© 2001 by the American Diabetes Association, Inc.
Orthostatic Hypertension in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes
1 Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, National Fukuoka Higashi Hospital, Koga, Fukuoka
OBJECTIVEThe prevalence and clinical importance of orthostatic hypertension (OHT) in diabetic patients has not been elucidated, in contrast to orthostatic hypotension, which is occasionally found in diabetic patients with autonomic neuropathy.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODSThe prevalence and severity of orthostatic hypertension was investigated in 277 Japanese male patients with type 2 diabetes, including 90 hypertensive patients and 128 nondiabetic age-matched male subjects. Patients treated with antihypertensive drugs were excluded from the study. OHT was defined as an increase in diastolic blood pressure (DBP) from <90 to RESULTSThe prevalence of OHT in normotensive and hypertensive diabetic patients was significantly higher than in control subjects (12.8 vs. 1.8%, P < 0.01, for normotensive patients; 12.6 vs. 11.1%, not significant, for hypertensive patients). Orthostasis induced a mean increase of 6.8 ± 11.4 mmHg in SBP and 9.1 ± 5.2 mmHg in DBP in diabetic patients with OHT compared with those without OHT (-1.0 ± 9.0 and 3.8 ± 6.6 mmHg, respectively). Vibration sensation in the lower limb was reduced in diabetic patients with OHT, but the percent coefficient of variation of RR interval, cardio-to-thoracic ratio on chest X-ray, and serum triglyceride levels were higher in these patients compared with normotensive diabetic patients without OHT. CONCLUSIONSOrthostatic hypertension is a novel complication in normotensive diabetic patients and may associate with early stage neuropathy and development of sustained hypertension.
Abbreviations: CTR, cardio-to-thoracic ratio CVRR, coefficient of variation of RR interval DBP, diastolic blood pressure ECG, electrocardiogram IMT, intima media thickness JNC IV, fourth Joint National Committee on the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Pressure OHT, orthostatic hypertension QTc, corrected QT interval SBP, systolic blood pressure
Orthostatic hypertension (OHT) is a cause of labile hypertension and is occasionally found in patients with mild or borderline hypertension. The clinical importance of OHT has not been reported in patients with diabetes, in contrast to orthostatic hypotension, which is a well-known ominous complication caused by autonomic denervation in patients with long-term poor control of blood glucose levels. Orthostasis causes gravitational shift in circulating blood from the intrathoracic space to lower extremities and reduces venous return to the heart. Thus, a fall in stroke volume reduces the pulse pressure, whereas the mean blood pressure is usually maintained by autonomic regulation (1). On the other hand, diabetic patients show occasional disturbance of parasympathetic autonomic regulation preceding overt autonomic neuropathy. Thus, a relative enhancement of sympathetic tone may elicit a hypersensitive response to the orthostasis-induced elevation of blood pressure. Thus, OHT may develop into sustained hypertension and result in the development of vascular complications. In the present study, we examined the prevalence and background clinical profile of OHT in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes.
We studied 405 Japanese male subjects, including 277 patients with type 2 diabetes who were consecutively recruited from workers who visited the clinic of a public transportation company to undergo an annual health check for type 2 diabetes. Patients taking antihypertensive drugs were excluded from the study. The diagnosis of type 2 diabetes was based on World Health Organization criteria (2). Subjects were treated with or without oral hypoglycemic drugs. We also recruited a group of 128 age-matched nondiabetic normotensive men who were free of chronic renal failure, central nervous system disease, and malignancies.
Blood pressure was measured on the right arm in sitting, supine, and then standing position. Supine blood pressure was measured 35 min after lying on the bed, and then remeasured 1 min after standing. Blood pressure was measured twice in each position, and the average value was used for analysis. Hypertension was defined as sitting SBP Venous blood samples were taken in the morning after an overnight fast. The samples were analyzed for blood glucose, HbA1c, total and HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, and creatinine. HbA1c levels were measured by high performance liquid chromatography (normal, 4.05.7%). An electrocardiogram (ECG) was recorded for 200 beats in the supine position. The QT interval was corrected by heart rate (QTc). SV1 + RV5 (summated amplitude of R wave at the precordial lead V5 and S wave at the lead V1) was determined as a voltage parameter, and the coefficient of variation of RR interval (CVRR) was computed (4). Vibration sense was measured with a C64 tuning fork on bilateral toes, and the mean of perceptible time was used.
Statistical analysis
Prevalence of OHT Of the 277 diabetic patients, 90 (32.4%) were hypertensive (Table 1). The prevalence of OHT in normotensive and hypertensive diabetic patients was equally high compared with hypertensive nondiabetic subjects (12.8 and 12.2 vs. 10%, respectively), although the prevalence in normotensive nondiabetic subjects was significantly lower (1.8%). Thus, the prevalence of OHT was significantly higher in normotensive diabetic patients compared with normotensive nondiabetic subjects (P = 0.001). When sitting blood pressure was classified based on JNC IV criteria (3), no differences were present in the prevalence of OHT between diabetic and nondiabetic subjects with high normal blood pressure and hypertension (Fig. 1). On the other hand, among normotensive subjects, 9 (13.6%) of 66 diabetic subjects developed OHT in contrast to no OHT in nondiabetic subjects (P < 0.05). Orthostatic hypotension was found in diabetic and nondiabetic subjects independent of hypertension, and it was excluded from further analysis (Table 1).
