Diabetes Care 31:1455-1460, 2008 DOI: 10.2337/dc07-2308 © 2008 by the American Diabetes Association
Rosiglitazone and Risk of CancerA meta-analysis of randomized clinical trialsFrom the Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Section of Geriatric Cardiology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy Corresponding author: Edoardo Mannucci, edoardo.mannucci{at}unifi.it ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE—Despite experimental data suggesting a protective effect of peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor- RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—Randomized clinical trials of rosiglitazone with duration of >24 weeks were retrieved through Medline and from the GlaxoSmithKline Web site, which reports main results of all trials sponsored by GlaxoSmithKline; incident malignancies were retrieved from the summary of serious adverse events. Proportions of outcome measures across treatment groups were compared by odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CI. Considering differences in the duration of follow-up among treatment arms in some of the trials, we also calculated the incidence of cancer in rosiglitazone and control groups. RESULTS—Eighty trials, enrolling 16,332 and 12,522 patients in the rosiglitazone and comparator groups, respectively, were retrieved. Rosiglitazone was not associated with a significant modification of the risk of cancer (OR 0.91 [95% CI 0.71–1.16], P = 0.44). The incidence of malignancies was significantly lower in rosiglitazone-treated patients than in control groups (0.23 [0.19–0.26] vs. 0.44 [0.34–0.58] cases/100 patient-years; P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS—The use of rosiglitazone appears to be safe in terms of incidence of cancer, whereas its possible protective effect needs to be further investigated.
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||