Diabetes Care
29:1269-1274,
2006
DOI: 10.2337/dc05-1365
© 2006 by the American Diabetes Association
Emerging Treatments and Technologies Original Article |
A 26-Week, Randomized, Parallel, Treat-to-Target Trial Comparing Insulin Detemir With NPH Insulin as Add-On Therapy to Oral Glucose-Lowering Drugs in Insulin-Naïve People With Type 2 Diabetes
Kjeld Hermansen, MD1,
Melanie Davies, MD2,
Taudeusz Derezinski, MD3,
Gabrielle Martinez Ravn4,
Per Clauson4,
Philip Home, DM, DPHIL5 on behalf of the Levemir Treat-to-Target Study Group
1 Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Aarhus Sygehus THG, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
2 University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, U.K.
3 Out-Patient Clinic, NZOZ Eskulap, Gniewkowo, Poland
4 Out-Patient Clinic, Novo Nordisk, Bagsværd, Denmark
5 School of Medical SciencesDiabetes, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne, U.K.
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Professor Kjeld Hermansen, Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Aarhus Sygehus THG, Aarhus University Hospital, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark. E-mail: kjeld.hermansen{at}as.aaa.dk
OBJECTIVETo assess efficacy and tolerability of insulin detemir or NPH insulin added to oral therapy for type 2 diabetes in a treat-to-target titration protocol.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODSIndividuals (n = 476) with HbA1c (A1C) 7.510.0% were randomized to addition of twice-daily insulin detemir or NPH insulin in a parallel-group, multicenter trial. Over 24 weeks, insulin doses were titrated toward prebreakfast and predinner plasma glucose targets of 6.0 mmol/l ( 108 mg/dl). Outcomes assessed included A1C, percentage achieving A1C 7.0%, risk of hypoglycemia, and body weight.
RESULTSAt 24 weeks, A1C had decreased by 1.8 and 1.9% (from 8.6 to 6.8 and from 8.5 to 6.6%) for detemir and NPH, respectively (NS). In both groups, 70% of participants achieved an A1C 7.0%, but the proportion achieving this without hypoglycemia was higher with insulin detemir than with NPH insulin (26 vs. 16%, P = 0.008). Compared with NPH insulin, the risk for all hypoglycemia with insulin detemir was reduced by 47% (P < 0.001) and nocturnal hypoglycemia by 55% (P < 0.001). Mean weight gain was 1.2 kg with insulin detemir and 2.8 kg with NPH insulin (P < 0.001), and the difference in baseline-adjusted final weight was 1.58 (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONSAddition of basal insulin to oral drug therapy in people with suboptimal control of type 2 diabetes achieves guideline-recommended A1C values in most people with aggressive titration. Insulin detemir compared with NPH insulin achieves this with reduced hypoglycemia and less weight gain.
Abbreviations: FPG, fasting plasma glucose ITT, intention-to-treat OGLD, oral glucose-lowering drug

CiteULike Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. F Van Gaal, S. W Gutkin, and M. A Nauck
Exploiting the antidiabetic properties of incretins to treat type 2 diabetes mellitus: glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists or insulin for patients with inadequate glycemic control?
Eur. J. Endocrinol.,
June 1, 2008;
158(6):
773 - 784.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Dagdelen, L. L. Ilag, S. Martin, S. J. Jacober, R. R. Holman, A. J. Farmer, M. J. Davies, G. T. McMahon, and R. G. Dluhy
Addition of insulin to oral therapy in type 2 diabetes.
N. Engl. J. Med.,
March 13, 2008;
358(11):
1197 - 1198.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. C. Riddle
Combined Therapy With Insulin Plus Oral Agents: Is There Any Advantage?: An argument in favor
Diabetes Care,
February 1, 2008;
31(Supplement_2):
S125 - S130.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. J. Fowler
Diabetes Treatment, Part 3: Insulin and Incretins
Clin. Diabetes,
January 1, 2008;
26(1):
35 - 39.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Rosenstock, A. J. Ahmann, G. Colon, J. Scism-Bacon, H. Jiang, and S. Martin
Advancing Insulin Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes Previously Treated With Glargine Plus Oral Agents: Prandial premixed (insulin lispro protamine suspension/lispro) versus basal/bolus (glargine/lispro) therapy
Diabetes Care,
January 1, 2008;
31(1):
20 - 25.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Z. T. Bloomgarden
Diabetes and Obesity: Part 1
Diabetes Care,
December 1, 2007;
30(12):
3145 - 3151.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Riddle, J. Frias, B. Zhang, H. Maier, C. Brown, K. Lutz, and O. Kolterman
Pramlintide Improved Glycemic Control and Reduced Weight in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Using Basal Insulin
Diabetes Care,
November 1, 2007;
30(11):
2794 - 2799.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. T. McMahon and R. G. Dluhy
Intention to Treat -- Initiating Insulin and the 4-T Study
N. Engl. J. Med.,
October 25, 2007;
357(17):
1759 - 1761.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. R. Holman, K. I. Thorne, A. J. Farmer, M. J. Davies, J. F. Keenan, S. Paul, J. C. Levy, and the 4-T Study Group
Addition of Biphasic, Prandial, or Basal Insulin to Oral Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes
N. Engl. J. Med.,
October 25, 2007;
357(17):
1716 - 1730.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. J. Abrahamson
Intensive Glucose Control in Elderly Adults--Reply
JAMA,
May 23, 2007;
297(20):
2196 - 2196.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. R. Gavin III
Practical Approaches to Insulin Therapy
The Diabetes Educator,
March 1, 2007;
33(Supplement_3):
66S - 73S.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Z. T. Bloomgarden
Achieving Glycemic Goals in Type 2 Diabetes
Diabetes Care,
January 1, 2007;
30(1):
174 - 180.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. B. Leichter
Evaluating The Therapeutic Package for Diabetic Patients: The Whole Exceeds the Sum of Its Parts
Clin. Diabetes,
July 1, 2006;
24(3):
102 - 104.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2006 by the American Diabetes Association.
|
|
| |
|