Diabetes Care 28:1077-1082, 2005
© 2005 by the American Diabetes Association, Inc.
Emerging Treatments and Technologies Original Article |
Time-Action Profile of Inhaled Insulin in Comparison With Subcutaneously Injected Insulin Lispro and Regular Human Insulin
Klaus Rave, MD1,
Susanne Bott, MD1,
Lutz Heinemann, PHD1,
Sue Sha, MD, PHD2,
Reinhard H.A. Becker, MD, PHD3,
Susan A. Willavize, PHD2 and
Tim Heise, MD1
1 Profil Institut für Stoffwechselforschung, Neuss, Germany
2 Pfizer Global Research and Development, Groton, Connecticut
3 Aventis Pharma Deutschland, Frankfurt, Germany
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Tim Heise, Profil Institut für Stoffwechselforschung GmbH, Hellersbergstr. 9, D-41460 Neuss, Germany. E-mail: tim.heise{at}profil-research.de
OBJECTIVEThis study compares the time-action profile of inhaled insulin (INH; Exubera) with that of subcutaneously injected insulin lispro (ILP) or regular human insulin (RHI) in healthy volunteers.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODSIn this open-label, randomized, three-way, crossover study, 17 healthy male volunteers were given each of the following treatments in random order: INH (6 mg), ILP (18 units), or RHI (18 units). Glucose infusion rates and serum insulin concentrations were monitored over 10 h.
RESULTSINH had a faster onset of action than both RHI and ILP, as indicated by shorter time to early half-maximal effect (32 vs. 48 and 41 min, respectively; P < 0.001 for IHN vs. RHI and P < 0.05 for IHN vs. ILP). Time to maximal effect was comparable between INH and ILP (143 vs. 137 min; NS) but was shorter for INH than RHI (193 min; P < 0.01). The maximal metabolic effect of INH was comparable with RHI but lower than ILP (8.7 vs. 9.8 vs. 11.2 mg · kg1 · min1, respectively; P < 0.01 for INH vs. ILP). The duration of action of INH, indicated by time to late half-maximal effect (387 min), was longer than ILP (313 min; P < 0.01) and comparable to RHI (415 min; NS). Total glucodynamic effect after inhalation of INH was comparable to both ILP and RHI (NS). Relative bioefficacy of INH was 10% versus RHI and 11% versus ILP. No drug-related adverse events were observed.
CONCLUSIONSINH had a faster onset of action than RHI or ILP and a duration of action longer than ILP and comparable to RHI. These characteristics suggest that inhaled insulin is suitable for prandial insulin supplementation in patients with diabetes.
Abbreviations: AUC, area under the curve FEV, forced expiratory volume GIR, glucose infusion rate ILP, insulin lispro INH, inhaled insulin RHI, regular human insulin.

CiteULike Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. C. Liu, R. J. Riese, K. Van Gundy, P. Norwood, B. E. Sullivan, P. F. Schwartz, and J. G. Teeter
Effects of inhaled human insulin on airway lining fluid composition in adults with diabetes
Eur. Respir. J.,
July 1, 2008;
32(1):
180 - 188.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. J. Fowler
Diabetes Treatment, Part 3: Insulin and Incretins
Clin. Diabetes,
January 1, 2008;
26(1):
35 - 39.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. E. Fineberg, T. T. Kawabata, D. Finco-Kent, R. J. Fountaine, G. L. Finch, and A. S. Krasner
Immunological Responses to Exogenous Insulin
Endocr. Rev.,
October 1, 2007;
28(6):
625 - 652.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Q. Pham, H. Cohen, and V. Chu
Inhaled Human [rDNA Origin] Insulin, a Novel Formulation for Diabetes Mellitus
J. Clin. Pharmacol.,
July 1, 2007;
47(7):
890 - 903.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. L. Iltz, P. S. Odegard, S. M. Setter, and R. K. Campbell
Update in the Pharmacologic Treatment of Diabetes: Focus on Insulin Detemir, Insulin Glulisine, and Inhaled Dry Powdered Insulin
The Diabetes Educator,
March 1, 2007;
33(2):
215 - 253.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. S. Skyler, L. Jovanovic, S. Klioze, J. Reis, W. Duggan, and for the Inhaled Human Insulin Type 1 Diabetes Stud
Two-Year Safety and Efficacy of Inhaled Human Insulin (Exubera) in Adult Patients With Type 1 Diabetes
Diabetes Care,
March 1, 2007;
30(3):
579 - 585.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. T. McMahon and R. A. Arky
Inhaled Insulin for Diabetes Mellitus
N. Engl. J. Med.,
February 1, 2007;
356(5):
497 - 502.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Ceglia, J. Lau, and A. G. Pittas
Meta-analysis: efficacy and safety of inhaled insulin therapy in adults with diabetes mellitus.
Ann Intern Med,
November 7, 2006;
145(9):
665 - 675.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Bellary and A. H Barnett
Review: Inhaled insulin: overcoming barriers to insulin therapy?
The British Journal of Diabetes & Vascular Disease,
May 1, 2006;
6(3):
103 - 108.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. H.A. Becker, S. Sha, A. D. Frick, and R. J. Fountaine
The Effect of Smoking Cessation and Subsequent Resumption on Absorption of Inhaled Insulin
Diabetes Care,
February 1, 2006;
29(2):
277 - 282.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Rosenstock, B. Zinman, L. J. Murphy, S. C. Clement, P. Moore, C. K. Bowering, R. Hendler, S.-P. Lan, and W. T. Cefalu
Inhaled Insulin Improves Glycemic Control When Substituted for or Added to Oral Combination Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
Ann Intern Med,
October 18, 2005;
143(8):
549 - 558.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. M. Rave, L. Nosek, A. de la Pena, M. Seger, C. S. Ernest II, L. Heinemann, R. P. Batycky, and D. B. Muchmore
Dose Response of Inhaled Dry-Powder Insulin and Dose Equivalence to Subcutaneous Insulin Lispro
Diabetes Care,
October 1, 2005;
28(10):
2400 - 2405.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2005 by the American Diabetes Association.
|
|
| |
|