© 2001 by the American Diabetes Association, Inc.
Plasma Levels of Tumor Necrosis Factor-
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(TNF-
), IGF-I, growth hormone (GH), and
angiotensin II in individuals with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT).
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Because glucose toxicity per se
leads to insulin resistance, the determination of the primary metabolic
alterations leading to insulin resistance is best accomplished in individuals
who are at an increased risk to develop type 2 diabetes. Therefore, 48
subjects with IGT and insulin resistance (IR), characterized by
hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamps, were compared with 52 healthy
insulin-sensitive (IS) control subjects with respect to the relationship
between the plasma levels of TNF-
, IGF-I, GH, angiotensin II, FFA,
leptin, and insulin resistance.
RESULTS Between the IR and the IS groups, there were no
significant differences in the plasma concentrations of TNF-
, GH,
angiotensin II, IGF-I, and leptin. However, plasma FFA levels were
significantly elevated in the IR group compared with the IS group after
matching for BMI.
CONCLUSIONS The plasma concentrations of FFA, but not
TNF-
, IGF-I, GH, and angiotensin II, are elevated in patients at an
early stage of insulin resistance, suggesting that FFAs, but not the other
modulators of the IRS system, may be a primary metabolic abnormality leading
to insulin resistance.
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(TNF-
), GH, angiotensin II, and IGF-I interact with
these receptors and, therefore, could potentially inhibit or at least modulate
the insulin-signaling pathway
(4). Liu et al.
(5) showed that TNF-
inhibits insulin signaling in human adipocytes in vitro. Moreover, the
administration of TNF-
leads to insulin resistance
(6). Angiotensin II stimulates
tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS-1 and IRS-2, which leads to a binding of the
IRSs to phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K). Folli et al.
(7) showed that the PI3K
activity is inhibited by angiotensin II in a dose-dependent manner, suggesting
that angiotensin II negatively modulates insulin signaling. Angiotensin II
could therefore contribute to insulin resistance in individuals with increased
activity of the renin-angiotensin system
(7). Although IGF-I is
considered to be the mediator of the growth-promoting effects of GH, the
metabolic effects of these two hormones are different. Euglycemic clamp
studies show that insulin sensitivity improves in patients with acromegaly
after transsphenoidal adenomectomy
(8), and in transgenic rabbits,
overexpression of GH led to symptoms of insulin resistance
(9). GH treatment in
GH-deficient humans induces insulin resistance, whereas IGF-I administration
to these subjects improves insulin sensitivity
(10). Both GH and IGF-I engage
the IRS system and could thereby affect the insulin-signaling pathway. Free fatty acid (FFAs) and leptin are other mediators linked to insulin resistance that have unknown interactions with the insulin-signaling cascade. Elevation in FFA levels produces peripheral insulin resistance in a concentration-dependent manner in healthy nonpregnant (11,12), pregnant (13), and diabetic subjects (14); likewise, overnight lowering of elevated FFAs with acipimox improves insulin resistance in obese diabetic and nondiabetic subjects (15). Prolonged elevation of FFAs induces a ß-cell defect similar to that found in type 2 diabetes (16). Moreover, in Zucker diabetic fatty (ZDF) rats, FFAs have been shown to induce apoptosis of ß-cells via de novo ceramide formation and increased nitric oxide production (17). High serum leptin levels are associated with the insulin-resistant (IR) phenotype in offspring of patients with type 2 diabetes (18,19). However, the underlying mechanisms for the elevated leptin levels in IR subjects remain to be determined.
A number of studies have investigated the defects in glucose metabolism in
healthy first-degree offspring of patients with type 2 diabetes
(20,21).
By means of a euglycemic clamp and an intravenous glucose tolerance test with
respect to the early alterations in glucose metabolism, Weyer et al.
(22,23)
characterized Pima Indians with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) or impaired
fasting glucose with a high risk to develop diabetes. However, in these
studies, alterations in plasma levels of TNF-
, GH, angiotensin II,
IGF-I, FFA, and leptin have not been investigated.
