Diabetes Care
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Plank, J.
Right arrow Articles by Pieber, T. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Plank, J.
Right arrow Articles by Pieber, T. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Diabetes Care 28:1107-1112, 2005
© 2005 by the American Diabetes Association, Inc.


Emerging Treatments and Technologies
Original Article

A Double-Blind, Randomized, Dose-Response Study Investigating the Pharmacodynamic and Pharmacokinetic Properties of the Long-Acting Insulin Analog Detemir

Johannes Plank, MD1, Manfred Bodenlenz, PHD1,2, Frank Sinner, PHD2, Christoph Magnes, PHD2, Evelyn Görzer, MD1, Werner Regittnig, PHD1, Lars A. Endahl, MSC3, Eberhard Draeger, MD3, Milan Zdravkovic, MD3 and Thomas R. Pieber, MD1,2

1 Department of Internal Medicine, Diabetes and Metabolism, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria
2 Institute of Medical Technologies and Health Management, Joanneum Research, Graz, Austria
3 Novo Nordisk, Bagsvaerd, Denmark

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Thomas R. Pieber, MD, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 15, A-8036 Graz, Austria. E-mail: thomas.pieber{at}meduni-graz.at

OBJECTIVE—To investigate the pharmacodynamic profile and duration of action for five subcutaneous doses of insulin detemir (0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 0.8, and 1.6 units/kg; 1 unit = 24 nmol) and one subcutaneous dose of NPH insulin (0.3 IU/kg; 1 IU = 6 nmol).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—This single-center, randomized, double-blind, six-period, crossover study was carried out as a 24-h isoglycemic clamp (7.2 mmol/l) in 12 type 1 diabetic patients.

RESULTS—Duration of action for insulin detemir was dose dependent and varied from 5.7, to 12.1, to 19.9, to 22.7, to 23.2 h for 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 0.8, and 1.6 units/kg, respectively. Interpolation of the dose-response relationships for AUCGIR (area under the glucose infusion rate curve) revealed that a detemir dose of 0.29 units/kg would provide the same effect as 0.3 IU/kg NPH but has a longer duration of action (16.9 vs. 12.7 h, respectively). Lower between-subject variability was observed for insulin detemir on duration of action (0.4 units/kg insulin detemir vs. 0.3 IU/kg NPH, P < 0.05) and GIRmax (maximal glucose infusion rate) (0.2 and 0.4 units/kg insulin detemir vs. 0.3 IU/kg NPH, both P < 0.05). Assessment of endogenous glucose production (EGP) and peripheral glucose uptake (PGU) resulted in an AOCEGP (area over the EGP curve) of 636 mg/kg (95% CI 279–879) vs. 584 (323–846) and an AUCPGU (area under the PGU curve) of 173 (47–316) vs. 328 (39–617) for 0.29 units/kg detemir vs. 0.3 IU/kg NPH, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS—This study shows that insulin detemir provides a flat and protracted pharmacodynamic profile.

Abbreviations: AOC, area over the curve • AUC, area under the curve • EGP, endogenous glucose production • GIR, glucose infusion rate • NEFA, nonesterified fatty acid • PGU, peripheral glucose uptake


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. DiabetesHome page
M. J. Fowler
Diabetes Treatment, Part 3: Insulin and Incretins
Clin. Diabetes, January 1, 2008; 26(1): 35 - 39.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
F. Porcellati, P. Rossetti, N. R. Busciantella, S. Marzotti, P. Lucidi, S. Luzio, D. R. Owens, G. B. Bolli, and C. G. Fanelli
Comparison of Pharmacokinetics and Dynamics of the Long-Acting Insulin Analogs Glargine and Detemir at Steady State in Type 1 Diabetes: A double-blind, randomized, crossover study
Diabetes Care, October 1, 2007; 30(10): 2447 - 2452.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Health Syst PharmHome page
E. Hassan
Hyperglycemia management in the hospital setting
Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., May 15, 2007; 64(10_Supplement_6): S9 - S14.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes Spectr.Home page
A. L. Trujillo
Insulin Analogs and Pregnancy
Diabetes Spectr, April 1, 2007; 20(2): 94 - 101.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EDUCATION AND PRACTICEHome page
F. M Regan and D. B Dunger
Use of new insulins in children
Arch. Dis. Child. Ed. Pract., August 1, 2006; 91(2): ep47 - ep53.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
A. D. Mooradian, M. Bernbaum, and S. G. Albert
Narrative Review: A Rational Approach to Starting Insulin Therapy
Ann Intern Med, July 18, 2006; 145(2): 125 - 134.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Diabetes Diabetes Care Clinical Diabetes Diabetes Spectrum
Copyright © 2005 by the American Diabetes Association.