Diabetes Care
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Diabetes Care 29:2644-2649, 2006
DOI: 10.2337/dc06-1361
© 2006 by the American Diabetes Association
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Garg, S.
Right arrow Articles by Jovanovic, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Garg, S.
Right arrow Articles by Jovanovic, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Emerging Treatments and Technologies
Original Article

Relationship of Fasting and Hourly Blood Glucose Levels to HbA1c Values

Safety, accuracy, and improvements in glucose profiles obtained using a 7-day continuous glucose sensor

Satish Garg, MD1 and Lois Jovanovic, MD2

1 Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes, University of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences Center, Aurora, Colorado
2 Sansum Diabetes Research Institute, Santa Barbara, California

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Satish Garg, MD, Professor of Medicine and Pediatrics, Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes, University of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences Center, 1775 N. Ursula St. A140, Aurora, CO 80010. E-mail: satish.garg{at}uchsc.edu

OBJECTIVE—In this study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of 7-day transcutaneous, real-time, continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in subjects with insulin-requiring diabetes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—Eighty-six subjects were enrolled at five U.S. centers. Subjects wore a sensor inserted under the skin of the abdomen for 7 days during each of three consecutive periods. Data were blinded during period 1 and unblinded during periods 2 and 3.

RESULTS—Of the 6,811 matched self-monitoring of blood glucose to sensor values prospectively analyzed, 97.2% fell in the Clarke error grid zones A and B, and median absolute relative difference was 11.4%. After unblinding, subjects reduced time spent at <55 mg/dl by 0.3 h/day, reduced time spent at >240 mg/dl by 1.5 h/day, and increased time in the target zone (81–140 mg/dl) by 1.4 h/day (P < 0.05 for all three comparisons). Improvements were seen in both types 1 and 2 diabetes and with use of both multiple daily injections and continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion. Modal day graphs were generated in six groups of subjects based on HbA1c (A1C) (≤6, 6–7, 7–8, 8–9, 9–10, and >10%). Mean glucose levels from midnight to 7:00 A.M. (fasting and dawn phenomenon periods) were only normal for subjects with A1C ≤6%. All other groups were hyperglycemic during this and all periods. Reductions in overall mean glucose were achieved for the four highest A1C groupings with unblinded device use.

CONCLUSIONS—This is the first report of a real-time, transcutaneous glucose sensor that functioned for 7 days. The use of CGM in the unblinded phase resulted in improvements in target-range glycemia across all A1C values.

Abbreviations: ARD, absolute relative difference • CGM, continuous glucose monitoring • CSII, continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion • MDI, multiple daily injections • SMBG, self-monitoring of blood glucose


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Diabetes Spectr.Home page
L. C. Deeb
Diabetes Technology During the Past 30 Years: A Lot of Changes and Mostly for the Better
Diabetes Spectr, April 1, 2008; 21(2): 78 - 83.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes Spectr.Home page
M. R. Burge, S. Mitchell, A. Sawyer, and D. S. Schade
Continuous Glucose Monitoring: The Future of Diabetes Management
Diabetes Spectr, April 1, 2008; 21(2): 112 - 119.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
S. K. Garg, W. C. Kelly, M. K. Voelmle, P. J. Ritchie, P. A. Gottlieb, K. K. McFann, and S. L. Ellis
Continuous Home Monitoring of Glucose: Improved glycemic control with real-life use of continuous glucose sensors in adult subjects with type 1 diabetes
Diabetes Care, December 1, 2007; 30(12): 3023 - 3025.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
Z. T. Bloomgarden
Type 1 Diabetes and Glucose Monitoring
Diabetes Care, November 1, 2007; 30(11): 2965 - 2971.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
G. S. Eisenbarth
Update in Type 1 Diabetes
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2007; 92(7): 2403 - 2407.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
S. K. Garg
On Real-Time Estimates of Blood Glucose Levels: Response to Trevino
Diabetes Care, May 1, 2007; 30(5): e35 - e36.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Diabetes Diabetes Care Clinical Diabetes Diabetes Spectrum
Copyright © 2006 by the American Diabetes Association.