In summary, TNF-
, GH, angiotensin II, IGF-I, FFA, and leptin can
induce insulin resistance. There is no study investigating these parameters in
relation to insulin resistance determined by the euglycemic clamp in
prediabetic IR individuals. Because hyperglycemia per se can induce insulin
resistance, only subjects with normal fasting blood glucose levels were chosen
for the study. Our aims were to investigate whether there are differences in
the plasma concentration of these parameters between a well-characterized
pheno-type with severe insulin resistance and a group of healthy
insulin-sensitive (IS) control subjects without a family history of type 2
diabetes and to determine if any of these parameters could serve as a marker
for the severity of insulin resistance.
| RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In addition to these criteria, the IR group (48 subjects with IGT and insulin resistance) was defined as follows:
The IR group was recruited from 214 subjects who were screened by OGTTs for early diagnosis of diabetes. The IS group consisted of 52 healthy IS control subjects who fulfilled the following inclusion criteria:
To correct for the influence of the body weight and body fat mass on FFA and leptin levels, BMI matched subgroups from the IR (n = 12, 6 males and 6 females) and the IS (n = 10, 5 males and 5 females) group were compared.
The study was approved by the ethics committee of the University of Leipzig. All subjects gave written informed consent before participating in the study.
OGTT
The OGTT was performed according to the criteria of the American Diabetes
Association (24). The patients
documented a high-carbohydrate diet 3 days before the OGTT. The OGTT was taken
after an overnight fast with 75 g standardized glucose solution (Glucodex
Solution 75 g; Merieux, Montreal, Canada). Venous blood samples were taken at
0, 60, 90, and 120 min for measurements of plasma glucose, insulin, and
C-peptide.
Hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic glucose clamp
Insulin sensitivity was determined with the hyperinsulinemic-euglcyemic
clamp method (25). Subjects
with a whole-body glucose uptake <40 µmol · kg-1
· min-1 were defined as insulin resistant, and probands with
a whole-body glucose uptake >50 µmol · kg-1 ·
min-1 were defined as insulin sensitive according to previously
described criteria (20). After
an overnight fast and supine resting for 30 min, intravenous catheters were
inserted into antecubital veins in both arms. One was used for the infusion of
insulin and glucose; the other was used for the frequent sampling. After a
priming dose of 1.2 nmol/m2 insulin, the infusion with insulin
(Actrapid 100 U/ml; Novo Nordisk, Bagsvaerd, Denmark) was started with a
constant infusion rate of 0.28 nmol · m-2 body surface
· min-1 and continued for 120 min. After 3 min, the variable
20% glucose infusion rate was added. The glucose infusion rate was adjusted
during the clamp to maintain the blood glucose at 5.0 mmol/l. Bedside blood
glucose measurements were performed every 5 min using the glucose
dehydrogenase technique with Hemocue B (Hemocue, Angelholm, Sweden).
Additional blood samples were taken after 60 min and during the steady state
for the determination of glucose, insulin, C-peptide, angiotensin II,
TNF-
, FFA, GH, IGF-I, IGF binding protein 3 (IGFBP-3), and leptin.
Assays and calculations
BMI was calculated as weight (kilograms) divided by height (meters)
squared. Waist and hip circumferences were measured. Blood samples were taken
after an overnight fast and after 30 min in the supine position to determine
serum lipids, angiotensin II, TNF-
, FFA, GH, IGF-I, IGFBP-3, leptin,
and standard laboratory parameters. Because GH and IGF-I secretion is highly
variable, at least three measurements at different time points were performed.
Plasma glucose was measured by the glucose oxidase method (ESAT 6660-2;
Prüfgerätewerk
Medingen, Dresden, Germany). Plasma insulin was determined in a two-site
chemiluminescent enzyme immunometric assay for the Immulite automated analyzer
(Diagnostic Products, Los Angeles, CA). Plasma C-peptide was determined in a
solid-phase chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay using the Immulite automated
analyzer. For the quantification of serum FFAs, an in vitro enzymatic
colorimetric method was used (NEFA C, ACS-ACOD method; Wako, Neuss, Germany).
