© 2004 by the American Diabetes Association, Inc.
Impaired Insulin Sensitivity, Insulin Secretion, and Glucose Effectiveness Predict Future Development of Impaired Glucose Tolerance and Type 2 Diabetes in Pre-Diabetic African AmericansImplications for primary diabetes preventionFrom the Ohio State University College of Medicine and Public Health, Columbus, Ohio Address correspondence and reprint requests to Kwame Osei, MD, FACE, FACP, Ohio State University College of Medicine and Public Health, 491 McCampbell Hall, Columbus, OH 43210. E-mail: osei-1{at}medtr.osu.edu OBJECTIVEWe examined the determinants of impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and type 2 diabetes in first-degree relatives of African-American type 2 diabetic patients over 58 years (median 6). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODSA total of 81 healthy subjects (age 41.5 ± 4.8 years; BMI 31.3 ± 3.6 kg/m2) participated in the study. Each subject underwent an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and a frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test at baseline. Insulin sensitivity index (Si) and glucose effectiveness index (Sg) were determined by the minimal model method. Homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) was used to estimate insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and ß-cell function (HOMA-%B). A total of 18 subjects progressed to either IGT or type 2 diabetes (progressors), whereas 19 subjects maintained normal glucose tolerance (nonprogressors). RESULTSComparing the progressors and nonprogressors, mean fasting serum glucose levels (95 ± 8 vs. 80 ± 14 mg/dl, P < 0.01) and 2-h serum glucose levels (149 ± 27 vs. 100 ± 60 mg/dl, P < 0.01) as well as 2-h serum insulin levels (117 ± 81 vs. 72 ± 87 µU/ml, P < 0.01) during OGTT were higher at baseline. Mean acute first-phase insulin secretion (205 ± 217 vs. 305 ± 230 µU/ml), HOMA-%B (148 ± 60 vs. 346 ± 372, P < 01), Si (1.61 ± 1.13 vs. 2.48 ± 1.25 x 104 · min1 [µU/ml]1), and Sg (1.48 ± 0.61 vs. 2.30 ± 0.97 x 102 · min1) were lower in the progressors than in the nonprogressors at baseline. Mean HOMA-IR (3.31 ± 1.64 vs. 2.36 ± 1.64) was significantly greater in the progressors than the nonprogressors. At the time of diagnosis of glucose intolerance (IGT + diabetes), HOMA-%B (101 ± 48 vs. 148 ± 60, P < 0.001) and HOMA-IR (5.44 ± 2.55 vs. 3.31 ± 1.64, P < 0.003) deteriorated in the progressors versus baseline. CONCLUSIONSWe conclude that nondiabetic, first-degree relatives of African-American type 2 diabetic patients who progressed to IGT and type 2 diabetes manifest triple defects (decreased insulin secretion, insulin action, and glucose effectiveness) that antecede the disease.
Abbreviations: HIE, hepatic insulin extraction HOMA, homeostasis model assessment HOMA-%B, HOMA-derived ß-cell function HOMA-IR, HOMA-derived insulin resistance index IGT, impaired glucose tolerance OGTT, oral glucose tolerance test
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||