Diabetes Care 28:1568-1573, 2005
© 2005 by the American Diabetes Association, Inc.
Clinical Care/Education/Nutrition Original Article |
A Clinical Trial of Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion Versus Multiple Daily Injections in Older Adults With Type 2 Diabetes
William H. Herman, MD, MPH1,
Liza L. Ilag, MD, MS2,
Susan L. Johnson, MD2,
Catherine L. Martin, MS2,
Joyce Sinding, MS3,
Abdulaziz Al Harthi, MD2,
Cynthia D. Plunkett, RNC2,
Frankie B. LaPorte, MS4,
Ray Burke, MA2,
Morton B. Brown, PHD4,
Jeffery B. Halter, MD2 and
Philip Raskin, MD3
1 Department of Internal Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan
2 Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan
3 Department of Biomedical Research, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, Texas
4 Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan
Address correspondence and reprint requests to William H. Herman, MD, MPH, University of Michigan Health System, 1500 East Medical Center Dr., 3920 Taubman Center, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0354. E-mail: wherman{at}umich.edu
OBJECTIVETo compare the efficacy and safety of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) and multiple daily injection (MDI) in older adults with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes and to assess treatment satisfaction and quality of life.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODSAdults (n = 107) 60 years of age (mean age 66 years) with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes (mean duration 16 years, BMI 32 kg/m2, and HbA1C [A1C] 8.2%) were randomized to CSII (using insulin lispro) or MDI (using insulin lispro and insulin glargine) in a two-center, 12-month, prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Efficacy was assessed with A1C, safety by frequency of hypoglycemia, and treatment satisfaction and quality of life with the Diabetes Quality of Life Clinical Trial Questionnaire and the 36-item short-form health survey, version 2.
RESULTSForty-eight CSII subjects (91%) and 50 MDI subjects (93%) completed the study. Mean A1C fell by 1.7 ± 1.0% in the CSII group to 6.6% and by 1.6 ± 1.2% in the MDI group to 6.4%. The difference in A1C between treatment groups was not statistically significant (P = 0.20). Eighty-one percent of CSII subjects and 90% of MDI subjects experienced at least one episode of minor (self-treated) hypoglycemia (P = 0.17), and three CSII and six MDI subjects experienced severe hypoglycemia (P = 0.49). Rates of severe hypoglycemia were similarly low in the two groups (CSII 0.08 and MDI 0.23 events per person-year, P = 0.61). Weight gain did not differ between groups (P = 0.70). Treatment satisfaction improved significantly with both CSII and MDI (P < 0.0001), and the difference between groups was not statistically significant (P = 0.58).
CONCLUSIONSIn older subjects with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes, both CSII and MDI achieved excellent glycemic control with good safety and patient satisfaction.
Abbreviations: CSII, continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion DQOLCTQ, Diabetes Quality of Life Clinical Trial Questionnaire MDI, multiple daily injection SF-36 v2, 36-item short-form health survey, version 2

CiteULike Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
Find additional patient-related information at:
-
Which Is Better for Older Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: Insulin Pump Therapy or Insulin Injection Therapy?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. W. Ponder, J. S. Skyler, D. F. Kruger, D. Matheson, and B. W. Brown
Unexplained Hyperglycemia in Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion: Evaluation and Treatment
The Diabetes Educator,
March 1, 2008;
34(2):
327 - 333.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Rossetti, F. Porcellati, G. B. Bolli, and C. G. Fanelli
Prevention of Hypoglycemia While Achieving Good Glycemic Control in Type 1 Diabetes: The role of insulin analogs
Diabetes Care,
February 1, 2008;
31(Supplement_2):
S113 - S120.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. C. Pickup and E. Renard
Long-Acting Insulin Analogs Versus Insulin Pump Therapy for the Treatment of Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes
Diabetes Care,
February 1, 2008;
31(Supplement_2):
S140 - S145.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Rosenstock, A. J. Ahmann, G. Colon, J. Scism-Bacon, H. Jiang, and S. Martin
Advancing Insulin Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes Previously Treated With Glargine Plus Oral Agents: Prandial premixed (insulin lispro protamine suspension/lispro) versus basal/bolus (glargine/lispro) therapy
Diabetes Care,
January 1, 2008;
31(1):
20 - 25.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. A. Testa and D. C. Simonson
Satisfaction and Quality of Life With Premeal Inhaled Versus Injected Insulin in Adolescents and Adults With Type 1 Diabetes
Diabetes Care,
June 1, 2007;
30(6):
1399 - 1405.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. D. Wittlin
Treating the Spectrum of Type 2 Diabetes: Emphasis on Insulin Pump Therapy
The Diabetes Educator,
January 1, 2006;
32(1):
39S - 46S.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. N. Zammitt and B. M. Frier
Hypoglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes: Pathophysiology, frequency, and effects of different treatment modalities
Diabetes Care,
December 1, 2005;
28(12):
2948 - 2961.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Malone
Medications Associated with Weight Gain
Ann. Pharmacother.,
December 1, 2005;
39(12):
2046 - 2054.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Endocrinology & Metabolism News, August 2005
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.,
August 1, 2005;
90(8):
17a - 17a.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2005 by the American Diabetes Association.
|
|
| |
|