Leptin was determined by a competitive in-house RIA for leptin. Polyclonal
antibodies against human recombinant leptin were raised in rabbits (Peprotech,
Rocky Hill, NJ). Standards or serum specimens in duplicate were mixed with
0.05 ml 125I-labeled leptin and incubated with leptin antibody
(diluted 1:10,000) for 16-20 h at 4°C. A mixture of anti-rabbit IgG and
PEG 6000 was added for the double-antibody precipitation method. The
sensitivity of the RIA (2 SD of the 0 ng/ml level, n = 12) was 0.2
ng/ml. Interassay and intra-assay coefficients of variation were <12.5% in
the range between 1 and 8 ng/ml leptin. The recovery of dilution experiments
(undiluted until 1:20) was 88-112% for the concentration range between 4 and 6
ng/ml. Leptin levels of our in-house RIA (x) are comparable with data
of a commercially available leptin RIA (y) from Mediagnost
(Tübingen, Germany) in sera of normal-weight and
adipose subjects: y = -0.13 + 0.96x (n = 92,
r = 0.94, P < 0.0001). Because leptin levels are largely
determined by BMI, the leptin levels measured in this study were adjusted to
BMI using the SD score (SDS), as previously described
(26). In addition, BMI-matched
IR subgroups (BMI 26.2 ± 0.3 kg/m2) and IS subgroups (BMI
25.9 ± 0.2 kg/m2) were investigated.
Plasma levels of human GH were determined in a solid-phase two-site
chemiluminescent enzyme immunometric assay for use with the Immulite automated
analyzer (Diagnostic Products). Serum levels of IGF-I were measured after acid
ethanol extraction by a competitive solid-phase immunoassay according to the
method of Kratzsch et al.
(27). That assay was modified
by the use of biotin for labeling of IGF-I and streptavidineuropium (Wallac,
Turku, Finland) for the detection of labeled molecules by time-resolved
fluorescence. The sensitivity of the assay (2 SD of the 0 ng/ml level,
n = 12) was <0.9 ng/ml. Intra-assay and interassay coefficients of
variation were <10% in the range between 100 and 500 ng/ml. Serum levels of
IGFBP-3 were determined by a commercially available enzyme-linked
immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (DSL, Sinsheim, Germany). The sensitivity of that
assay was found to be <0.8 ng/ml. Intra- and interassay coefficients were
<12% in the range between 4 and 40 ng/ml. Angiotensin II plasma levels were
determined by an RIA (Nichols Institute Diagnostics, San Juan Capistrano, CA).
Plasma TNF-
concentrations were determined in triplicate using a
commercial ELISA (human TNF-
OptEIA; PharMingen, San Diego, CA). The
sensitivity of that assay is <1 pg/ml
Statistical analysis
Data are shown as mean ± SD. For the statistical analysis, plasma
concentrations in the steady state of the euglycemic clamp were used. The
calculation of insulin sensitivity in the steady state during the second hour
of the euglycemic clamp was performed as described
(25). Insulin sensitivity was
determined as the glucose infusion rate during the steady state of the clamp
divided by the steady-state insulin concentration, as previously described
(28). All calculations and
statistics were performed with SPSS for Windows (SPSS, Chicago). The
differences between the groups were tested by one-way analysis of variance. In
case the P value was <0.05, the groups were compared by the
appropriate test (Student's t test for unpaired samples or the
2 test). A P value of <0.05 was regarded as
significant. Correlations between variables were tested with Spearman's
correlation test. A correlation coefficient (r) of P <
0.05 was accepted as significant.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Plasma concentrations of TNF-
, IGF-I, GH, and angiotensin
II
There was no difference in the mean plasma TNF-
concentration
between the IS group and the IR group (Table
1). There was no relation between the TNF-
level and age,
sex, or BMI in any group. The mean plasma GH concentrations were not
significantly different between the IS and the IR groups
(Table 1). Basal IGF-I plasma
concentrations were not different between the IR and the IS groups
(Table 1). This lack of
discrepancy also applies to the concentrations of the IGFBP-3
(Table 1). There was no
correlation between the age and the sex of the participants and the GH (mean
from at least three measurements) and IGF-I levels. A correlation between the
BMI and GH or IGF-I was not found. Furthermore, no statistically significant
differences were found between the angiotensin II plasma concentrations in the
IS and the IR groups (Table 1).
