Diabetes Care
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online November 13, 2007
Diabetes Care 31:353-360, 2008
DOI: 10.2337/dc07-1452
© 2008 by the American Diabetes Association
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Online-Only Appendix
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
dc07-1452v1
31/2/353    most recent
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Black, H. R.
Right arrow Articles by Thadani, U.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Black, H. R.
Right arrow Articles by Thadani, U.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Cardiovascular and Metabolic Risk
Original Research

Metabolic and Clinical Outcomes in Nondiabetic Individuals With the Metabolic Syndrome Assigned to Chlorthalidone, Amlodipine, or Lisinopril as Initial Treatment for Hypertension

A report from the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT)

Henry R. Black, MD1, Barry Davis, MD, PHD2, Joshua Barzilay, MD3, Chuke Nwachuku, MA, MPH, DRPH4, Charles Baimbridge, MS2, Horia Marginean, MD, MS5, Jackson T. Wright, Jr., MD, PHD6, Jan Basile, MD7, Nathan D. Wong, PHD8, Paul Whelton, MD, MSC9, Richard A. Dart, MD10 and Udho Thadani, MD11

1 New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York
2 University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston School of Public Health, Houston, Texas
3 Kaiser Permanente of Georgia, Tucker, Georgia
4 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
5 Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
6 General Clinical Research Center, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, Ohio
7 VA Medical Center Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina
8 University of Southern California Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
9 Loyola University School of Medicine, Maywood, Illinois
10 Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, Wisconsin
11 University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, VA Medical Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Joshua Barzilay, MD, Kaiser Permanente of Georgia, 200 Crescent Centre Pkwy, Tucker, GA 30084. E-mail: joshua.barzilay{at}kp.org

OBJECTIVE—Optimal initial antihypertensive drug therapy in people with the metabolic syndrome is unknown.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—We conducted a subgroup analysis of the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT) to compare metabolic, cardiovascular, and renal outcomes in individuals assigned to initial hypertension treatment with a thiazide-like diuretic (chlorthalidone), a calcium channel blocker (CCB; amlodipine), or an ACE inhibitor (lisinopril) in nondiabetic individuals with or without metabolic syndrome.

RESULTS—In participants with metabolic syndrome, at 4 years of follow-up, the incidence of newly diagnosed diabetes (fasting glucose ≥126 mg/dl) was 17.1% for chlorthalidone, 16.0% for amlodipine (P = 0.49, chlorthalidone vs. amlodipine) and 12.6% for lisinopril (P < 0.05, lisinopril vs. chlorthalidone). For those without metabolic syndrome, the rate of newly diagnosed diabetes was 7.7% for chlorthalidone, 4.2% for amlodipine, and 4.7% for lisinopril (P < 0.05 for both comparisons). There were no differences in relative risks (RRs) for outcomes with amlodipine compared with chlorthalidone in those with metabolic syndrome; in those without metabolic syndrome, there was a higher risk for heart failure (RR 1.55 [95% CI 1.25–1.35]). In comparison with lisinopril, chlorthalidone was superior in those with metabolic syndrome with respect to heart failure (1.31 [1.04–1.64]) and combined cardiovascular disease (CVD) (1.19 [1.07–1.32]). No significant treatment group–metabolic syndrome interaction was noted.

CONCLUSIONS—Despite a less favorable metabolic profile, thiazide-like diuretic initial therapy for hypertension offers similar, and in some instances possibly superior, CVD outcomes in older hypertensive adults with metabolic syndrome, as compared with treatment with CCBs and ACE inhibitors.

Abbreviations: ALLHAT, Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial • ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker • CCB, calcium channel blocker • CHD, coronary heart disease • CVD, cardiovascular disease • DBP, diastolic blood pressure • GFR, glomerular filtration rate • MI, myocardial infarction • SBP, systolic blood pressure


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JWatch GeneralHome page
Choice of Antihypertensive Agents for Patients with Metabolic Syndrome: ALLHAT Results
Journal Watch (General), March 11, 2008; 2008(311): 2 - 2.
[Full Text]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
J. T. Wright Jr, S. Harris-Haywood, S. Pressel, J. Barzilay, C. Baimbridge, C. J. Bareis, J. N. Basile, H. R. Black, R. Dart, A. K. Gupta, et al.
Clinical Outcomes by Race in Hypertensive Patients With and Without the Metabolic Syndrome: Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT)
Arch Intern Med, January 28, 2008; 168(2): 207 - 217.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Diabetes Diabetes Care Clinical Diabetes Diabetes Spectrum
Copyright © 2008 by the American Diabetes Association.