Diabetes Care 27:1529-1534, 2004
© 2004 by the American Diabetes Association, Inc.
Clinical Care/Education/Nutrition Original Article |
Managed Care Organization and the Quality of Diabetes Care
The Translating Research Into Action for Diabetes (TRIAD) study
Catherine Kim, MD, MPH1,2,
David F. Williamson, PHD3,
Carol M. Mangione, MD, MSPH4,
Monika M. Safford, MD5,
Joseph V. Selby, MD, MPH6,
David G. Marrero, PHD7,
J. David Curb, MD, MPH8,
Theodore J. Thompson, MS3,
K.M. Venkat Narayan, MD, MSC, MBA3 and
William H. Herman, MD, MPH9,10 the TRIAD Study Group*
1 Department of Internal Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
2 Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
3 Division of Diabetes Translation, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
4 Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California
5 Department of Internal Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Newark, New Jersey
6 Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, California
7 Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
8 Pacific Health Research Institute, Honolulu, Hawaii
9 Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
10 Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Catherine Kim, MD, MPH, 300 North Ingalls Building, Room 7C13, Ann Arbor, MI 48109. E-mail: cathkim{at}umich.edu
OBJECTIVETo examine the association between the organizational model and diabetes processes of care.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODSWe used data from the Translating Research into Action for Diabetes (TRIAD), a multicenter study of diabetes care in managed care, including 8,354 patients with diabetes. We identified five model types: for-profit group/network, for-profit independent practice association (IPA), nonprofit group/network, nonprofit IPA, and nonprofit group/staff. Process measures included retinal, renal, foot, lipid, and HbA1c testing; aspirin recommendations; influenza vaccination; and a sum of these seven processes of care over 1 year. Hierarchical regression models were constructed for each process measure and accounted for clustering at the health plan and provider group levels and adjusted for participant age, sex, race, ethnicity, diabetes treatment and duration, education, income, health status, and survey language.
RESULTSParticipant membership in the model types ranged from 9% in nonprofit IPA models to 38% in nonprofit group/staff models. Over 75% of participants received most of the processes of care, regardless of model type. However, among for-profit plans, group/network models provided on average more processes of care than IPA models (5.5 vs. 4.7, P < 0.0001), and group/network models generally increased the probability of receiving a process by 10 percentage points. Among nonprofit plans, no effect of model type was found.
CONCLUSIONSAmong for-profit plans, group/network models provided better diabetes processes of care than IPA models. Although reasons are speculative, this may be due to the clinical infrastructure available in group models that is not available in IPA models.
Abbreviations: IPA, independent practice association TRIAD, Translating Research into Action for Diabetes

CiteULike Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Ferrara, C. M. Mangione, C. Kim, D. G. Marrero, D. Curb, M. Stevens, J. V. Selby, and for the Translating Research Into Action for Diabe
Sex Disparities in Control and Treatment of Modifiable Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors Among Patients With Diabetes: Translating Research Into Action for Diabetes (TRIAD) Study
Diabetes Care,
January 1, 2008;
31(1):
69 - 74.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. H. Herman
Diabetes Epidemiology: Guiding Clinical and Public Health Practice: The Kelly West Award Lecture, 2006
Diabetes Care,
July 1, 2007;
30(7):
1912 - 1919.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. M. McBean and X. Yu
The Underuse of Screening Services Among Elderly Women With Diabetes
Diabetes Care,
June 1, 2007;
30(6):
1466 - 1472.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Kim, B. P. Tabaei, R. Burke, L. N. McEwen, R. W. Lash, S. L. Johnson, K. L. Schwartz, S. J. Bernstein, and W. H. Herman
Missed Opportunities for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Screening Among Women With a History of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus
Am J Public Health,
September 1, 2006;
96(9):
1643 - 1648.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Hollander, D. Nicewander, C. Couch, D. Winter, J. Herrin, Z. Haydar, and D. J. Ballard
Quality of Care of Medicare Patients With Diabetes in a Metropolitan Fee-for-Service Primary Care Integrated Delivery System
American Journal of Medical Quality,
November 1, 2005;
20(6):
344 - 352.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Kim, L. N. McEwen, R. B. Gerzoff, D. G. Marrero, C. M. Mangione, J. V. Selby, and W. H. Herman
Is Physician Gender Associated With the Quality of Diabetes Care?
Diabetes Care,
July 1, 2005;
28(7):
1594 - 1598.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2004 by the American Diabetes Association.
|
|
| |
|