Diabetes Care 28:2361-2366, 2005
© 2005 by the American Diabetes Association, Inc.
Clinical Care/Education/Nutrition Original Article |
Glycemic Characteristics in Continuously Monitored Patients With Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes
Normative values
Bruce W. Bode, MD1,
Sherwyn Schwartz, MD2,
Harrison A. Stubbs, PHD3 and
Jon E. Block, PHD4
1 Atlanta Diabetes Associates, Atlanta, Georgia
2 Diabetes and Glandular Disease Research Associates, San Antonio, Texas
3 Oakland, California
4 San Francisco, California
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Jon E. Block, PhD, 2210 Jackson St., Suite 401, San Francisco, CA 94115. E-mail: jonblock{at}sbcglobal.net
OBJECTIVEThe purpose of this study was to generate normative values for periods of euglycemia as well as for daily patterns of glycemic excursions in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes monitored continuously for a maximum period of 21 days and blinded to glucose levels.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODSThis was a multicenter, prospective observational study in which 101 consecutive patients with type 1 (n = 60) or type 2 (n = 41) diabetes underwent blinded continuous glucose monitoring. Serial glucose measurements were divided into periods of euglycemia (70180 mg/dl), hyperglycemia (>180 mg/dl), and hypoglycemia (<70 mg/dl). The proportions of time patients were hypoglycemic, euglycemic, and hyperglycemic and the total areas under the curves (AUCs) were determined.
RESULTSDuring the observation period the 101 subjects contributed an average 287 ± 132 h of continuous glucose values. Subjects remained in the euglycemic range for 63% of the total day, were hypoglycemic 8%, and were hyperglycemic 29%. Hypoglycemia was more prevalent nocturnally (11 vs. 7%) and hyperglycemia diurnally (31 vs. 25%). Compared with subjects with type 2 diabetes, type 1 diabetic subjects had more frequent hypoglycemic episodes per day (2.1 vs. 1.0; P < 0.001) that were of longer duration (1.1 vs. 0.7 h; P < 0.0001), reflecting a greater number of hours per day in the hypoglycemic range (2.3 vs. 1.0 h; P < 0.0001). The mean hypoglycemic AUC values were >150% higher for type 1 compared with type 2 diabetic subjects (41 vs. 16, respectively; P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONSThese normative data will assist in study and sample size planning for future investigations of continuous glucose monitoring and allow for qualitative comparisons with trials of therapeutic interventions aimed at reducing the occurrence of glycemic excursions.
Abbreviations: ADA, American Diabetes Association AUC, area under the curve

CiteULike Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. R. Burge, S. Mitchell, A. Sawyer, and D. S. Schade
Continuous Glucose Monitoring: The Future of Diabetes Management
Diabetes Spectr,
April 1, 2008;
21(2):
112 - 119.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. R. Murphy, G. Rayman, K. Duffield, K. S. Lewis, S. Kelly, B. Johal, D. Fowler, and R. C. Temple
Changes in the Glycemic Profiles of Women With Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes During Pregnancy
Diabetes Care,
November 1, 2007;
30(11):
2785 - 2791.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. A. Friedman and A. L. Friedman
Is there really good news about pandemic diabetic nephropathy?
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant.,
March 1, 2007;
22(3):
681 - 683.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. E. Gerich
Clinicians can help their patients control postprandial hyperglycemia as a means of reducing cardiovascular risk.
The Diabetes Educator,
July 1, 2006;
32(4):
513 - 522.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. P. Chase
Nocturnal Hypoglycemia-- An Unrelenting Problem
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.,
June 1, 2006;
91(6):
2038 - 2039.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2005 by the American Diabetes Association.
|
|
| |
|