There were no correlations between angiotensin II plasma concentrations and
BMI or blood pressure.
The extent of insulin resistance determined by the whole-body glucose
uptake did not correlate with the plasma concentration of TNF-
,
angiotensin II, GH, or IGF-I (Table
3).
|
Leptin and FFAs
There is a strong positive relationship among the amount of adipose tissue,
sex, and leptin levels (29).
Therefore, serum leptin concentrations were adjusted for sex and BMI by
calculating the SDS (26) and
by comparing BMI-matched IR and IS subgroups. The calculated leptin SDS for
females was 0.087 ± 0.03 in the IR group and -0.071 ± 0.04 in
the IS group (NS); for males, it was 0.96 ± 0.18 in the IR group and
0.78 ± 0.08 in the IS group (NS). There were no significant differences
for the serum leptin concentrations between the BMI-matched IR and IS
subgroups (Fig. 1A).
No correlation between the leptin levels in the BMI-matched groups and the
extent of insulin resistance in the euglycemic clamp could be found
(Table 3). There was a
correlation between the fasting insulin levels and leptin levels (r =
0.81). However, a significant correlation between leptin and insulin serum
concentrations was not detectable in the BMI-matched subgroups.
|
Although the fasting FFA serum levels are in the normal range in both groups, the IR subjects had significantly (P < 0.05) higher serum concentrations of FFAs (0.59 ± 0.12 mmol/l) compared with the IS group (0.31 ± 0.08 mmol/l), independent of sex. To correct for the known association between BMI and FFA serum concentrations, BMI-matched IR and IS subgroups were compared. Independent of BMI, the IR subgroup had significantly higher FFA concentrations compared with the IS subgroup (Fig. 1B). The FFA serum concentrations correlate (r = 0.76) with the extent of insulin resistance (µmol · kg-1 · min-1), as determined by euglycemic clamps.
| CONCLUSIONS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We investigated the relationship between the potential inhibitors of IRS
signaling (TNF-
, IGF-I, GH, and angiotensin II) and insulin resistance
in individuals with IGT and severe insulin resistance at an early stage of
diabetes development.
TNF-
has been shown to induce insulin resistance in vitro
(33,34,35)
and in animal models (36). In
humans, the role of TNF-
in insulin resistance is still controversial.
In one study, the administration of TNF-
led to insulin resistance
(6), and TNF-
overexpression in adipose tissue
(37) and muscle
(38) of obese IR subjects
correlates with insulin resistance. However, Ofei et al.
(39) did not find any effect
of recombinant TNF-
-neutralizing antibody on insulin resistance in
obese subjects with type 2 diabetes. In our study, there was no correlation
between the plasma concentration of TNF-
determined by a highly
sensitive assay and the degree of insulin resistance measured as whole-body
glucose uptake during euglycemic clamp. One explanation for these results
could be that local TNF-
production in adipose tissue is not released
into the circulation and, therefore, does not alter TNF-
levels in
peripheral blood. Thus, our results do not exclude that TNF-
acts in a
paracrine or autocrine manner. The latter could in part explain the lack of
insulin resistance improvement after administration of antiTNF-
antibody (39). Moreover, an
elevation of TNF-
plasma levels could occur at a later state of
diabetes development secondary to further metabolic alterations
(40), which are not present in
our subjects.
