|
 |
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
DOI: 10.2337/diacare.29.04.06.dc05-1785
© 2006 by the American Diabetes Association
Epidemiology/Health Services/Psychosocial Research |
Translating the Chronic Care Model Into the Community
Results from a randomized controlled trial of a multifaceted diabetes care intervention
1 Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
2 University of Pittsburgh Diabetes Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
3 Waikato Clinical School, University of Auckland, Hamilton, New Zealand
4 Department of Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, McKeesport, Pennsylvania
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Gretchen Piatt, MPH, CHES, Kaufmann Building, Suite 601, 3471 Fifth Ave., Pittsburgh, PA 15213. E-mail: piattg{at}upmc.edu
OBJECTIVE—To determine whether using the chronic care model (CCM) in an underserved community leads to improved clinical and behavioral outcomes for people with diabetes.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—This multilevel, cluster-design, randomized controlled trial examined the effectiveness of a CCM-based intervention in an underserved urban community. Eleven primary care practices, along with their patients, were randomized to three groups: CCM intervention (n = 30 patients), provider education only (PROV group) (n = 38), and usual care (UC group) (n = 51).
RESULTS—A marked decline in HbA1c was observed in the CCM group (–0.6%, P = 0.008) but not in the other groups. The magnitude of the association remained strong after adjustment for clustering (P = 0.01). The same pattern was observed for a decline in non-HDL cholesterol and for the proportion of participants who self-monitor blood glucose in the CCM group (non-HDL cholesterol: –10.4 mg/dl, P = 0.24; self-monitor blood glucose: +22.2%, P < 0.0001), with statistically significant between-group differences in improvement (non-HDL cholesterol: P = 0.05; self-monitor blood glucose: P = 0.03) after adjustment. The CCM group also showed improvement in HDL cholesterol (+5.5 mg/dl, P = 0.0004), diabetes knowledge test scores (+6.7%, P = 0.07), and empowerment scores (+2, P = 0.02).
CONCLUSIONS—These results suggest that implementing the CCM in the community is effective in improving clinical and behavioral outcomes in patients with diabetes.
Abbreviations: ADA, American Diabetes Association • CCM, chronic care model • CDE, certified diabetes educator • DSMT, diabetes self-management training • WHO-QWB10, World Health Organization (Ten) Quality of Well-Being • RCT, randomized controlled trial
CiteULike 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  A. Cherrington, G. X. Ayala, H. Amick, J. Allison, G. Corbie-Smith, and I. Scarinci Implementing the Community Health Worker Model Within Diabetes Management: Challenges and Lessons Learned From Programs Across the United States The Diabetes Educator, September 1, 2008; 34(5): 824 - 833. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Szecsenyi, T. Rosemann, S. Joos, F. Peters-Klimm, and A. Miksch German Diabetes Disease Management Programs Are Appropriate for Restructuring Care According to the Chronic Care Model: An evaluation with the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care instrument Diabetes Care, June 1, 2008; 31(6): 1150 - 1154. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C.F. Corbett Commentary by Corbett West J Nurs Res, April 1, 2008; 30(3): 342 - 344. [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. M. Funnell, T. L. Brown, B. P. Childs, L. B. Haas, G. M. Hosey, B. Jensen, M. Maryniuk, M. Peyrot, J. D. Piette, D. Reader, et al. National Standards for Diabetes Self-Management Education Diabetes Care, January 1, 2008; 31(Supplement_1): S97 - S104. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Peeples, D. Tomky, K. Mulcahy, M. Peyrot, L. Siminerio, and on behalf of AADE Outcomes Project and AADE/UMPC D Evolution of the American Association of Diabetes Educators' Diabetes Education Outcomes Project The Diabetes Educator, September 1, 2007; 33(5): 794 - 817. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. M. Funnell, T. L. Brown, B. P. Childs, L. B. Haas, G. M. Hosey, B. Jensen, M. Maryniuk, M. Peyrot, J. D. Piette, D. Reader, et al. National Standards for Diabetes Self-Management Education The Diabetes Educator, July 1, 2007; 33(4): 599 - 614. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. M. Funnell, T. L. Brown, B. P. Childs, L. B. Haas, G. M. Hosey, B. Jensen, M. Maryniuk, M. Peyrot, J. D. Piette, D. Reader, et al. National Standards for Diabetes Self-Management Education Diabetes Care, June 1, 2007; 30(6): 1630 - 1637. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Simmons, S. Lillis, J. Swan, and J. Haar Discordance in Perceptions of Barriers to Diabetes Care Between Patients and Primary Care and Secondary Care Diabetes Care, March 1, 2007; 30(3): 490 - 495. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. Kulkarni Cure, Quality Care, Absolute Commitment: Together We Can Make It Happen Diabetes Spectr, January 1, 2007; 20(1): 53 - 54. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. M. Belalcazar and P. R. Swank Translating the Chronic Care Model Into the Community: Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial of a Multifaceted Diabetes Care Intervention: Response to Piatt et al. Diabetes Care, December 1, 2006; 29(12): 2761 - 2762. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. A. Piatt, J. C. Zgibor, and M. M. Brooks Translating the Chronic Care Model Into the Community: Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial of a Multifaceted Diabetes Care Intervention: Response to Belalcazar and Swank Diabetes Care, December 1, 2006; 29(12): 2762 - 2762. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Diabetes | Diabetes Care | Clinical Diabetes | Diabetes Spectrum |