Diabetes Care 28:S72-S79, 2005
© 2005 by the American Diabetes Association, Inc.
STANDARDS AND REVIEW CRITERIA ORIGINAL ARTICLE |
National Standards for Diabetes Self-Management Education
Carolé Mensing, RN, MA, CDE, (Task Force Chair),
Jackie Boucher, MS, RD, LD, CDE,
Marjorie Cypress, MS, C-ANP, CDE,
Katie Weinger, EDD, RN,
Kathryn Mulcahy, MSN, RN, CDE,
Patricia Barta, RN, MPH, CDE,
Gwen Hosey, MS, ARNP, CDE,
Wendy Kopher, RN, C, CDE, HTP,
Andrea Lasichak, MS, RD, CDE,
Betty Lamb, RN, MSN,
Mavourneen Mangan, RN, MS, ANP, C, CDE,
Jan Norman, RD, CDE,
Jon Tanja, BS, MS, RPH,
Linda Yauk, MS, RD, LD, CDE,
Kimberlydawn Wisdom, MD, MS and
Cynthia Adams, PHD
| The first 300 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
 |
PROBLEM STATEMENT
|
|---|
Diabetes Self-Management Education (DSME) is the cornerstone of care for all individuals with diabetes who want to achieve successful health-related outcomes. The National Standards for DSME are designed to define quality diabetes self-management education that can be implemented in diverse settings and will facilitate improvement in health care outcomes. The dynamic health care process obligates the diabetes community to periodically review and revise these standards to reflect advances in scientific knowledge and health care.
Therefore, the Task Force to review the National Standards for DSME was convened to review the current standards for their appropriateness, relevancy, and scientific basis, and to be sure they are specific and achievable in multiple settings.
 |
PROCEDURE FOR REVISION OF THE NATIONAL STANDARDS FOR DIABETES SELF-MANAGEMENT EDUCATION PROGRAMS
|
|---|
The Task Force to Review and Revise the National Standards for Diabetes Self-Management Education Programs decided to do the following:
- Critically review the current standards and prepare an evidence-based review of the literature.
- Revise the National Standards for Diabetes Self-Management Education Programs as appropriate.
Establishing procedure
The Task Force began this task by outlining a process to be used for accomplishing its charge:
- Examine the adequacy of representation on the Task Force itself to ensure fair, relevant, and impartial revisions of the National Standards (the sponsoring organization for this revision of the National Standards is the American Diabetes Association).
- Perform an initial review of the current standards to identify areas that need to be addressed.
- Collect input from individuals and organizations who utilize the current standards.
- Set a timeline for accomplishing the charge.
- Critically review each standard and perform a review of the literature for each.
- Review new trends in diabetes education and care.
- Review the National Standards to ensure quality and consistency with the current American Diabetes Association Standards of Medical Care.
- Obtain critiques from secondary sources interested or involved in diabetes care.
- Perform a final review of the revised . . . [Full Text of this Article]
 |
REPRESENTATION ON THE TASK FORCE
|
|---|
Organizations, federal agencies, and federally funded programs Disciplines
 |
PROCESS
|
|---|
 |
STANDARDS
|
|---|
Structure Standard 1. Standard 2. Standard 3. Standard 4. Standard 5. Standard 6. Standard 7. Process Standard 8. Standard 9. Outcomes Standard 10. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR OVERSIGHT AND FUTURE REVIEWS DEFINITION OF TERMS best practice clients community continuous quality improvement (CQI) criteria diabetes self-management education (DSME) educational intervention evaluation evidence-based expert opinion health professional instructional staff medical nutrition therapy multidisciplinary paraprofessional participant services stakeholder standard target population(s)

CiteULike Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Wysocki, R. Iannotti, J. Weissberg-Benchell, L. Laffel, K. Hood, B. Anderson, R. Chen, and for the Family Management of Childhood Diabetes St
Diabetes Problem Solving by Youths with Type 1 Diabetes and their Caregivers: Measurement, Validation, and Longitudinal Associations with Glycemic Control
J. Pediatr. Psychol.,
March 17, 2008;
(2008)
jsn024v1.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. S. Magwood, J. Zapka, and C. Jenkins
A Review of Systematic Reviews Evaluating Diabetes Interventions: Focus on Quality of Life and Disparities
The Diabetes Educator,
March 1, 2008;
34(2):
242 - 265.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Hill-Briggs, H.-C. Yeh, T. L. Gary, M. Batts-Turner, T. D'Zurilla, and F. L. Brancati
Diabetes Problem-Solving Scale Development in an Adult, African American Sample
The Diabetes Educator,
March 1, 2007;
33(2):
291 - 299.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. K. Butcher, J. Gilman, J. F. Meszaros, D. Bjorsness, M. Madison, J. M. McDowall, C. S. Oser, E. A. Johnson, T. S. Harwell, S. D. Helgerson, et al.
Improving Access to Quality Diabetes Education in a Rural State: The Montana Quality Diabetes Education Initiative
The Diabetes Educator,
November 1, 2006;
32(6):
963 - 967.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Emerson
Implementing Diabetes Self-Management Education in Primary Care
Diabetes Spectr,
April 1, 2006;
19(2):
79 - 83.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. J. Tibbetts
Diabetes Self-Management Education: A Saga of Angels and Demons
Diabetes Spectr,
January 1, 2006;
19(1):
54 - 57.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
The Scope of Practice, Standards of Practice, and Standards of Professional Performance for Diabetes Educators
The Diabetes Educator,
July 1, 2005;
31(4):
487 - 512.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. L. Edwards
Managing Diabetes in Correctional Facilities
Diabetes Spectr,
July 1, 2005;
18(3):
146 - 151.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. A. Mullooly and K. L. Kemmis
Diabetes Educators and the Exercise Prescription
Diabetes Spectr,
April 1, 2005;
18(2):
108 - 113.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2005 by the American Diabetes Association.
|
|
|