Diabetes Care
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Meigs, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, P. W.F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Meigs, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, P. W.F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Diabetes Care 27:1417-1426, 2004
© 2004 by the American Diabetes Association, Inc.


Metabolic Syndrome/Insulin Resistance Syndrome/Pre-Diabetes
Original Article

Using Metabolic Syndrome Traits for Efficient Detection of Impaired Glucose Tolerance

James B. Meigs, MD MPH1,2, Ken Williams, MS3, Lisa M. Sullivan, PHD4, Kelly J. Hunt, PHD3, Steven M. Haffner, MD3, Michael P. Stern, MD3, Clicerio González Villalpando, MD5, Jessica S. Perhanidis, MPH1, David M. Nathan, MD2, Ralph B. D’Agostino, Jr, PHD6, Ralph B. D’Agostino, Sr, PHD4 and Peter W.F. Wilson, MD7

1 General Medicine Division, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
2 Diabetes Center, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
3 Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas
4 Statistics and Consulting Unit of the Mathematics and Statistics Department at Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts
5 Centro de Estudios en Diabetes, The American British Coudray Hospital and Unidades de Investigación in Médica en Enfermedades Metabolicas y Epidemiología Clínica, Hospital Gabriel Mancera, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Mexico City, México
6 Department of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
7 Boston University School of Medicine and Framingham Heart Study, Framingham, Massachusetts

Address correspondence and reprint requests to James B. Meigs, MD, MPH, General Internal Medicine Unit Massachusetts General Hospital, 50 Staniford St., 9th Floor, Boston, MA 02114. E-mail: jmeigs{at}partners.org

OBJECTIVE—Efficient detection of impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) is needed to implement type 2 diabetes prevention interventions.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—We assessed the capacity of the metabolic syndrome (MetS) to identify IGT in a cross-sectional analysis of 3,326 Caucasian Framingham Offspring Study (FOS), 1,168 Caucasian and 1,812 Mexican-American San Antonio Heart Study (SAHS), 1,983 Mexico City Diabetes Study (MCDS), and 452 Caucasian, 407 Mexican-American, and 290 African-American Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study (IRAS) men and women aged 30–79 years who had a clinical examination and an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) during 1987–1996. Those with diabetes treatment or fasting plasma glucose >=7.0 mmol/l were excluded (MetS was defined by Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program’s Adult Treatment Panel criteria and IGT as 2-h postchallenge glucose [2hPG] >=7.8 mmol/l). We calculated positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV), population attributable risk percentages (PAR%), age- and sex-adjusted odds ratios (ORs), and areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AROCs) associated with MetS traits.

RESULTS—Among FOS, SAHS, and MCDS subjects, 24–43% had MetS and 15–23% had IGT (including 2–5% with 2hPG >=11.1 mmol/l). Among those with MetS, OR for IGT were 3–4, PPV were 0.24–0.41, NPV were 0.84–0.91, and PAR% were 30–40%. Among subjects with MetS defined by impaired fasting glucose (IFG) and any two other traits, OR for IGT were 9–24, PPV were 0.62–0.89, NPV were 0.78–0.87, and PAR% were 3–12%. Among IRAS subjects, 24–34% had MetS and 37–41% had IGT. Among those with MetS, ORs for IGT were 3–6, PPVs were 0.57–0.73, and NPVs were 0.67–0.72. In logistic regression models, IFG, large waist, and high triglycerides were independently associated with IGT (AROC 0.71–0.83) in all study populations.

CONCLUSIONS—The MetS, especially defined by IFG, large waist, and high triglycerides, efficiently identifies subjects likely to have IGT on OGTT and thus be eligible for diabetes prevention interventions.

Abbreviations: AR%, attributable risk percentage • AROC, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve • FOS, Framingham Offspring Study • FPG, fasting plasma glucose • IFG, impaired fasting glucose • IGT, impaired glucose tolerance • IRAS, Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study • MCDS, Mexico City Diabetes Study • MetS, metabolic syndrome • NCEP ATP III, Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program’s Adult Treatment Panel III • NPV, negative predictive value • PAR%, population AR% • PPV, positive predictive value • OGTT, oral glucose tolerance test • SAHS, San Antonio Heart Study • 2hPG, 2-h postchallenge glucose


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
M. C. Seidel, R. O. Powell, J. C. Zgibor, L. M. Siminerio, and G. A. Piatt
Translating the Diabetes Prevention Program Into an Urban Medically Underserved Community: A nonrandomized prospective intervention study
Diabetes Care, April 1, 2008; 31(4): 684 - 689.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
M. C. Rosal, E. M. Benjamin, P. S. Pekow, S. C. Lemon, and D. von Goeler
Opportunities and Challenges for Diabetes Prevention at Two Community Health Centers
Diabetes Care, February 1, 2008; 31(2): 247 - 254.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
E. Ferrannini
Metabolic Syndrome: A Solution in Search of a Problem
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2007; 92(2): 396 - 398.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
C. A. Aguilar-Salinas, R. Rojas, C. Gonzalez-Villalpando, F. J. Gomez-Perez, R. Mehta, G. Olaiz, J. A. Rull, and D. R. Cox
Design and validation of a population-based definition of the metabolic syndrome.
Diabetes Care, November 1, 2006; 29(11): 2420 - 2426.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
J. B. Meigs, P. W. F. Wilson, C. S. Fox, R. S. Vasan, D. M. Nathan, L. M. Sullivan, and R. B. D'Agostino
Body Mass Index, Metabolic Syndrome, and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes or Cardiovascular Disease
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 2006; 91(8): 2906 - 2912.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Diabetes Diabetes Care Clinical Diabetes Diabetes Spectrum
Copyright © 2004 by the American Diabetes Association.