Orthostatic changes in blood pressure In diabetic patients with OHT, orthostasis induced a mean increase of 6.8 ± 11.4 and 9.1 ± 5.2 mmHg in SBP and DBP, respectively. In contrast, SBP in hypertensive diabetic patients showed a significant decrease by -2.1 ± 8.2 mmHg, whereas SBP on standing did not change significantly in normotensive nondiabetic subjects and diabetic patients (Fig. 2). DBP in normotensive nondiabetic subjects and normotensive and hypertensive diabetic patients without OHT increased significantly after standing from supine position (2.9 ± 7.3, 3.6 ± 6.2, and 4.2 ± 7.2 mmHg, respectively).
Differences in clinical profile There were no differences in age, treatment, duration of diabetes, alcohol intake, smoking habit, BMI, pulse rate, proteinuria, fasting blood glucose, HbA1c, total cholesterol, or HDL cholesterol among diabetic patients with OHT, normotensive diabetic subjects without OHT, and hypertensive diabetic subjects without OHT (Table 2). In diabetic patients with OHT, the percentage of patients who had family members with hypertension was lower than in hypertensive diabetic patients without OHT and higher than that seen in normotensive diabetic patients without OHT, although there was no statistical significance. Serum triglyceride levels and cardio-to-thoracic ratios (CTRs) on the chest X-rays in diabetic patients with OHT and in those with hypertension were significantly higher than in normotensive diabetic patients without OHT. The vibration sense in diabetic patients with OHT was decreased compared with normotensive and hypertensive patients without OHT. There was no difference in Achilles tendon reflex between diabetic patients with OHT and those without OHT. The intima media thickness (IMT) and prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy and ischemic heart disease on ECG in hypertensive diabetic patients were higher than in normotensive diabetic subjects without OHT. There was no statistical difference in IMT and ECG abnormalities between diabetic patients with OHT and normotensive diabetic patients without OHT. The percent CVRR was significantly higher in diabetic patients with OHT compared with normotensive patients without OHT.
The major finding of the present study was the high prevalence of OHT in diabetic patients (fivefold) compared with in nondiabetic subjects. In particular, the prevalence of OHT in normotensive diabetic patients was higher than in normotensive nondiabetic subjects. The prevalence of OHT in normotensive nondiabetic subjects was as low as 2% and was similar to the previously reported rate of 4.2% among 2,000 aviators (1).
Kario et al. (5) reported that among 110 asymptomatic elderly hypertensive patients without treatment, 7.2% had OHT, defined as a rise in SBP Only a few studies have investigated the pathogenesis of OHT (6,7,8). The likely mechanisms of OHT include 1) excessive venous pooling, with an initial drop in cardiac output followed by overcompensation with an excessive release of catecholamines (6); 2) nephroptosis, with orthostatic activation of the renin-angiotensin system (7); and 3) vascular adrenergic hypersensitivity (8). None of the diabetic patients with OHT had microhematuria suggestive of nephroptosis. These patients had a reduced mean time of vibration perception compared with those without OHT, suggesting the presence of neuropathy. On the other hand, CVRR remained higher in diabetic patients with OHT than in those without OHT. Because CVRR is known to decrease in parallel with parasympathetic autonomic nerve dysfunction, which proceeds to sympathetic nerve dysfunction in diabetic patients (3,9,10), the rather high CVRR suggests the preserved parasympathetic nervous system activity and may reflect the hypersensitivity of cardiopulmonary baroreflex. The patients with OHT also showed high levels of serum triglycerides that were similar to those in hypertensive patients without OHT. Hypertriglyceridemia is a hallmark of the insulin resistance syndrome (11), which is associated with overstimulation of sympathetic nervous system activity (12). In this regard, treatment of autonomic neuropathy in diabetic patients with tolrestat, an aldose reductase inhibitor, is reported to reduce orthostatic elevation of blood pressure (13). Therefore, the hypersensitivity of the cardiopulmonary baroreflex and sympathetic nervous system may contribute to the pathogenesis of OHT in the diabetic state. The high prevalence of OHT supports the importance of high normal blood pressure as a risk for coronary heart disease in diabetic patients, as is stated in JNC IV (3). Payen et al. (14) reported that an orthostatic increase in blood pressure might be a determining factor for development of sustained hypertension. Although the prognosis of OHT is not well defined, the increased mean CTR in patients with OHT to a level similar to that in hypertensive patients implies that OHT may accelerate vascular injury. In conclusion, our results indicate that OHT is a novel complication in normotensive diabetic patients with early stage neuropathy, and they suggest that OHT may associate with the development of hypertension and vascular complications.
The authors thank Junko Ishimatsu for her excellent secretarial work.
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Mototaka Yoshinari, MD, Department of Internal Medicine, National Fukuoka-Higashi Hospital, Tidori 1-1-1, Koga, Fukuoka, 811-3195, Japan. E-mail: yosinari{at}intmed2.med.kyushu-u.ac.jp. Received for publication 15 February 2001 and accepted in revised form 3 July 2001. A table elsewhere in this issue shows conventional and Système International (SI) units and conversion factors for many substances.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||