DOI: 10.2337/dc07-1165 © 2007 by the American Diabetes Association
Clinical Depression Versus Distress Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: Not Just a Question of SemanticsResponse to Hermanns et al.
1 Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California Address correspondence to Lawrence Fisher, PhD, Box 0900, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143. E-mail: fisherl@fcm.ucsf.edu
Given the findings of our recently published report (1) and their earlier study (2), Hermanns et al. (3) suggest that because screening for multiple conditions is not always feasible, it may make sense to use diabetes distress measures to assess both depression and diabetes-specific distress. Both studies concluded that measures of diabetes distress captured both the negative affect associated with depression and the negative affect associated with diabetes-related distress. Hermanns et al. support their view by presenting cogent arguments that are based on the sensitivity of distress measures in capturing both kinds of negative affect. We used the Center for Epidemiology Depression Scale (CESD) (4) to assess depressive affect and the Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS) (5) to measure diabetes distress. We also used a structured interview, the Composite International Diagnostic
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||