Diabetes Care
30:2399-2400,
2007
DOI: 10.2337/dc07-9925
© 2007 by the American Diabetes Association
Reviews/Commentaries/ADA Statements Consensus Statement |
Consensus Statement on the Worldwide Standardization of the Hemoglobin A1C MeasurementThe American Diabetes Association, European Association for the Study of Diabetes, International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, and the International Diabetes Federation
Consensus Committee*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Richard Kahn, PhD, American Diabetes Association, 1701 N. Beauregard St., Alexandria, VA 22311. E-mail: rkahn@diabetes.org
Abbreviations: ADAG, A1C-derived average glucose IFCC, International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine NGSP, National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program
| The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below. |
 |
INTRODUCTION
|
|---|
The hemoglobin A1C (A1C) assay has become the gold-standard measurement of chronic glycemia for over two decades. Anchored in the knowledge that elevated A1C values increase the likelihood of the microvascular complications of diabetes (and perhaps macrovascular complications as well), clinicians have used A1C test results to guide treatment decisions, and the assay has become the cornerstone for the assessment of diabetes care.
The clinical world has assumed that the A1C assay reflects average glycemia over the preceding few months. However, the data supporting that premise are not exceptionally robust (1–5); glucose concentrations were not measured frequently enough to compute a true "average." To gain a better understanding of the relationship between A1C and average blood glucose, an international study has been initiated to document this relationship, using frequent capillary measurements and continuous glucose monitoring. The results of this study will be known around September 2007. Although some clinicians are already providing patients with their "average blood glucose," by simply converting the current A1C test results (6) to a term more relevant to the values obtained from . . . [Full Text of this Article]
 |
What are the implications of the above activities?
|
|---|
 |
APPENDIX
|
|---|
Consensus Committee

CiteULike Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Iqbal, C. Morgan, H. Maksoud, and I. Idris
Improving patients' knowledge on the relationship between HbA1c and mean plasma glucose improves glycaemic control among persons with poorly controlled diabetes
Ann Clin Biochem,
September 1, 2008;
45(5):
504 - 507.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A H Berg and D B Sacks
Haemoglobin A1c analysis in the management of patients with diabetes: from chaos to harmony
J. Clin. Pathol.,
September 1, 2008;
61(9):
983 - 987.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. M. Nathan, J. Kuenen, R. Borg, H. Zheng, D. Schoenfeld, R. J. Heine, and for the A1c-Derived Average Glucose (ADAG) Study G
Translating the A1C Assay Into Estimated Average Glucose Values
Diabetes Care,
August 1, 2008;
31(8):
1473 - 1478.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Kahn and V. Fonseca
Translating the A1C Assay
Diabetes Care,
August 1, 2008;
31(8):
1704 - 1707.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Geistanger, S. Arends, C. Berding, T. Hoshino, J.-O. Jeppsson, R. Little, C. Siebelder, C. Weykamp, and on behalf of the IFCC Working Group on Standardiza
Statistical Methods for Monitoring the Relationship between the IFCC Reference Measurement Procedure for Hemoglobin A1c and the Designated Comparison Methods in the United States, Japan, and Sweden
Clin. Chem.,
August 1, 2008;
54(8):
1379 - 1385.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. R Macdonald, A. M Hanson, M. R Holland, and B. M Singh
Clinical impact of variability in HbA1c as assessed by simultaneously measuring fructosamine and use of error grid analysis
Ann Clin Biochem,
July 1, 2008;
45(4):
421 - 425.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. D. Saudek, W. H. Herman, D. B. Sacks, R. M. Bergenstal, D. Edelman, and M. B. Davidson
A New Look at Screening and Diagnosing Diabetes Mellitus
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.,
July 1, 2008;
93(7):
2447 - 2453.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Diabetes Research in Children Network (DirecNet) S
Relationship of A1C to Glucose Concentrations in Children With Type 1 Diabetes: Assessments by high-frequency glucose determinations by sensors
Diabetes Care,
March 1, 2008;
31(3):
381 - 385.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Weykamp, W G. John, A. Mosca, T. Hoshino, R. Little, J.-O. Jeppsson, I. Goodall, K. Miedema, G. Myers, H. Reinauer, et al.
The IFCC Reference Measurement System for HbA1c: A 6-Year Progress Report
Clin. Chem.,
February 1, 2008;
54(2):
240 - 248.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Trevino
Consensus Statement on the Worldwide Standardization of the Hemoglobin A1C Measurement: the American Diabetes Association, European Association for the Study of Diabetes, International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, and the International Diabetes Federation: Response to the Consensus Committee
Diabetes Care,
December 1, 2007;
30(12):
e141 - e141.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Goldfarb
Groups Move to Standardize A1C Internationally
DOC News,
November 1, 2007;
4(11):
7 - 7.
[Full Text]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2007 by the American Diabetes Association.
|
|
|