Because angiotensin II negatively modulates insulin signaling by stimulating multiple serine phosphorylation events in the early components of the insulin signaling cascade in vitro (7), elevated angiotensin II serum concentrations are a possible cause for the coincidence of insulin resistance and hypertension. Folli et al. (7) showed that angiotensin II was able to inhibit the insulin-stimulated PI3K activity in the rat heart (mediated via the angiotensin1 receptor) by 60%, suggesting that angiotensin II can be regarded as a potential inducer of insulin resistance. In healthy individuals, angiotensin II infusion increases insulin sensitivity determined by the glucose uptake during euglycemic clamp (41,42), but not in patients with type 2 diabetes (41). The different in vivo results can partly be explained by the existence of different angiotensin receptors or a higher affinity of the IRS cascade to insulin stimulation, as compared with the angiotensin II stimulation if both agents are simultaneously acting. In our study, there was no evidence that angiotensin II either increases or decreases insulin sensitivity, because individuals with extreme insulin resistance and healthy IS subjects had no significantly different angiotensin II plasma levels, and because no correlation between the glucose uptake in the euglycemic clamp and the angiotensin II plasma concentrations was detectable (Table 3). Because no participant had hypertension from our data, we cannot exclude that, in subjects with insulin resistance and hypertension, angiotensin II could secondarily cause a deterioration of insulin resistance. Therefore, elevated angiotensin II levels do not seem to be a primary metabolic defect in insulin resistance.
Elevated growth hormone plasma concentrations are associated with insulin resistance in patients with acromegaly (30) or in GH-deficient patients treated with GH (10) or during GH therapy in children with short stature (43). Because GH phosphorylates IRS proteins (4), GH could be a potential inhibitor of the IRS-signaling cascade. In our subjects, there is no evidence that elevation in GH plasma concentrations could be a primary defect in the insulin resistance syndrome. There were no differences in the mean GH levels between the IR and the IS group. The IS group has slightly increased but not significantly higher IGF-I plasma concentrations compared with the IR group. IGF-I was shown to improve insulin sensitivity in GH-deficient individuals (10), and tissue availability of circulating IGF-I seems to be a determinant of insulin sensitivity in patients with hypertension (44). We cannot exclude a decreased peripheral IGF-I tissue availability in the IR group. However, it is unlikely that alterations of the IGF-I serum concentration are a primary metabolic defect leading to insulin resistance.
In summary, elevated plasma concentrations of potential antagonists of the
IRS cascade (TNF-
, IGF-I, GH, and angiotensin II) seem not to be the
primary metabolic alteration of the early stages of the insulin resistance
syndrome. This is also suggested by the observation that plasma levels of
these parameters do not correlate with the BMI. However, these results do not
allow concluding a cause-and-effect relationship between the assayed plasma
concentrations of the parameters and insulin resistance on the cellular level
in adipose tissue or skeletal muscle.
There were no significant differences in the leptin serum concentrations between the IR and the IS group after BMI matching (Fig. 1A) and after adjustment of the leptin concentrations for the BMI by the SDS (26). Therefore, increased serum leptin levels are unlikely to be a primary metabolic alteration in the development of type 2 diabetes. These results are in contrast to the recently reported elevation of leptin levels in offspring of patients with type 2 diabetes (18,19). A possible explanation for the different findings is that the leptin levels in our individuals were only normalized for the BMI, whereas in the other studies, leptin levels were normalized for total fat mass, intra-abdominal fat mass, and fasting plasma insulin levels.
Elevated FFA concentrations in different physiological situations (11,12,13) or in patients with type 2 diabetes (14) are associated with peripheral insulin resistance. Santomauro et al. (15) recently showed that overnight lowering of elevated FFAs with Acipimox improves insulin resistance in obese diabetic and nondiabetic subjects. Mason et al. (16) showed that prolonged elevation of plasma FFAs can desensitize the insulin secretory response to glucose in vivo, thereby inducing a ß-cell defect similar to type 2 diabetes. FFA concentrations are commonly elevated in obesity (45). Therefore, we also compared BMI-matched IR and IS subgroups. Plasma FFA concentrations in the IR group were significantly higher than those in the IS group. Moreover, the plasma FFA levels correlated with the extent of insulin resistance (Table 1). Genetic defects are the most likely causes for increased FFA levels, potentially leading to insulin resistance in the IR group.
