HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Johnson, J. A. Articles by Majumdar, S. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Johnson, J. A. Articles by Majumdar, S. R. Social Bookmarking                What's this?

Generalizability and Persistence of a Multifaceted Intervention for Improving Quality of Care for Rural Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

¹ Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
² Institute of Health Economics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
³ Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
⁴ Grey Nuns Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Jeffrey A. Johnson, PhD, Institute of Health Economics, #1200-10405 Jasper Ave., Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T5J 3N4. E-mail: jeff.johnson{at}ualberta.ca

OBJECTIVE—Most quality improvement efforts for type 2 diabetes have neglected cardiovascular risk factors and are limited by a lack of information about generalizability across settings or persistence of effect over time.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—We previously reported 6-month results of a controlled study of an intervention that improved cardiovascular risk factors for rural patients with type 2 diabetes. We subsequently provided the identical intervention to the control region after the main study was completed. The primary outcome was 10% improvement in systolic blood pressure, total cholesterol, or HbA_1c. We compared the previously reported 6-month effect of the original intervention with the effect of the crossed-over intervention to the former control region and remeasured outcomes in the original intervention region 12 months later.

RESULTS—Our analysis included 200 original intervention and 181 crossed-over intervention subjects. The age of the population was 62.4 ± 12.4 years (mean ± SD), and 54.3% were women. A similar proportion of patients in the crossed-over intervention group achieved improvement in the primary composite outcome compared with the original intervention group (38 vs. 44%, respectively; P = 0.29). In adjusted analyses, we observed less improvement in blood pressure (adjusted odds ratio 0.40 [95% CI 0.17–0.75]) but greater improvements in total cholesterol (1.86 [0.93–3.7]) with the crossed-over intervention compared with the original intervention. We observed sustained improvements in total cholesterol and HbA_1c levels in the original intervention group, whereas previous large gains in control of blood pressure diminished over time.

CONCLUSIONS—We found that our intervention was generalizable across settings, and its effect persisted over time. Nevertheless, without ongoing intervention or reinforcement, we noted some loss of the original benefits that had accrued. Future translational work should incorporate interventions such as ours into ongoing systems of rural care.

CiteULike    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Rucker, J. A. Johnson, T.K. Lee, D. T. Eurich, R. Z. Lewanczuk, S. H. Simpson, E. L. Toth, and S. R. Majumdar The Natural History of LDL Control in Type 2 Diabetes: A prospective study of adherence to lipid guidelines. Diabetes Care, November 1, 2006; 29(11): 2506 - 2508. [Full Text] [PDF]