Diabetes Care 27:1922-1928, 2004
© 2004 by the American Diabetes Association, Inc.
Emerging Treatments and Technologies Original Article |
Evaluating the Accuracy of Continuous Glucose-Monitoring Sensors
Continuous glucoseerror grid analysis illustrated by TheraSense Freestyle Navigator data
Boris P. Kovatchev, PHD1,
Linda A. Gonder-Frederick, PHD1,
Daniel J. Cox, PHD1 and
William L. Clarke, MD2
1 Department of Psychiatric Medicine, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
2 Department of Pediatrics, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Boris Kovatchev, PhD, University of Virginia Health System, Box 800137, Charlottesville, VA 22908. E-mail: boris{at}virginia.edu
OBJECTIVEThe objective of this study was to introduce continuous glucoseerror grid analysis (CG-EGA) as a method of evaluating the accuracy of continuous glucose-monitoring sensors in terms of both accurate blood glucose (BG) values and accurate direction and rate of BG fluctuations and to illustrate the application of CG-EGA with data from the TheraSense Freestyle Navigator.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODSWe approach the design of CG-EGA from the understanding that continuous glucose sensors (CGSs) allow the observation of BG fluctuations as a process in time. We account for specifics of process characterization (location, speed, and direction) and for biological limitations of the observed processes (time lags associated with interstitial sensors). CG-EGA includes two interacting components: 1) pointerror grid analysis (P-EGA) evaluates the sensors accuracy in terms of correct presentation of BG values and 2) rateerror grid analysis (R-EGA) assesses the sensors ability to capture the direction and rate of BG fluctuations.
RESULTSCG-EGA revealed that the accuracy of the Navigator, measured as a percentage of accurate readings plus benign errors, was significantly different at hypoglycemia (73.5%), euglycemia (99%), and hyperglycemia (95.4%). Failure to detect hypoglycemia was the most common error. The point accuracy of the Navigator was relatively stable over a wide range of BG rates of change, and its rate accuracy decreased significantly at high BG levels.
CONCLUSIONSTraditional self-monitoring of BG device evaluation methods fail to capture the important temporal characteristics of the continuous glucose-monitoring process. CG-EGA addresses this problem, thus providing a comprehensive assessment of sensor accuracy that appears to be a useful adjunct to other CGS performance measures.
Abbreviations: BG, blood glucose CG-EGA, continuous glucoseerror grid analysis CGS, continuous glucose sensor EGA, error grid analysis P-EGA, pointerror grid analysis RBG, reference blood glucose R-EGA, rateerror grid analysis SBG, sensor blood glucose SMBG, self-monitoring of blood glucose

CiteULike Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Kovatchev, S. Anderson, L. Heinemann, and W. Clarke
Comparison of the Numerical and Clinical Accuracy of Four Continuous Glucose Monitors
Diabetes Care,
June 1, 2008;
31(6):
1160 - 1164.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. J. Worsley, G. A. Tourniaire, K. E. S. Medlock, F. K. Sartain, H. E. Harmer, M. Thatcher, A. M. Horgan, and J. Pritchard
Continuous Blood Glucose Monitoring with a Thin-Film Optical Sensor
Clin. Chem.,
October 1, 2007;
53(10):
1820 - 1826.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. J. Schrot, K. T. Patel, and P. Foulis
Evaluation of Inaccuracies in the Measurement of Glycemia in the Laboratory, by Glucose Meters, and Through Measurement of Hemoglobin A1c
Clin. Diabetes,
April 1, 2007;
25(2):
43 - 49.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. L. Clarke, L. Gonder-Frederick, D. Cox, and B. Kovatchev
A Critical Appraisal of the Continuous Glucose-Error Grid Analysis: Response to Wentholt et al.
Diabetes Care,
February 1, 2007;
30(2):
449 - 450.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. De Block, B. Manuel-y-Keenoy, L. Van Gaal, and P. Rogiers
Intensive Insulin Therapy in the Intensive Care Unit: Assessment by continuous glucose monitoring
Diabetes Care,
August 1, 2006;
29(8):
1750 - 1756.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. M. Wentholt, J. B. Hoekstra, and J. H. DeVries
A Critical Appraisal of the Continuous Glucose-Error Grid Analysis
Diabetes Care,
August 1, 2006;
29(8):
1805 - 1811.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. E. Panteleon, M. Loutseiko, G. M. Steil, and K. Rebrin
Evaluation of the effect of gain on the meal response of an automated closed-loop insulin delivery system.
Diabetes,
July 1, 2006;
55(7):
1995 - 2000.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. M. Wentholt, M. A. Vollebregt, A. A. Hart, J. B. Hoekstra, and J. H. DeVries
Comparison of a Needle-Type and a Microdialysis Continuous Glucose Monitor in Type 1 Diabetic Patients
Diabetes Care,
December 1, 2005;
28(12):
2871 - 2876.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. L. Clarke, S. Anderson, L. Farhy, M. Breton, L. Gonder-Frederick, D. Cox, and B. Kovatchev
Evaluating the Clinical Accuracy of Two Continuous Glucose Sensors Using Continuous Glucose-Error Grid Analysis
Diabetes Care,
October 1, 2005;
28(10):
2412 - 2417.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Valentine
Continuous Glucose Monitoring Has Left the Station: Are You Onboard?
The Diabetes Educator,
September 1, 2005;
31(5):
649 - 662.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. C. Klonoff
Continuous Glucose Monitoring: Roadmap for 21st century diabetes therapy
Diabetes Care,
May 1, 2005;
28(5):
1231 - 1239.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2004 by the American Diabetes Association.
|
|
| |
|