Diabetes Care 27:1417-1426, 2004
© 2004 by the American Diabetes Association, Inc.
Metabolic Syndrome/Insulin Resistance Syndrome/Pre-Diabetes Original Article |
Using Metabolic Syndrome Traits for Efficient Detection of Impaired Glucose Tolerance
James B. Meigs, MD MPH1,2,
Ken Williams, MS3,
Lisa M. Sullivan, PHD4,
Kelly J. Hunt, PHD3,
Steven M. Haffner, MD3,
Michael P. Stern, MD3,
Clicerio González Villalpando, MD5,
Jessica S. Perhanidis, MPH1,
David M. Nathan, MD2,
Ralph B. DAgostino, Jr, PHD6,
Ralph B. DAgostino, Sr, PHD4 and
Peter W.F. Wilson, MD7
1 General Medicine Division, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
2 Diabetes Center, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
3 Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas
4 Statistics and Consulting Unit of the Mathematics and Statistics Department at Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts
5 Centro de Estudios en Diabetes, The American British Coudray Hospital and Unidades de Investigación in Médica en Enfermedades Metabolicas y Epidemiología Clínica, Hospital Gabriel Mancera, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Mexico City, México
6 Department of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
7 Boston University School of Medicine and Framingham Heart Study, Framingham, Massachusetts
Address correspondence and reprint requests to James B. Meigs, MD, MPH, General Internal Medicine Unit Massachusetts General Hospital, 50 Staniford St., 9th Floor, Boston, MA 02114. E-mail: jmeigs{at}partners.org
OBJECTIVEEfficient detection of impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) is needed to implement type 2 diabetes prevention interventions.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODSWe assessed the capacity of the metabolic syndrome (MetS) to identify IGT in a cross-sectional analysis of 3,326 Caucasian Framingham Offspring Study (FOS), 1,168 Caucasian and 1,812 Mexican-American San Antonio Heart Study (SAHS), 1,983 Mexico City Diabetes Study (MCDS), and 452 Caucasian, 407 Mexican-American, and 290 African-American Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study (IRAS) men and women aged 3079 years who had a clinical examination and an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) during 19871996. Those with diabetes treatment or fasting plasma glucose 7.0 mmol/l were excluded (MetS was defined by Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Programs Adult Treatment Panel criteria and IGT as 2-h postchallenge glucose [2hPG] 7.8 mmol/l). We calculated positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV), population attributable risk percentages (PAR%), age- and sex-adjusted odds ratios (ORs), and areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AROCs) associated with MetS traits.
RESULTSAmong FOS, SAHS, and MCDS subjects, 2443% had MetS and 1523% had IGT (including 25% with 2hPG 11.1 mmol/l). Among those with MetS, OR for IGT were 34, PPV were 0.240.41, NPV were 0.840.91, and PAR% were 3040%. Among subjects with MetS defined by impaired fasting glucose (IFG) and any two other traits, OR for IGT were 924, PPV were 0.620.89, NPV were 0.780.87, and PAR% were 312%. Among IRAS subjects, 2434% had MetS and 3741% had IGT. Among those with MetS, ORs for IGT were 36, PPVs were 0.570.73, and NPVs were 0.670.72. In logistic regression models, IFG, large waist, and high triglycerides were independently associated with IGT (AROC 0.710.83) in all study populations.
CONCLUSIONSThe MetS, especially defined by IFG, large waist, and high triglycerides, efficiently identifies subjects likely to have IGT on OGTT and thus be eligible for diabetes prevention interventions.
Abbreviations: AR%, attributable risk percentage AROC, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve FOS, Framingham Offspring Study FPG, fasting plasma glucose IFG, impaired fasting glucose IGT, impaired glucose tolerance IRAS, Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study MCDS, Mexico City Diabetes Study MetS, metabolic syndrome NCEP ATP III, Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Programs Adult Treatment Panel III NPV, negative predictive value PAR%, population AR% PPV, positive predictive value OGTT, oral glucose tolerance test SAHS, San Antonio Heart Study 2hPG, 2-h postchallenge glucose

CiteULike Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. C. Seidel, R. O. Powell, J. C. Zgibor, L. M. Siminerio, and G. A. Piatt
Translating the Diabetes Prevention Program Into an Urban Medically Underserved Community: A nonrandomized prospective intervention study
Diabetes Care,
April 1, 2008;
31(4):
684 - 689.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. C. Rosal, E. M. Benjamin, P. S. Pekow, S. C. Lemon, and D. von Goeler
Opportunities and Challenges for Diabetes Prevention at Two Community Health Centers
Diabetes Care,
February 1, 2008;
31(2):
247 - 254.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Ferrannini
Metabolic Syndrome: A Solution in Search of a Problem
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.,
February 1, 2007;
92(2):
396 - 398.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. A. Aguilar-Salinas, R. Rojas, C. Gonzalez-Villalpando, F. J. Gomez-Perez, R. Mehta, G. Olaiz, J. A. Rull, and D. R. Cox
Design and validation of a population-based definition of the metabolic syndrome.
Diabetes Care,
November 1, 2006;
29(11):
2420 - 2426.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. B. Meigs, P. W. F. Wilson, C. S. Fox, R. S. Vasan, D. M. Nathan, L. M. Sullivan, and R. B. D'Agostino
Body Mass Index, Metabolic Syndrome, and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes or Cardiovascular Disease
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.,
August 1, 2006;
91(8):
2906 - 2912.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2004 by the American Diabetes Association.
|
|
| |
|