Diabetes Care
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Diabetes Care Publish Ahead of Print published online ahead of print January 11, 2008
DOI: 10.2337/dc07-0873

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
dc07-0873v1
31/4/735    most recent
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wolzt, M.
Right arrow Articles by Muchmore, D. B.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wolzt, M.
Right arrow Articles by Muchmore, D. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Original Research

AIR® Inhaled Insulin versus Subcutaneous Insulin: Pharmacokinetics, Glucodynamics, and Pulmonary Function in Asthma

Michael Wolzt, MD1, Amparo de la Peña, PhD2, Pierre-Yves Berclaz, MD2, Fabián S. Tibaldi, PhD2, Jeffrey R. Gates, DHSc2 and Douglas B. Muchmore, MD2

1Clinical Pharmacology, Vienna, Austria
2Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN

michael.wolzt{at}meduniwien.ac.at

ABSTRACT

Objective: This study evaluated pharmacokinetic and glucodynamic responses to AIR® inhaled insulin relative to subcutaneous insulin lispro, safety, pulmonary function, and effects of salbutamol co-administration.

Research Design And Methods: Healthy, mild asthmatic, and moderate asthmatic subjects (n=13/group; age 19–58 years; nonsmoking; nondiabetic) completed this phase I, open-label, randomized, crossover euglycemic clamp study. Subjects received 12U-equivalent AIR Insulin, or 12U subcutaneous insulin lispro, or salbutamol+AIR Insulin (moderate asthma group only) prior to clamp.

Results: AIR Insulin exposure was reduced 34% and 41% (both P<0.01) in asthmatic subjects (AUC0-t', 24.0 and 21.1 nmol·min/L in mild and moderate subjects, respectively), relative to healthy subjects (35.2 nmol·min/L). Glucodynamic effects were similar in healthy and mild asthmatic subjects (Gtot 38.7 and 23.4 g respectively, P=0.16), and reduced in moderate asthmatic subjects (Gtot 10.7 g). Salbutamol pretreatment (moderate asthmatic subjects) improved bioavailability. AIR insulin had no discernable effect on pulmonary function. AIR Insulin adverse events (cough, headache, and dizziness) were mild-to-moderate in intensity and have been previously reported or are typical of studies involving glucose clamp procedures.

Conclusions: This study suggests that pulmonary disease severity and asthma treatment status influence the metabolic effect of AIR Insulin in individuals with asthma, but do not affect AIR Insulin pulmonary safety or tolerability. In view of the potential interactions between diabetes treatment and pulmonary status it is prudent to await the results of ongoing clinical trials in diabetic patients with comorbid lung disease before considering the use of inhaled insulin in such patients.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Diabetes Diabetes Care Clinical Diabetes Diabetes Spectrum
Copyright © 2008 by the American Diabetes Association.