HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Leibson, C. L. Articles by Palumbo, P. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Leibson, C. L. Articles by Palumbo, P. J. Social Bookmarking                What's this?

Relative Risk of Mortality Associated With Diabetes as a Function of Birth Weight

¹ Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
² Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Cynthia Leibson, PhD, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN 55905. E-mail: leibson{at}mayo.edu

OBJECTIVE—Birth weight is a risk factor for both diabetes and mortality. Diabetes is a risk factor for mortality. Whether the excess mortality observed for diabetes varies with birth weight is unclear.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—Among all 2,508 Rochester, Minnesota, residents who first met research criteria for adult-onset diabetes in 1960–1995, 171 were born locally in-hospital after 1922 (i.e., birth weights available) as singleton, term infants. Each case subject and two age- and sex-matched nondiabetic control subjects (born locally, residing locally when the case subject met the criteria for diabetes) were followed through 31 December 2000 for vital status.

RESULTS—Of the diabetic case subjects, 16% (27 of 171) died vs. 7% (25 of 342) of control subjects (P = 0.004). The difference was less for normal-birth-weight (NBW) (2,948–<3,856 g) individuals (12% [12 of 102] vs. 8% [20 of 246], P = 0.31) than for abnormal-birth-weight individuals (low birth weight [LBW] 20% [8 of 39] vs. 2% [1 of 46], P = 0.01; high birth weight [HBW] 23% [7 of 30] vs. 8% [4 of 50], P = 0.16), as confirmed with age- and sex-adjusted Cox proportional hazards (diabetes-associated hazard ratio 1.4 [95% CI 0.69–2.90] for NBW vs. 4.8 [1.7–13.3] for abnormal birth weight, test for interaction P = 0.056). The observed diabetes deaths were greater than expected, based on mortality for the general population (27 vs. 13.3, P < 0.001), with 70% of excess deaths occurring among LBW (8 vs. 2.2, P < 0.001) and HBW (7 vs. 3.1, P = 0.03) individuals.

CONCLUSIONS—The excess mortality observed for diabetes appears disproportionately concentrated among abnormal-birth-weight individuals, thus identifying a subset of at-risk diabetic individuals and reinforcing the importance of NBW deliveries.

Abbreviations: HBW, high birth weight • LBW, low birth weight • NBW, normal birth weight • NDDG, National Diabetes Data Group • REP, Rochester Epidemiology Project

CiteULike    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. S Kahn, M. Graff, A. D Stein, and L H Lumey A fingerprint marker from early gestation associated with diabetes in middle age: The Dutch Hunger Winter Families Study Int. J. Epidemiol., August 6, 2008; (2008) dyn158v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]