HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Viswanathan, V. Articles by Ambady, R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Viswanathan, V. Articles by Ambady, R. Social Bookmarking                What's this?

Amputation Prevention Initiative in South India

Positive impact of foot care education

M.V. Hospital for Diabetes and Diabetic Research Centre, Royapuram, Chennai, India

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Vijay Viswanathan, MD, PhD, Diabetes Research Centre, WHO Collaborating Centre for Research, Education & Training in Diabetes, No. 4, Main Road, Royapuram, Madras, 600 013, India. E-mail: dr_vijay{at}vsnl.com

OBJECTIVE—To determine whether intensive treatment and education strategies for type 2 diabetic patients with high-risk diabetic foot disease helps in preventing foot amputations.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—Participants included 4,872 consecutive type 2 diabetic patients (male-to-female ratio 3,422:1,450, mean (±SD) age 60.5 ± 8.8 years, mean duration of diabetes 13.7 ± 7.6 years) with high-risk diabetic foot disease. The patients were categorized as high-risk subjects according to the International Consensus on the Diabetic Foot. The three study groups were subjects with diabetes and neuropathy (group 1; n = 2,871), diabetic neuropathy with deformity (group 2; n = 235), and diabetic neuropathy with deformity and foot ulceration or peripheral vascular disease (group 3; n = 1,766). Neuropathy was diagnosed by biothesiometry. Peripheral vascular disease was diagnosed as an ankle brachial index <0.8. All the subjects were educated regarding diabetic foot disease and its complications and prevention. They were also instructed to visit the center if any sign of new lesions appeared.

RESULTS—Among the 1,259 group 3 subjects who came for follow-up, 718 (57%) strictly followed the advice given and 541 (43%) did not. Ulcers present during the recruitment had healed in 585 (82%) subjects who followed the advice, but in only 269 (50%) subjects who did not. A significantly larger proportion of subjects who did not follow the advice developed new problems (26%) and required surgical procedures (14%) compared with those who followed the advice (5 and 3%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS—Strategies such as intensive management and foot care education are helpful in preventing newer problems and surgery in diabetic foot disease.

CiteULike    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				V. Viswanathan The Diabetic Foot: Perspectives From Chennai, South India International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds, March 1, 2007; 6(1): 34 - 36. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Bharara, J. E. Cobb, and D. J. Claremont Thermography and thermometry in the assessment of diabetic neuropathic foot: a case for furthering the role of thermal techniques. International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds, December 1, 2006; 5(4): 250 - 260. [Abstract] [PDF]

				V. Viswanathan, S. Madhavan, S. Rajasekar, S. Chamukuttan, and R. Ambady Urban-rural differences in the prevalence of foot complications in South-Indian diabetic patients. Diabetes Care, March 1, 2006; 29(3): 701 - 703. [Full Text] [PDF]