol/l) at ~30 min and disappeared from serum after ~4 h. Insulin aspart and lispro had similar effects on glucose and fat metabolism. Effects on carbohydrate metabolism (glucose uptake, glucose oxidation, and endogenous glucose production) peaked after ~2–3 h and disappeared after ~5–6 h. Effects on lipid metabolism (plasma free fatty acid, ketone body levels, and free fatty acid oxidation) appeared to peak earlier (at ~2 h) and disappeared earlier (after ~4 h) than the effects on carbohydrate metabolism.

CONCLUSIONS—We conclude that both insulin aspart and lispro are indistinguishable from each other with respect to blood levels and that they are equally effective in correcting abnormalities in carbohydrate and fat metabolism in patients with type 1 diabetes.

Abbreviations: EGP, endogenous glucose production • FFA, free fatty acid • GIR, glucose infusion rate • GRa, rate of glucose appearance • GRd, rate of glucose disappearance


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
H. A. Wolpert
The Nuts and Bolts of Achieving End Points With Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring
Diabetes Care, February 1, 2008; 31(Supplement_2): S146 - S149.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes Spectr.Home page
A. L. Trujillo
Insulin Analogs and Pregnancy
Diabetes Spectr, April 1, 2007; 20(2): 94 - 101.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EDUCATION AND PRACTICEHome page
F. M Regan and D. B Dunger
Use of new insulins in children
Arch. Dis. Child. Ed. Pract., August 1, 2006; 91(2): ep47 - ep53.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
T. P. Ciaraldi, S. A. Phillips, L. Carter, V. Aroda, S. Mudaliar, and R. R. Henry
Effects of the Rapid-Acting Insulin Analog Glulisine on Cultured Human Skeletal Muscle Cells: Comparisons with Insulin and Insulin-Like Growth Factor I
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2005; 90(10): 5551 - 5558.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
J. Plank, A. Siebenhofer, A. Berghold, K. Jeitler, K. Horvath, P. Mrak, and T. R. Pieber
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Short-Acting Insulin Analogues in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus
Arch Intern Med, June 27, 2005; 165(12): 1337 - 1344.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
R. Alemzadeh, J. N. Ellis, M. K. Holzum, E. A. Parton, and D. T. Wyatt
Beneficial Effects of Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion and Flexible Multiple Daily Insulin Regimen Using Insulin Glargine in Type 1 Diabetes
Pediatrics, July 1, 2004; 114(1): e91 - e95.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Diabetes Diabetes Care Clinical Diabetes Diabetes Spectrum
Copyright © 2003 by the American Diabetes Association.