Diabetes Care
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Diabetes Care 29:1-8, 2006
DOI: 10.2337/diacare.29.01.06.dc05-1058
© 2006 by the American Diabetes Association
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kennedy, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kennedy, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Clinical Care/Education/Nutrition
Original Article

Impact of Active Versus Usual Algorithmic Titration of Basal Insulin and Point-of-Care Versus Laboratory Measurement of HbA1c on Glycemic Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

The Glycemic Optimization with Algorithms and Labs at Point of Care (GOAL A1C) trial

Laurence Kennedy, MD, FRCP1, William H. Herman, MD, MPH2, Poul Strange, MD, PHD3, Anthony Harris, PHD3 for the GOAL A1C Team

1 Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
2 Department of Internal Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan
3 sanofi-aventis, Bridgewater, New Jersey

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Laurence Kennedy, MD, Professor and Chief, Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Shands Hospital at the University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610. E-mail: kenneal{at}medicine.ufl.edu

OBJECTIVE—The objective of this study was to assess the impact of active versus usual monitoring of algorithmic insulin titration and point-of-care (POC) versus laboratory HbA1c (A1C) measurement on glycemic control in primary care.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—The Glycemic Optimization with Algorithms and Labs at Point of Care (GOAL A1C) study was a 24-week, randomized, parallel-group, four-arm, open-label study of 7,893 adults with type 2 diabetes uncontrolled by oral antidiabetic agents and requiring insulin. Patients were randomly assigned by investigators from 2,164 sites in the U.S. to insulin glargine with either 1) usual (no unsolicited contact between visits) insulin titration using a simple algorithm with laboratory A1C testing, 2) usual titration with POC A1C testing, 3) active (weekly monitored) titration with laboratory A1C testing, or 4) active titration with POC A1C testing. Outcome measures included a change in A1C and fasting self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) levels, percentage of patients achieving A1C <7.0%, and hypoglycemia frequency.

RESULTS—Significant A1C and SMBG reductions were observed in all arms (P < 0.0001). Compared with usual insulin titration, active titration achieved greater A1C reduction (1.5 vs. 1.3%; P < 0.0001), SMBG reduction (88 vs. 79 mg/dl; P < 0.0001), and proportion of patients achieving A1C <7.0% (38 vs. 30%; P < 0.0001). Among patients receiving active titration, POC A1C testing was associated with an increase in the proportion achieving an A1C <7.0% (41% for POC vs. 36% for laboratory; P < 0.0001). Hypoglycemia rates were low (usual vs. active groups: 3.7 vs. 6.0 all confirmed episodes/patient-year [P < 0.001]; 0.09 vs. 0.14 severe episodes/patient-year [NS]).

CONCLUSIONS—In a predominantly primary care setting, addition of insulin glargine using a simple algorithm achieved significant improvements in glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes in all four study arms. Active titration resulted in significant incremental improvements in glycemic control, and, among patients receiving active titration, POC A1C testing resulted in a greater portion achieving A1C <7.0%.

Abbreviations: GOAL A1C, Glycemic Optimization with Algorithms and Labs at Point of Care • ITT, intent to treat • LOCF, last observation carried forward • POC, point of care • SMBG, self-monitoring of blood glucose • TEAE, treatment-emergent adverse event • TZD, thiazolidinedione


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The Diabetes EducatorHome page
T. O'Brien and S. A. Denham
Diabetes Care and Education in Rural Regions
The Diabetes Educator, March 1, 2008; 34(2): 334 - 347.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
J. R. Petersen, J. B. Finley, A. O. Okorodudu, A. A. Mohammad, J. J. Grady, and M. Bajaj
Effect of Point-of-Care on Maintenance of Glycemic Control as Measured by A1C
Diabetes Care, March 1, 2007; 30(3): 713 - 715.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal Watch CardiologyHome page
Adding Insulin Glargine in Type 2 Diabetes
Journal Watch Cardiology, February 9, 2006; 2006(209): 8 - 8.
[Full Text]


Home page
JWatch GeneralHome page
Adding Insulin Glargine in Type 2 Diabetes
Journal Watch (General), January 20, 2006; 2006(120): 1 - 1.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Diabetes Diabetes Care Clinical Diabetes Diabetes Spectrum
Copyright © 2006 by the American Diabetes Association.