HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: dc07-0870v1 30/10/2608    most recent Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Mehra, S. Articles by Malik, R. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Mehra, S. Articles by Malik, R. A. Social Bookmarking                What's this?

Corneal Confocal Microscopy Detects Early Nerve Regeneration After Pancreas Transplantation in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes

¹ Transplant Unit, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, U.K
² Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Manchester and Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, U.K
³ Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. R.A. Malik, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9NT, U.K. E-mail: rayaz.a.malik{at}man.ac.uk

OBJECTIVE—Corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) is a rapid, noninvasive, clinical examination technique that quantifies small nerve fiber pathology. We have used it to assess the neurological benefits of pancreas transplantation in type 1 diabetic patients.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—In 20 patients with type 1 diabetes undergoing simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation (SPK) and 15 control subjects, corneal sensitivity was evaluated using noncontact corneal esthesiometry, and small nerve fiber morphology was assessed using CCM.

RESULTS—Corneal sensitivity (1.54 ± 0.28 vs. 0.77 ± 0.02, P < 0.0001), nerve fiber density (NFD) (13.8 ± 2.1 vs. 42 ± 3.2, P < 0.0001), nerve branch density (NBD) (4.04 ± 1.5 vs. 26.7 ± 2.5, P < 0.0001), and nerve fiber length (NFL) (2.23 ± 0.2 vs. 9.69 ± 0.7, P < 0.0001) were significantly reduced, and nerve fiber tortuosity (NFT) (15.7 ± 1.02 vs. 19.56 ± 1.34, P = 0.04) was increased in diabetic patients before pancreas transplantation. Six months after SPK, 15 patients underwent a second assessment and showed a significant improvement in NFD (18.04 ± 10.48 vs. 9.25 ± 1.87, P = 0.001) and NFL (3.60 ± 0.33 vs. 1.84 ± 0.33, P = 0.002) with no change in NBD (1.38 ± 0.74 vs. 1.38 ± 1.00, P = 1.0), NFT (15.58 ± 1.20 vs. 16.30 ± 1.19, P = 0.67), or corneal sensitivity (1.23 ± 0.39 vs. 1.54 ± 00.42, P = 0.59).

CONCLUSIONS—Despite marked nerve fiber damage in type 1 diabetic patients undergoing pancreas transplantation, small fiber repair can be detected within 6 months of pancreas transplantation using CCM. CCM is a novel noninvasive clinical technique to assess the benefits of therapeutic intervention in human diabetic neuropathy.

Abbreviations: CCM, corneal confocal microscopy • NBD, nerve branch density • NFD, nerve fiber density • NFL, nerve fiber length • NFT, nerve fiber tortuosity • SPK, simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation

CiteULike    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. J.M. Boulton Whither Clinical Research in Diabetic Sensorimotor Peripheral Neuropathy?: Problems of end point selection for clinical trials Diabetes Care, October 1, 2007; 30(10): 2752 - 2753. [Full Text] [PDF]