Diabetes Care
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Online appendixes
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, C.
Right arrow Articles by Herman, W. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kim, C.
Right arrow Articles by Herman, W. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Diabetes Care 27:1529-1534, 2004
© 2004 by the American Diabetes Association, Inc.


Clinical Care/Education/Nutrition
Original Article

Managed Care Organization and the Quality of Diabetes Care

The Translating Research Into Action for Diabetes (TRIAD) study

Catherine Kim, MD, MPH1,2, David F. Williamson, PHD3, Carol M. Mangione, MD, MSPH4, Monika M. Safford, MD5, Joseph V. Selby, MD, MPH6, David G. Marrero, PHD7, J. David Curb, MD, MPH8, Theodore J. Thompson, MS3, K.M. Venkat Narayan, MD, MSC, MBA3 and William H. Herman, MD, MPH9,10 the TRIAD Study Group*

1 Department of Internal Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
2 Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
3 Division of Diabetes Translation, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
4 Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California
5 Department of Internal Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Newark, New Jersey
6 Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, California
7 Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
8 Pacific Health Research Institute, Honolulu, Hawaii
9 Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
10 Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Catherine Kim, MD, MPH, 300 North Ingalls Building, Room 7C13, Ann Arbor, MI 48109. E-mail: cathkim{at}umich.edu

OBJECTIVE—To examine the association between the organizational model and diabetes processes of care.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—We used data from the Translating Research into Action for Diabetes (TRIAD), a multicenter study of diabetes care in managed care, including 8,354 patients with diabetes. We identified five model types: for-profit group/network, for-profit independent practice association (IPA), nonprofit group/network, nonprofit IPA, and nonprofit group/staff. Process measures included retinal, renal, foot, lipid, and HbA1c testing; aspirin recommendations; influenza vaccination; and a sum of these seven processes of care over 1 year. Hierarchical regression models were constructed for each process measure and accounted for clustering at the health plan and provider group levels and adjusted for participant age, sex, race, ethnicity, diabetes treatment and duration, education, income, health status, and survey language.

RESULTS—Participant membership in the model types ranged from 9% in nonprofit IPA models to 38% in nonprofit group/staff models. Over 75% of participants received most of the processes of care, regardless of model type. However, among for-profit plans, group/network models provided on average more processes of care than IPA models (5.5 vs. 4.7, P < 0.0001), and group/network models generally increased the probability of receiving a process by ≥10 percentage points. Among nonprofit plans, no effect of model type was found.

CONCLUSIONS—Among for-profit plans, group/network models provided better diabetes processes of care than IPA models. Although reasons are speculative, this may be due to the clinical infrastructure available in group models that is not available in IPA models.

Abbreviations: IPA, independent practice association • TRIAD, Translating Research into Action for Diabetes


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
A. Ferrara, C. M. Mangione, C. Kim, D. G. Marrero, D. Curb, M. Stevens, J. V. Selby, and for the Translating Research Into Action for Diabe
Sex Disparities in Control and Treatment of Modifiable Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors Among Patients With Diabetes: Translating Research Into Action for Diabetes (TRIAD) Study
Diabetes Care, January 1, 2008; 31(1): 69 - 74.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
W. H. Herman
Diabetes Epidemiology: Guiding Clinical and Public Health Practice: The Kelly West Award Lecture, 2006
Diabetes Care, July 1, 2007; 30(7): 1912 - 1919.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
A. M. McBean and X. Yu
The Underuse of Screening Services Among Elderly Women With Diabetes
Diabetes Care, June 1, 2007; 30(6): 1466 - 1472.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Public HealthHome page
C. Kim, B. P. Tabaei, R. Burke, L. N. McEwen, R. W. Lash, S. L. Johnson, K. L. Schwartz, S. J. Bernstein, and W. H. Herman
Missed Opportunities for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Screening Among Women With a History of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus
Am J Public Health, September 1, 2006; 96(9): 1643 - 1648.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
American Journal of Medical QualityHome page
P. Hollander, D. Nicewander, C. Couch, D. Winter, J. Herrin, Z. Haydar, and D. J. Ballard
Quality of Care of Medicare Patients With Diabetes in a Metropolitan Fee-for-Service Primary Care Integrated Delivery System
American Journal of Medical Quality, November 1, 2005; 20(6): 344 - 352.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
C. Kim, L. N. McEwen, R. B. Gerzoff, D. G. Marrero, C. M. Mangione, J. V. Selby, and W. H. Herman
Is Physician Gender Associated With the Quality of Diabetes Care?
Diabetes Care, July 1, 2005; 28(7): 1594 - 1598.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Diabetes Diabetes Care Clinical Diabetes Diabetes Spectrum
Copyright © 2004 by the American Diabetes Association.