In conclusion, the plasma concentrations of TNF-
, GH, and
angiotensin II are not elevated in patients with IGT and insulin resistance at
an early stage of diabetes development, suggesting that alterations of these
potential inhibitors of the IRS system are not the primary metabolic defects
leading to insulin resistance. There was also no correlation between IGF-I and
leptin serum concentrations and the extent of insulin resistance as measured
by the glucose disposal in the euglycemic clamp. Elevated FFA levels could be
an early metabolic defect in the insulin resistance syndrome.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank H.-U. Häring, K. Rett, and E. Maerker for support to establish the hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp technique for this study. We also thank Prof. Richter and R. Unger, Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Pathobio-chemistry, University of Leipzig, for the assistance in performing FFA assays. We would also like to thank all patients and volunteers for their participation in this study.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Abbreviations: ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; FFA, free
fatty acid; GH, growth hormone; HOMA, homeostasis model assessment; IGFBP-3,
IGF binding protein 3; IGT, impaired glucose tolerance; IR, insulin-resistant;
IRS, insulin receptor substrate; IS, insulin-sensitive; OGTT, oral glucose
tolerance test; PI3K, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase; RIA, radioimmunoassay;
SDS, SD score; TNF-
, tumor necrosis factor-
.
A table elsewhere in this issue shows conventional and Système International (SI) units and conversion factors for many substances.
Received for publication August 9, 2000. Accepted for publication November 1, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(TNF
)-induced insulin resistance: evidence for differential regulation
of insulin signalling by TNF
. Endocrinology139
: 4928-4935,1998
antibody (CDP571) on insulin
sensitivity and glycemic control in patients with NIDDM.
Diabetes 45:881
-885, 1996[Abstract]
concentrations in a native Canadian population
with high rates of type 2 diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol
Metab 84:272
-278, 1999This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Bluher, J. W. Bullen Jr., J. H. Lee, S. Kralisch, M. Fasshauer, N. Kloting, J. Niebauer, M. R. Schon, C. J. Williams, and C. S. Mantzoros Circulating Adiponectin and Expression of Adiponectin Receptors in Human Skeletal Muscle: Associations with Metabolic Parameters and Insulin Resistance and Regulation by Physical Training J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2006; 91(6): 2310 - 2316. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. Krauss Lipids and Lipoproteins in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Diabetes Care, June 1, 2004; 27(6): 1496 - 1504. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. D. Wiesner, M. Bluher, M. Windgassen, and R. Paschke Improvement of Insulin Sensitivity after Adrenalectomy in Patients with Pheochromocytoma J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 2003; 88(8): 3632 - 3636. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Krakoff, T. Funahashi, C. D.A. Stehouwer, C. G. Schalkwijk, S. Tanaka, Y. Matsuzawa, S. Kobes, P. A. Tataranni, R. L. Hanson, W. C. Knowler, et al. Inflammatory Markers, Adiponectin, and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes in the Pima Indian Diabetes Care, June 1, 2003; 26(6): 1745 - 1751. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Lee, S. D. Chernausek, A. C. S. Hokken-Koelega, and P. Czernichow International Small for Gestational Age Advisory Board Consensus Development Conference Statement: Management of Short Children Born Small for Gestational Age, April 24-October 1, 2001 Pediatrics, June 1, 2003; 111(6): 1253 - 1261. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Dzienis-Straczkowska, M. Straczkowski, M. Szelachowska, A. Stepien, I. Kowalska, and I. Kinalska Soluble Tumor Necrosis Factor-{alpha} Receptors in Young Obese Subjects With Normal and Impaired Glucose Tolerance Diabetes Care, March 1, 2003; 26(3): 875 - 880. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Straczkowski, I. Kowalska, A. Stepien, S. Dzienis-Straczkowska, M. Szelachowska, and I. Kinalska Increased Plasma-Soluble Tumor Necrosis Factor-{alpha} Receptor 2 Level in Lean Nondiabetic Offspring of Type 2 Diabetic Subjects Diabetes Care, October 1, 2002; 25(10): 1824 - 1828. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Franckhauser, S. Munoz, A. Pujol, A. Casellas, E. Riu, P. Otaegui, B. Su, and F. Bosch Increased Fatty Acid Re-esterification by PEPCK Overexpression in Adipose Tissue Leads to Obesity Without Insulin Resistance Diabetes, March 1, 2002; 51(3): 624 - 630. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Diabetes | Diabetes Care | Clinical Diabetes< |